[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31450":3,"doc-seo-31450":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31450,1099514067415,"Rowan","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539d78ffe74a7?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779092875211072502",7,"Healthcare","Matched Comparison of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods with Traditional Growing Rods in Severe Early Onset Scoliosis","Severe early onset scoliosis (EOS) requires surgery but is difficult due to limited fixation options, very large curves, and vulnerable patients with comorbidities. Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) can avoid routine operative lengthening, yet effectiveness for severe EOS was unclear. A retrospective matched analysis of 44 children (≥90°) compared MCGR with traditional growing rods (TGR) at 2 years using EOSQ-24 and curve outcomes. MCGR achieved greater major curve correction and higher unplanned revision-free survival with no quality-of-life differences.","cbCairjp40yGF38Y","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairjp40yGF38Y","pdf",229831,1,20,"English","en","# Abstract\n## Background\n## Methods\n## Results\n## Conclusion\n# Introduction\n## Definition and challenges of early onset scoliosis\n## Growth-friendly instrumentation and traditional growing rods\n## Magnetically controlled growing rods: potential advantages and concerns","[{\"question\":\"Why is severe early onset scoliosis challenging to treat surgically?\",\"answer\":\"Severe EOS involves large curves, limited fixation points, and fragile patients with comorbidities, increasing surgical complexity and risk.\"},{\"question\":\"How did MCGR and traditional growing rods compare at the 2-year follow-up?\",\"answer\":\"At two years, mean major coronal curve angles improved more with MCGR than with TGR, and unplanned revision-free survival was higher for MCGR.\"},{\"question\":\"Were patient health-related quality of life outcomes different between groups?\",\"answer\":\"No significant differences were found in EOSQ-24 scores between the MCGR and TGR groups.\"}]",1779483731,50,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"matched-comparison-of-magnetically-controlled-growing-rods-with-traditional-growing-rods-in-severe-early-onset-scoliosis","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/matched-comparison-of-magnetically-controlled-growing-rods-with-traditional-growing-rods-in-severe-early-onset-scoliosis/31450/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"Why is severe early onset scoliosis challenging to treat surgically?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"Severe EOS involves large curves, limited fixation points, and fragile patients with comorbidities, increasing surgical complexity and risk.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How did MCGR and traditional growing rods compare at the 2-year follow-up?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"At two years, mean major coronal curve angles improved more with MCGR than with TGR, and unplanned revision-free survival was higher for MCGR.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"Were patient health-related quality of life outcomes different between groups?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"No significant differences were found in EOSQ-24 scores between the MCGR and TGR groups.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]