[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-30616":3,"doc-seo-30616":21},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"update_tm":20},30616,962075114101,"Seraphina","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/e000253a75eb197efd?_k=1776739308162644532",8,"Research & Report","MANUFACTURING CASE STUDY","This document outlines a case study for Duncan Supply Company, Inc. regarding Research and Development (R&D) tax credits. It details the assignment to analyze, substantiate, and document the company's R&D activities, requiring a comprehensive report. The report must extensively cover the types of expenses that qualify for the R&D credit and specific R&D activities relevant to a manufacturing client. Additionally, it includes notes from the company president on a specific project involving an L-shaped cooler. The project faced challenges with the L-shaped box design, particularly incorporating a glass wall and window, which necessitated numerous revisions due to fluctuating load requirements. The goal was to maintain a temperature of approximately 34 degrees Fahrenheit without freezing the beer in the walk-in cooler. The process involved further load testing and collaboration with the cooler manufacturer for a redesign based on a new drawing. Changes to the structure, moving from a standard wall to glass, altered the load calculations and required accounting for the cooler's lower efficiency. The case study also prompts for the identification of the primary technical challenge in this project and an explanation of the derived solution, to be detailed in two to three paragraphs.","cbCaibkqJm8ODhvM","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaibkqJm8ODhvM","pdf",197735,1,1778288069,{"code":4,"msg":22,"data":23},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":25,"slug":26,"title":13,"keywords":27,"description":14,"schema_data":28,"social_meta":62,"head_meta":64,"extra_data":66,"updated_unix":20},105,"en","manufacturing-case-study","",{"@graph":29,"@context":61},[30,47],{"@type":31,"itemListElement":32},"BreadcrumbList",[33,37,41,44],{"item":34,"name":35,"@type":36,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":38,"name":39,"@type":36,"position":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":42,"name":12,"@type":36,"position":43},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":45,"name":13,"@type":36,"position":46},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/manufacturing-case-study/30616",4,{"url":45,"name":13,"@type":48,"author":49,"headline":13,"publisher":51,"fileFormat":54,"description":14,"dateModified":55,"datePublished":55,"encodingFormat":54,"isAccessibleForFree":56,"interactionStatistic":57},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":50},"Person",{"url":34,"name":52,"@type":53},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-09",true,{"@type":58,"interactionType":59,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":60},"ViewAction","https://schema.org",{"og:url":45,"og:type":63,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":52,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":65,"canonical":45},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]