[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-595306-105":59,"doc-detail-595306-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","managements-rapacious-quest-for-control-a-case-study-of-affirmative-action-programs-for-academics","Management's rapacious quest for control - A case study of affirmative action programs for academics","","The text examines how affirmative action legislation shapes hiring, promotion, and equal employment practices within an academic university structure. It outlines legal requirements under anti-discrimination and equal opportunity statutes, then highlights that earlier frameworks addressed systemic discrimination while leaving staffing expectations unclear. Against this backdrop, it evaluates whether the objectives of the 1986 affirmative action regime are realized in academic employment decisions and management planning, including efforts to reduce disparities affecting women.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/managements-rapacious-quest-for-control-a-case-study-of-affirmative-action-programs-for-academics/595306/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/managements-rapacious-quest-for-control-a-case-study-of-affirmative-action-programs-for-academics/595306.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Blitz","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem does the text identify before the affirmative action legislation takes effect?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It points to systemic discrimination concerns and a lack of understanding about what “affirmative action” required, alongside ad hoc decisions about compliance and limited guidance on staffing.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Which legal instruments are referenced as shaping employment obligations?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The text cites anti-discrimination and equal opportunity statutes, including the Equal Employment Opportunity for Women Act 1986 and related provisions on direct and indirect discrimination.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the paper set out to evaluate?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It assesses whether the objectives of the new affirmative action legislation are being realized within the academic employment structure of a single university.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},595306,1792768408,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":81,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":39,"preview_page_count":4},24464137899374,"https://us-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","| Tabie 1  \u003Cbr>The Number and Percentage of Female and Male Staif in  \u003Cbr>Academic Faculties at the University in 1984 by number  \u003Cbr>and percentage with positions of senior ectureship  \u003Cbr>and above and lectureship and above;   |\n| --- |\n| Faculty  \u003Cbr>Tota!  \u003Cbr>Male  \u003Cbr>Female  \u003Cbr>No,  \u003Cbr>No.  \u003Cbr>No.  \u003Cbr>%  \u003Cbr>%   |\n| 3,  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>97.0  \u003Cbr>2.9  \u003Cbr>67  \u003Cbr>2  \u003Cbr>69  \u003Cbr>126  \u003Cbr>88.9  \u003Cbr>14  \u003Cbr>112  \u003Cbr>11.1  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>84  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>65.3  \u003Cbr>246  \u003Cbr>162  \u003Cbr>34.2  \u003Cbr>2.  \u003Cbr>34  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>34  \u003Cbr>0.0  \u003Cbr>0  \u003Cbr>100.0  \u003Cbr>3.8  \u003Cbr>96.2  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>2  \u003Cbr>52  \u003Cbr>56  \u003Cbr>79  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>67.0  \u003Cbr>33.0  \u003Cbr>39  \u003Cbr>118  \u003Cbr>3.  \u003Cbr>95.9  \u003Cbr>4.1  \u003Cbr>1  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>23  \u003Cbr>24  \u003Cbr>5  \u003Cbr>89.8  \u003Cbr>10.2  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>49  \u003Cbr>44  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>104  \u003Cbr>64.4  \u003Cbr>69  \u003Cbr>33.6  \u003Cbr>35  \u003Cbr>4.  \u003Cbr>100.0  \u003Cbr>0.0  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>6  \u003Cbr>6  \u003Cbr>0  \u003Cbr>100.0  \u003Cbr>0.0  \u003Cbr>0  \u003Cbr>13  \u003Cbr>13  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>82.9  \u003Cbr>17.1  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>35  \u003Cbr>6  \u003Cbr>41  \u003Cbr>5.  \u003Cbr>95.5  \u003Cbr>4.5  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>21  \u003Cbr>22  \u003Cbr>1  \u003Cbr>8.6  \u003Cbr>32  \u003Cbr>35  \u003Cbr>3  \u003Cbr>91.4  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>137  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>66.5  \u003Cbr>206  \u003Cbr>69  \u003Cbr>33.5  \u003Cbr>6.  \u003Cbr>4.0  \u003Cbr>47  \u003Cbr>49  \u003Cbr>96.0  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>2  \u003Cbr>62  \u003Cbr>5  \u003Cbr>92.0  \u003Cbr>8.0  \u003Cbr>57  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>27.4  \u003Cbr>55  \u003Cbr>201  \u003Cbr>72.6  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>146  \u003Cbr>Al Faculties  \u003Cbr>Senior Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>2.9  \u003Cbr>6  \u003Cbr>198  \u003Cbr>204  \u003Cbr>97.1  \u003Cbr>29  \u003Cbr>8.5  \u003Cbr>Lectureship and above  \u003Cbr>310  \u003Cbr>91.5  \u003Cbr>339  \u003Cbr>Total  \u003Cbr>288  \u003Cbr>628  \u003Cbr>31.5  \u003Cbr>916  \u003Cbr>68.5   |\n\nManagement's rapacious quest for control:A case study of affirmative action programs foracademics  \nM.E.●'Connor  \n# Introduction\n\nDiscrimination Act 1977 are not inconsistent  \n(1984)EOC 92-023,Metwally v University  \nwith S8(1)or the purpose of the Affirmative  \nof Wollongong(1984)EOC 92-030,Hill v  \nSince December 1983 universities and  \nAction (Equal Employment Opportunity for  \nWater Resources Commission(1985)EOC  \ncolleges of advanced education in New  \nWomen)Act 1986.  \n92-127,and disputes within the University,  \nSouth Wales are required by Part 1XA Anti-  \nPrior to this legislation,Commonwealth  \nwere sufficient to guarantee that affirmative  \nDiscrimination Act 1977 to research the  \nlegislation made direct racial discrimination  \naction,anti-discrimination and equal oppor-  \nextent of discrimination and prepare an  \nan offence,S9 Race Discrimination Act1975.Direct and indireet discrimination on  \ntunity were issues within the Unversity.Second,there appeared to be a basic lack of  \nequal opportunity nanagement plan  \n(a)to eliminate and ensure the absence of  \nthe grounds of sex,marital status and preg-  \nunderstanding of what was required or what  \ndiscrimination in employment on the  \nnancy was also an ofence under ss6,7,and  \nwas meant by affirmative action,discrimina-  \ngrounds of race,sex,marital status  \n8 Sex Discrimination Act 1984.In New  \ntion and equal opportunity.Third,ad hoc  \nand physical impairment;and  \nSouth Wales,the Anti-Discrimination Act  \ndecisions were being made under the rubric  \n(b)to promote equal employment oppor-  \n1977 made direct and indirect discrimination  \nof cormplying,or being seen to comply,with  \ntunity for women,members of racial  \nthe purpose of such legislation³.Fourth,it  \non the grounds of race,age,sex,marital  \nninorities and physically handicapped  \nwas being rumoured by some that positive  \nstatus,physical impairment,intellectual im-  \npersons.  \npairment and homosexuality an offence.  \ndiscrimination was taking place in the  \n(S122C Anti-Discrimination Act 1977)  \nThese Acts did not outline any statutory  \nrecruitment and pronotion of employees onthe basis of sex,while ignoring other criter","cbCaim3zMc4hKnJg","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaim3zMc4hKnJg","pdf",413050,"English","# Introduction\n## Legal background and compliance requirements\n## Systemic discrimination and workplace decision-making\n## Objective assessment within university academics","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the text identify before the affirmative action legislation takes effect?\",\"answer\":\"It points to systemic discrimination concerns and a lack of understanding about what “affirmative action” required, alongside ad hoc decisions about compliance and limited guidance on staffing.\"},{\"question\":\"Which legal instruments are referenced as shaping employment obligations?\",\"answer\":\"The text cites anti-discrimination and equal opportunity statutes, including the Equal Employment Opportunity for Women Act 1986 and related provisions on direct and indirect discrimination.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the paper set out to evaluate?\",\"answer\":\"It assesses whether the objectives of the new affirmative action legislation are being realized within the academic employment structure of a single university.\"}]","Management's rapacious quest for control - A case study of affirmative action programs for academics | PDF",1792080842]