[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-148250-en":3,"doc-seo-148250-105":30,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":91},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":27,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},148250,2336475104736,"วิน","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c5e0e5b17e70?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1786591360781797222",7,"Healthcare","Medical Board of California Decision and Order - Decision Date and Clerical Correction","Decision and Order from the Medical Board of California, acting through the Department of Consumer Affairs, amended an attached Proposed Decision to correct a clerical error that did not change the factual or legal basis. The document identifies respondent details, procedural history, and hearing participation via videoconference due to COVID-19. It summarizes a misdemeanor conviction for theft substantially related to physician qualifications, sets out the factual background and probation terms, and concludes that a public reprimand is appropriate, effective after the stated order date.","BEFORE THE  \n# MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRSSTATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\nIn the Matter of the AccusationAgainst:  \nYahir A.Santiago-Lastra,M.D.  \nCase No.800-2019-061705  \nPhysician's and Surgeon'sCertificate No.A143504  \nRespondent.  \n## DECISION\n\nThe attached Proposed Decision is hereby amended,pursuant toGovernmental Code section 11517(c)(2)(C),to correct a clerical error thatdoes not affect the factual or legal basis of the Proposed Decision.TheProposed Decision is amended as follows:  \n1.Page 31,paragraph 3,line 1,the name is corrected to read“Yahir A.Santiago-Lastra”.  \nThe attached Proposed Decision is hereby adopted as the Decisionand Order of the Medical Board of California,Department of ConsumerAffairs,State of California.  \nThis Decision shall become effective at 5:00 p.m.on September 30,2021.  \nIT IS SO ORDERED August 31,2021.  \nMEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIA  \n9. m  \nBEFORE THE  \n# MEDICAL BOARD OF CALIFORNIADEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRSSTATE OF CALIFORNIA\n\nIn the Matter of the Accusation Against:  \nYAHIR A.SANTIAGO-LASTRA,M.D.,Respondent  \nPhysician's and Surgeon's Certificate No.A143504  \nCase No.800-2019-061705  \nOAH No.2020070605  \n## PROPOSED DECISION\n\nVallera J.Johnson,Administrative Law Judge,Office of Administrative Hearings(OAH),State of California,heard this matter on July 6,7,and 8,2021,viavideoconference,due to the COVID-19 Pandemic.  \nJason A.Ahn,Deputy Attorney General,represented William Prasifka,ExecutiveDirector of the Medical Board of California,Department of Consumer Affairs.  \nNicole Irmer,Attorney at Law,Law Office of Nicole Irmer,represented Yahir A.Santiago-Lastra,M.D.,who was present during the hearing.  \nTestimony and documentary evidence was received.The record was closed,andthe matter was submitted for decision on July 8,2021.  \n## SUMMARY\n\nOn October 17,2019,respondent was convicted of a misdemeanor crimesubstantially related to the qualifications,functions,or duties of a physician andsurgeon,involving honesty.For the reasons stated in this Decision,a public reprimandis appropriate.  \n## FACTUAL FINDINGS\n\nJurisdictional Matters  \n1.On June 19,2020,the Executive Director of the Medical Board ofCalifornia (board)filed the Accusation while acting in his official capacity.  \n2.On June 28,2016,the board issued Physician's and Surgeon's CertificateNumber A 143504(Certificate)to respondent.At all times relevant to the charges inthe Accusation,the Certificate was in fullforce and effect and will expire on May 31,2022,unless renewed or revoked.  \n3.   The Accusation alleges respondent was convicted of a crime substantiallyrelated to the qualifications,functions,or duties of a physician due to her conviction ofPenal Code section 602,subdivision (k);the facts and circumstances underlying theconviction are that respondent stole merchandise of a value in excess of $950.Additionally,the Accusation alleges the above conduct constitutes violations of theMedical Practice Act and unprofessional conduct.  \n4.   In addition to her California license,respondent holds inactive licenses topractice medicine in Massachusetts and Michigan.She disclosed her conviction to the  \nagency that regulates the practice of medicine in each state.As of the date of hearingin this case,neither agency has taken disciplinary action against respondent.  \n## Conviction\n\n5.  On October 7,2019,in the case entitled People v.Yahir SantiagoLastra¹Case No.M251472,on her plea of guilty,respondent was convicted of violating PenalCode section 602,subdivision (k),trespass,a misdemeanor.  \n6.   The facts and circumstances underlying the conviction are that on May  \n13,2018,respondent stole merchandise valued at $1,000 from Rosamariposa store.  \nRespondent purchased 13 bracelets priced at $1.00 each,15 necklaces priced at  \n$1.00 each,and one bracelet priced at$16.00.She paid $47.41(including tax of $3.41)for the items.The stolen items included 17 pieces of jewelry(including necklaces,bracelets,and a ring)with various pric","cbCaijTQ5LcrOXCl","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijTQ5LcrOXCl","pdf",1245585,1,37,"English","en",105,"# Decision and Order\n## Procedural Background and Amendment\n## Summary of Conviction and Discipline Basis\n## Factual Findings and Jurisdictional Matters\n## Conviction Details\n## Respondent’s Conduct and Probation Outcomes\n## Respondent’s Explanation About Theft","[{\"question\":\"What change did the Medical Board make to the Proposed Decision?\",\"answer\":\"The Board amended the Proposed Decision to correct a clerical error that did not affect the factual or legal basis. The amendment included correcting the respondent’s name on a specified page and line.\"},{\"question\":\"What was the basis for discipline in this matter?\",\"answer\":\"The summary and factual findings describe a misdemeanor conviction for a theft offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a physician. The conduct was also alleged to violate the Medical Practice Act and constitute unprofessional conduct.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the hearing take place in 2021?\",\"answer\":\"The matter was heard by the Administrative Law Judge on July 6, 7, and 8, 2021 via videoconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Testimony and documentary evidence were received, and the record was closed for submission on July 8, 2021.\"}]","Medical Board of California Decision and Order - Decision Date and Clerical Correction | PDF",1787777816,93,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":34,"description":14,"schema_data":35,"social_meta":86,"head_meta":88,"extra_data":90,"updated_unix":28},"medical-board-of-california-decision-and-order-decision-date-and-clerical-correction","",{"@graph":36,"@context":85},[37,54,68],{"@type":38,"itemListElement":39},"BreadcrumbList",[40,44,48,51],{"item":41,"name":42,"@type":43,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":45,"name":46,"@type":43,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":49,"name":12,"@type":43,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":52,"name":13,"@type":43,"position":53},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/medical-board-of-california-decision-and-order-decision-date-and-clerical-correction/148250/",4,{"url":52,"name":13,"@type":55,"author":56,"headline":13,"publisher":58,"fileFormat":61,"inLanguage":23,"description":14,"dateModified":62,"datePublished":62,"encodingFormat":61,"isAccessibleForFree":63,"interactionStatistic":64},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":57},"Person",{"url":41,"name":59,"@type":60},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-08-26",true,{"@type":65,"interactionType":66,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":67},"ViewAction",{"@type":69,"mainEntity":70},"FAQPage",[71,77,81],{"name":72,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":74},"What change did the Medical Board make to the Proposed Decision?","Question",{"text":75,"@type":76},"The Board amended the Proposed Decision to correct a clerical error that did not affect the factual or legal basis. The amendment included correcting the respondent’s name on a specified page and line.","Answer",{"name":78,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":79},"What was the basis for discipline in this matter?",{"text":80,"@type":76},"The summary and factual findings describe a misdemeanor conviction for a theft offense substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a physician. The conduct was also alleged to violate the Medical Practice Act and constitute unprofessional conduct.",{"name":82,"@type":73,"acceptedAnswer":83},"How did the hearing take place in 2021?",{"text":84,"@type":76},"The matter was heard by the Administrative Law Judge on July 6, 7, and 8, 2021 via videoconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Testimony and documentary evidence were received, and the record was closed for submission on July 8, 2021.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":52,"og:type":87,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":59,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":89,"canonical":52},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":92},[93,97,101,105,110,115,118,123,128,131,135],{"id":20,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":94,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":96},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":47,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":53,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":112,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":11,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":12,"show_sort_weight":116,"slug":117},40,"healthcare",{"id":119,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":121,"slug":122},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":127},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":126,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":126,"slug":130},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":132,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":133,"show_sort_weight":132,"slug":134},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":136,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":46,"category_name":137,"show_sort_weight":106,"slug":138},19,"General","general"]