[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-292794-105":59,"doc-detail-292794-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","massachusetts-next-generation-accountability-system-spring-2018-agenda","Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System - Spring 2018 - Agenda","","Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System Spring 2018 outlines the agenda for redesigning school accountability under ESSA. It covers system highlights, including additional indicators, normative and criterion-referenced components, focus on raising the lowest-performing students, and replacing accountability/support levels with defined categories. The presentation details the timeline and process for stakeholder input, state plan submission and approval, model planning, regulatory amendments, and publication of results. It also specifies required accountability indicators and indicator options for non-high schools.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/massachusetts-next-generation-accountability-system-spring-2018-agenda/292794/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/massachusetts-next-generation-accountability-system-spring-2018-agenda/292794.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aurora","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-17",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What are the key system highlights in this Spring 2018 agenda?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The agenda emphasizes additional accountability indicators, the use of both normative and criterion-referenced components, and a focus on improving the performance of each school’s lowest-performing students. It also describes discontinuing prior accountability and assistance level 1–5 in favor of new accountability categories and associated support types.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the timeline & process describe implementation of the new system?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It describes stakeholder input informing the ESSA state plan design, submission of the plan to the U.S. Department of Education (USED) for review, and approval. It also notes modeling and planning, the requirement for the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education to approve proposed regulatory amendments and the district/school accountability framework, and publication of 2018 accountability results using the new system.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which accountability indicators are required under ESSA as listed in the presentation?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The presentation lists academic achievement based on annual ELA, math, and science assessments; a measure of student growth or progress for elementary and middle schools; graduation rates for high schools; progress toward English proficiency for English learners; and at least one measure of school quality or student success.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},292794,1789655737,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},4810365810221,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Massachusetts’Next-Generation Accountability System Spring 2018  \nAGENDA  \n1. System highlights  \n2. Timeline & process  \n3. Accountability indicators  \n4. Weighting of accountability indicators  \n5. Normative component  \n6. Criterion-referenced component  \n7. Categorization of schools  \n8. Categorization of districts  \n9. Reporting  \n1  System highlights  \nSystem highlights  \n• Additional accountability indicators  \no Provide information about school performance & student opportunities beyond test scores  \n• Normative & criterion-referenced components  \no Accountability percentiles & progress toward targets  \n• Focus on raising the performance of each school's lowest performing students  \no In addition to the performance of the school as a whole  \n• Discontinuation of accountability & assistance levels 1-5  \no Replaced with accountability categories that define the progress that schools are making & the type of support they may receive from the Department  \nMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education   \n2  Timeline & process  \nTimeline & process  \n|  |  | April 2016 – |  |  | April 2017 |  | \u003Cbr>September |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Decemb | er |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | October |\n| 2015\u003Cbr>•Every Stud\u003Cbr>Succeeds A\u003Cbr>(ESSA) ena | ent\u003Cbr>ct\u003Cbr>cted |  | March 2017\u003Cbr>•Stakeholder input informed ESSA state plan, including accountability system design |  |  | •State plan submitted to USED for review |  | 2017\u003Cbr>•State plan approved by USED |  |  | 2017 – present •Modeling & planning |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n\nMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education  \nSpring 2018 •Propose changes to state accountability regulations for public comment •BESE vote on proposed amendments to regulations  \nFall 2018  \n•ESE publishes 2018 accountability results for all public schools using new system  \nTimeline & process  \n• Prior to implementing the new accountability system, the Board of Elementary & Secondary Education must approve:  \no Proposed amendments to state accountability regulations  \no The framework for district & school accountability described in this presentation  \nMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education  \n3  Accountability indicators  \nRequired accountability indicators  \n• ESSA requires states to include the following indicators in an accountability system  \no Academic achievement based on annual assessments in English language arts (ELA), math, & science  \noA measure of student growth or progress for elementary & middle schools  \no Graduation rates for high schools  \no Progress in achieving English proficiency for English learners  \noAt least one measure of school quality or student success  \nMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education  \nMassachusetts’ accountability indicators – non-high schools  \n\n| Indicator | Measure |  |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Achievement | •\u003Cbr>•\u003Cbr>• | English language arts (ELA) average scaled score Mathematics average scaled score\u003Cbr>Science achievement (Composite Performance Index (CPI)) |\n| Student Growth | •\u003Cbr>• | ELA mean student growth percentile (SGP) Mathematics mean SGP |\n| English Language Proficiency | • | Progress made by students towards attaining English language proficiency (percentage of students meeting annual targets required in order to attain English proficiency in six years) |\n| Additional Indicator(s) | • | Chronic absenteeism (percentage of students missing 10 percent or more of their days in membership) |\n\nMassachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education","cbCaid7r6H7jE3Sl","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaid7r6H7jE3Sl","pdf",409541,48,"English","# Agenda\n## System highlights\n## Timeline & process\n## Accountability indicators\n## Weighting of accountability indicators\n## Normative component\n## Criterion-referenced component\n## Categorization of schools\n## Categorization of districts\n## Reporting","[{\"question\":\"What are the key system highlights in this Spring 2018 agenda?\",\"answer\":\"The agenda emphasizes additional accountability indicators, the use of both normative and criterion-referenced components, and a focus on improving the performance of each school’s lowest-performing students. It also describes discontinuing prior accountability and assistance level 1–5 in favor of new accountability categories and associated support types.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the timeline \\u0026 process describe implementation of the new system?\",\"answer\":\"It describes stakeholder input informing the ESSA state plan design, submission of the plan to the U.S. Department of Education (USED) for review, and approval. It also notes modeling and planning, the requirement for the Board of Elementary \\u0026 Secondary Education to approve proposed regulatory amendments and the district/school accountability framework, and publication of 2018 accountability results using the new system.\"},{\"question\":\"Which accountability indicators are required under ESSA as listed in the presentation?\",\"answer\":\"The presentation lists academic achievement based on annual ELA, math, and science assessments; a measure of student growth or progress for elementary and middle schools; graduation rates for high schools; progress toward English proficiency for English learners; and at least one measure of school quality or student success.\"}]","Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System - Spring 2018 - Agenda | PDF",121]