[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33477-en":3,"doc-seo-33477-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33477,8796095461564,"Liam","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",2,"Literature","Meinongianism as a Theory of Fictional Discourse","Daniel Corsano presents a detailed account of how fictional discourse challenges traditional interpretations of quantification, especially when such discourse implies ontological commitment for statements about nonexistent objects. The paper compares strict and permissive readings of quantification, then develops Meinongianism as an alternative metaphysical and logical approach. It argues that Meinongianism resolves problems surrounding fictional entities and nonexistent objects with notable ease, while common objections are inconclusive, yet does not qualify as a complete theory of fictional discourse.","","cbCailu35Z0tX8Gf","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailu35Z0tX8Gf","pdf",144772,1,21,"English","en",105,"# The problems of fictional discourse\n## Nonexistent objects and Plato’s beard\n## Two interpretations of quantification\n## Fictional discourse and its types","[{\"question\":\"Why does fictional discourse create problems for traditional logic and metaphysics?\",\"answer\":\"Statements about fictional or nonexistent entities raise the issue of how such sentences can have meaning without requiring an existing subject or object. This tension is connected to the problem of nonexistent objects, often called “Plato’s beard.”\"},{\"question\":\"What is the difference between strict and permissive interpretations of quantification?\",\"answer\":\"Under the strict interpretation, a logical subject presupposes existence, so existence is not treated as a predicate. Under the permissive interpretation, existence functions as a predicate true only of certain objects, allowing “so-being” to be independent of “being.”\"},{\"question\":\"How does Meinongianism address fictional discourse and nonexistent objects?\",\"answer\":\"Meinongianism treats objects as collections of properties located in logical space, and links the relevant commitments primarily to the existence predicate (E!). The paper argues this framework handles issues tied to fictional discourse and nonexistent objects more effectively than competing approaches, and that major objections are inconclusive.\"}]",1782210720,32,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":27},"meinongianism-as-a-theory-of-fictional-discourse",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/meinongianism-as-a-theory-of-fictional-discourse/33477/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Why does fictional discourse create problems for traditional logic and metaphysics?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"Statements about fictional or nonexistent entities raise the issue of how such sentences can have meaning without requiring an existing subject or object. This tension is connected to the problem of nonexistent objects, often called “Plato’s beard.”","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"What is the difference between strict and permissive interpretations of quantification?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"Under the strict interpretation, a logical subject presupposes existence, so existence is not treated as a predicate. Under the permissive interpretation, existence functions as a predicate true only of certain objects, allowing “so-being” to be independent of “being.”",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"How does Meinongianism address fictional discourse and nonexistent objects?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"Meinongianism treats objects as collections of properties located in logical space, and links the relevant commitments primarily to the existence predicate (E!). The paper argues this framework handles issues tied to fictional discourse and nonexistent objects more effectively than competing approaches, and that major objections are inconclusive.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]