[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31452":3,"doc-seo-31452":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31452,13056703019404,"Miles","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0",7,"Healthcare","Magnetically Controlled Rod Fracture Relates to Rod Diameter","Quantifying rod-fracture risk after growth-friendly early-onset scoliosis (EOS) surgery, this study compares magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) with traditional growing rods (TGR) and evaluates how rod diameter influences fracture. Data from a large multinational Pediatric Spine Study Group registry include EOS patients with ≥2 years follow-up. Rods were analyzed by diameter (≤5 mm vs >5 mm) and by implant type using chi-squared, Mann–Whitney U, and 5-year log-rank survival methods.","cbCaic7CR4v7u2ds","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaic7CR4v7u2ds","pdf",767708,1,8,"English","en","# Abstract\n## Purpose\n## Methods\n## Results\n## Conclusion\n# Introduction\n# Methods","[{\"question\":\"What was the main purpose of the study?\",\"answer\":\"To quantify rod-fracture risk after growth-friendly EOS surgery, compare fracture risk between MCGR and TGR, and assess fracture risk by rod diameter.\"},{\"question\":\"How were MCGR and TGR patients identified and analyzed?\",\"answer\":\"EOS patients with TGR or MCGR instrumentation were drawn from the Pediatric Spine Study Group registry. Analyses compared groups using chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests, and survival analysis over 5 years was used to address follow-up differences.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the key findings about 2-year rod fracture risk?\",\"answer\":\"The overall 2-year fracture risk was 3.05%. TGR had a higher 2-year fracture risk than MCGR (4.96% vs 1.82%, p \\u003c 0.001). Among MCGR constructs, rod diameters ≤5 mm fractured at higher rates than those \\u003e5 mm.\"}]",1779483733,20,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":25},105,"magnetically-controlled-rod-fracture-relates-to-rod-diameter","",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/magnetically-controlled-rod-fracture-relates-to-rod-diameter/31452/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What was the main purpose of the study?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"To quantify rod-fracture risk after growth-friendly EOS surgery, compare fracture risk between MCGR and TGR, and assess fracture risk by rod diameter.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How were MCGR and TGR patients identified and analyzed?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"EOS patients with TGR or MCGR instrumentation were drawn from the Pediatric Spine Study Group registry. Analyses compared groups using chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests, and survival analysis over 5 years was used to address follow-up differences.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What were the key findings about 2-year rod fracture risk?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"The overall 2-year fracture risk was 3.05%. TGR had a higher 2-year fracture risk than MCGR (4.96% vs 1.82%, p \u003C 0.001). Among MCGR constructs, rod diameters ≤5 mm fractured at higher rates than those >5 mm.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]