[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-488715-105":59,"doc-detail-488715-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","maintenance-employee-performance-review-core-performance-expectations","Maintenance - Employee Performance Review - Core Performance Expectations","","Maintenance Employee Performance Review evaluates an employee’s core performance expectations across work quality/quantity, work attitude, work habits, and personal characteristics. Ratings are determined from observations and interactions by the Assistant Director of Buildings and Grounds and the Building Principal. The form includes itemized criteria such as sound judgment, accuracy, initiative, dependability, self-improvement, adherence to schedules, effective communication, integrity, emotional stability, and adaptability. It also records evaluator comments, recommendations for Custodian I/II training, and required signatures confirming the review was discussed.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/maintenance-employee-performance-review-core-performance-expectations/488715/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/maintenance-employee-performance-review-core-performance-expectations/488715.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"404brain","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-10-01",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How are the ratings determined on this review form?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Ratings are based on input from the Assistant Director of Buildings and Grounds and the Building Principal, using observations and interactions with the employee.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What categories of performance are evaluated?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The form evaluates work quality/quantity, work attitude, work habits, and personal characteristics, each with rating options.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the form handle recommendations for Custodian I or II training?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"A dedicated section uses the employee’s performance, work ethic, attitude, and interpersonal skills to indicate whether the employee should be sent to Custodian II, Custodian I, is not a candidate, or if it is not applicable.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},488715,1791024516,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":19,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":52,"preview_page_count":4},1099529839291,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","Maintenance Employee Performance Review: Core Performance Expectations  \nEmployee Name: Evaluation Date:  \nJob Title: Type of Review:  \nBldg:  \nThe ratings will be determined based on input from the Assistant Director of Buildings and Grounds and the Building Principal based on observations and interactions with the employee.  \n\n| Work Quality/Quantity: | Exceeds\u003Cbr>Expectation | Meets Expectations | Developing or Needs\u003Cbr>Improvement | Unsatisfactory |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Fulfills work assignments/requirements |  |  |  |  |\n| Uses Sound Judgement |  |  |  |  |\n| Performs job accurately |  |  |  |  |\n| Demonstrates ability to work without supervision as needed |  |  |  |  |\n| Shows pride in work performed |  |  |  |  |\n| Evaluator Comments: |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| Work Attitude: | Exceeds\u003Cbr>Expectation | Meets Expectations | Developing or Needs\u003Cbr>Improvement | Unsatisfactory |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Shows initiative |  |  |  |  |\n| Is dependable |  |  |  |  |\n| Accepts direction without resentment |  |  |  |  |\n| Cooperates with others |  |  |  |  |\n| Cooperates with others |  |  |  |  |\n| Evaluator Comments: |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| Work Habits: | Exceeds\u003Cbr>Expectation | Meets Expectations | Developing or Needs\u003Cbr>Improvement | Unsatisfactory |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Takes advantage of opportunities for self-improvement |  |  |  |  |\n| Conforms to work hours |  |  |  |  |\n| Observes established lunch and/or break periods |  |  |  |  |\n| Limits personal business and visits to non-work hours |  |  |  |  |\n| Uses work time wisely and appropriately |  |  |  |  |\n| Evaluator Comments: |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| Personal Characteristics: | Exceeds\u003Cbr>Expectation | Meets Expectations | Developing or Needs\u003Cbr>Improvement | Unsatisfactory |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Shows logic and reasoning |  |  |  |  |\n| Maintains emotional stability and poise |  |  |  |  |\n| Demonstrates honesty and integrity |  |  |  |  |\n| Communicates effectively with others |  |  |  |  |\n| Adapts to changes in routine |  |  |  |  |\n| Dresses appropriately for work assignments |  |  |  |  |\n| Shows consideration and respect for others |  |  |  |  |\n| Evaluator Comments: |  |  |  |  |\n\nAssistant Director of Buildings and Grounds Comments:  \nBuilding Principal’s Comments:  \nEvaluators’ Recommendation:  \nFor Employees Who Have Not Attended Custodian I or II Training:  \n\n| Based on the employee’s performance, work ethic, attitude, and interpersonal skills he/she: |  |\n| --- | --- |\n|  | Would not be a candidate for Custodian I or II training at this time. |\n|  | Should be sent to Custodian II training. |\n|  | Should be sent to Custodian I training. |\n|  | Not Applicable. |\n\nEmployee Signature:   Date:    \nAssistant Director of Buildings  \nand Grounds Signature:   Date:    \nBuilding Principal Signature:   Date:    \nSignature indicates that the written evaluation has been reviewed and discussed. My signature means that I have been advised of my performance and does not necessarily mean that I agree with this evaluation or feedback about my  \nperformance.","cbCaiqHKrucq1VDc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqHKrucq1VDc","pdf",141179,"English","# Core Performance Expectations\n## Work Quality/Quantity\n## Work Attitude\n## Work Habits\n## Personal Characteristics\n## Evaluator Comments and Recommendations\n## Training Recommendation for Custodian I or II","[{\"question\":\"How are the ratings determined on this review form?\",\"answer\":\"Ratings are based on input from the Assistant Director of Buildings and Grounds and the Building Principal, using observations and interactions with the employee.\"},{\"question\":\"What categories of performance are evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"The form evaluates work quality/quantity, work attitude, work habits, and personal characteristics, each with rating options.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the form handle recommendations for Custodian I or II training?\",\"answer\":\"A dedicated section uses the employee’s performance, work ethic, attitude, and interpersonal skills to indicate whether the employee should be sent to Custodian II, Custodian I, is not a candidate, or if it is not applicable.\"}]","Maintenance - Employee Performance Review - Core Performance Expectations | PDF",1790816401]