[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-182906-105":59,"doc-detail-182906-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","medical-education-2022-tiffin-situational-judgement-test-performance-and-subsequent-misconduct-in-medical-students","Medical Education 2022 Tiffin Situational Judgement Test Performance and Subsequent Misconduct in Medical Students","","This document, titled \"Medical Education 2022 Tiffin Situational Judgement Test Performance and Subsequent Misconduct in Medical Students,\" delves into the performance on situational judgement tests (SJTs) among medical students and its correlation with subsequent misconduct. Table 1 provides a comprehensive demographic and educational overview of the 6910 applicants included in the analytic dataset. It details the proportion of male and non-White ethnicity students, those who attended state schools, UK residents, and individuals with non-professional backgrounds. The table also outlines applicant ages at the UCAT sitting and their performance on the UCAT SJT and total cognitive scores, along with advanced qualification z-scores. The data highlights that the mean UCAT SJT z-score was 0.30 (SD 0.87), and the mean UCAT total cognitive z-score was 0.70 (SD 0.74), with minimal missing data for these metrics. Notably, a significant portion, 19.99%, had missing data for advanced qualification z-scores. The research appears to be a formal report or academic paper analyzing these factors to understand potential links between academic assessment performance and professional conduct in medical training.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/medical-education-2022-tiffin-situational-judgement-test-performance-and-subsequent-misconduct-in-medical-students/182906/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/medical-education-2022-tiffin-situational-judgement-test-performance-and-subsequent-misconduct-in-medical-students/182906.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Miles","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-04","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",17,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the main focus of the document?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The document analyzes the performance of medical students on situational judgement tests (SJTs) and its relationship with subsequent misconduct.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What demographic information is provided in Table 1?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Table 1 includes data on gender, ethnicity, type of school attended, residency, background, age at UCAT sitting, and performance on UCAT SJT and cognitive scores.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What were the mean UCAT SJT and total cognitive z-scores reported?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The mean UCAT SJT z-score was 0.30 (SD 0.87), and the mean UCAT total cognitive z-score was 0.70 (SD 0.74).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},182906,1788350396,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},13056703019404,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","| TABLE 1 Demographic and educational information for applicants included in the analytic dataset (N = 6910) |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Demographic variable | Proportion (%) | Missing (%) |\n| Male gender | 3025/6910 (43.80%) | 0/6910 (0%) |\n| 'Non-White' ethnicity | 2065/6060 (34.06%) | 850/6910 (12.29%) |\n| Attended state school | 4340/5785 (75.02%) | 1125/6910 (16.27%) |\n| UK resident | 6190/6910 (89.62%) | 0/6910 (0%) |\n| Non-professional background | 250/6910 (3.63%) | 0/6910 (0%) |\n| Age >20 at UCAT sitting | 1180/6910 (17.11%) | 0/6910 (0%) |\n| Educational variable | Standardised mean (SD) | Missing (%) |\n| UCAT SJT z-score | 0.30 (0.87) | 0/6910 (0%) |\n| UCAT total cognitive z-score | 0.70 (0.74) | 0/6910 (0%) |\n| Advanced qualification z-score (compared to applicants) | 0.05 (0.61) | 1380/6910 (19.99%) |","cbCailzrMz5Qguc0","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailzrMz5Qguc0","pdf",549181,11,"English","# Table 1 Demographic and educational information for applicants included in the analytic dataset (N = 6910)","[{\"question\":\"What is the main focus of the document?\",\"answer\":\"The document analyzes the performance of medical students on situational judgement tests (SJTs) and its relationship with subsequent misconduct.\"},{\"question\":\"What demographic information is provided in Table 1?\",\"answer\":\"Table 1 includes data on gender, ethnicity, type of school attended, residency, background, age at UCAT sitting, and performance on UCAT SJT and cognitive scores.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the mean UCAT SJT and total cognitive z-scores reported?\",\"answer\":\"The mean UCAT SJT z-score was 0.30 (SD 0.87), and the mean UCAT total cognitive z-score was 0.70 (SD 0.74).\"}]","Medical Education 2022 Tiffin Situational Judgement Test Performance and Subsequent Misconduct in Medical Students | PDF",28]