[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-497937-105":59,"doc-detail-497937-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","management-scenarios-candidate-report-edition-2012-managerial-judgement-feedback","Management Scenarios Candidate Report - Edition 2012 - Managerial Judgement Feedback","","Report assessing managerial judgement based on responses to Scenarios work situations, using effectiveness ratings compared with an appropriate comparison group. Explains that ideal answers were derived from managerial expert opinions and validated across 20+ research studies with 16,000+ managers and professionals. Provides confidentiality guidance and a shelf life of 18–24 months. Interprets results across the overall judgement scale and three sub-scales: Managing Objectives, People Management, and Reputation Management.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/management-scenarios-candidate-report-edition-2012-managerial-judgement-feedback/497937/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/management-scenarios-candidate-report-edition-2012-managerial-judgement-feedback/497937.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"dawugda","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-10-02",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does the Scenarios test measure in this report?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It measures an individual’s ability to evaluate real-life managerial situations and choose appropriate, effective responses, based on ratings compared to a comparison group.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How is managerial judgement scored and broken down?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The overall managerial judgement scale is assessed and then split into three sub-scales: Managing Objectives, People Management, and Reputation Management, scored against correct answers.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the report advise if improvement is indicated?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"It suggests considering the longer-term consequences of actions, experimenting with suggestions in the report, and being responsive to feedback.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},497937,1791504812,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},3985747870947,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","Scenarios  \nManagement Scenarios Candidate Report  \nName  \nMr Sample Candidate  \nDate  \n03 October 2018  \n[SHL.com](SHL.com)  \nIntroduction  \nIncreasingly managerial judgement is seen as an important skill for individuals in organisations, regardless of whether they have the formal job title of ‘manager’. The Scenarios test assesses Managerial Judgement – an individual’s ability to evaluate ‘real-life’ managerial situations and decide on appropriate and effective ways of handling them. It assesses an individual’s current level of judgement, but it can also be used to provide feedback on how to improve performance in this area.  \nThe ideal answers to the test’s questions have been derived from the opinions of managerial experts and then validated by over 20 different research studies involving more than 16,000 managers and professionals from 8 different world regions. In general terms, those with more Managerial Judgement focus on the big picture, delegate, tackle staff issues and place the needs of the organisation ahead of their own and immediate team’s needs.  \nThis report is based upon your performance on Scenarios. It measures your ability to deal effectively with a range of managerial situations by presenting you with a number of different work scenarios followed by a number of possible responses and asking you to rate each of the responses for their effectiveness in dealing with that scenario. Your responses have been compared with those of a large and appropriate comparison group.  \nThe report should be treated confidentially. The shelf life of the information contained in this report is considered to be 18-24 months, depending upon your work role and personal circumstances.  \nCOMPARISON GROUP  \nScenarios Management Edition 2012: UK Group  \nMANAGERIAL JUDGEMENT AND SUBSCALES  \nThe overall Managerial Judgement scale provides an assessment of your current level of judgement. Individuals who score strongly on the scale are demonstrating practical managerial skills, and are therefore more likely to cope well with the demands of a real life managerial role.  \nThis scale is then broken down into three areas, or sub-scales, Managing Objectives, People Management and Reputation Management. Each of these sub-scales examines Managerial Judgement in a more specific area than the overall scale.  \nThese three sub-scales and the overall scale are scored against a set of correct answers. Research shows that the nearer an individual’s responses are to these correct answers, the higher their level of managerial effectiveness will be.  \nManagerial Judgement  \nLow Medium High  \nEffectively weighing up managerial  \nLess effective at weighing up  \nsituations and deciding on ways of  \nmanagerial situations.  \n handling them.  \nThe overall Managerial Judgement scale provides an assessment of your current level of judgement. Individuals who score strongly on the scale are demonstrating practical managerial skills, and are therefore more likely to cope well with the demands of a real life managerial role.  \nTaking into account your responses to all the questions in the test, and comparing you with the group, the indication is that there is considerable scope for you to develop your managerial judgement. This may be because you have had little experience of dealing with real-life managerial situations, or perhaps because you tend not to reflect greatly on the impact of your actions as a manager. Alternatively, because your current role may be making it difficult for you to manage effectively, you may have picked up some bad habits. Regardless of the reason, you need to consider the longer-term consequences of your actions on the systems and people around you. Try experimenting with some of the suggestions in this report and being responsive to feedback.  \nManaging Objectives  \nLess effective use of one’s energies at work. Less emphasis on wider organisational objectivesand delegation.  \nLow Medium High  \nMaking the best possible use of one’s ene","cbCaia2STFz5Kmbe","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaia2STFz5Kmbe","pdf",405901,14,"English","# Introduction\n# Comparison Group\n# Managerial Judgement and Subscales\n## Managing Objectives\n## People Management\n## Reputation Management","[{\"question\":\"What does the Scenarios test measure in this report?\",\"answer\":\"It measures an individual’s ability to evaluate real-life managerial situations and choose appropriate, effective responses, based on ratings compared to a comparison group.\"},{\"question\":\"How is managerial judgement scored and broken down?\",\"answer\":\"The overall managerial judgement scale is assessed and then split into three sub-scales: Managing Objectives, People Management, and Reputation Management, scored against correct answers.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the report advise if improvement is indicated?\",\"answer\":\"It suggests considering the longer-term consequences of actions, experimenting with suggestions in the report, and being responsive to feedback.\"}]","Management Scenarios Candidate Report - Edition 2012 - Managerial Judgement Feedback | PDF",1790971926,35]