[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33456-en":3,"doc-seo-33456-105":30},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":21,"is_downloadable":21,"audit_status":21,"page_count":22,"language":23,"language_code":24,"site_id":25,"html_lang":24,"table_of_contents":26,"faqs":27,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":28,"read_time":29},33456,8796095462418,"Noah","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80000253c1241d02b47?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778826106357471780",8,"Research & Report","M R Bennett P M S Hacker Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience","Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience explores conceptual commitments that structure neuroscience research, focusing on how scientific explanations, models, and measurements relate to mental life, agency, and biological function. It examines the kinds of claims neuroscience can legitimately make, clarifies common category confusions, and assesses the role of mechanistic and explanatory frameworks. The work emphasizes careful distinctions in methodology and interpretation so that conclusions about the brain remain precise, warranted, and philosophically defensible.","","cbCaigoQxFrcxPYj","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigoQxFrcxPYj","pdf",3563556,2,1,564,"English","en",105,"# Conceptual Foundations\n## Scientific Explanation and Interpretation\n# Methodology and Reasoning\n## Models, Measurements, and Legitimate Claims\n# Conceptual Clarifications\n## Avoiding Category Confusions\n# Evaluation of Frameworks\n## Mechanistic Approaches and Philosophical Defense","[{\"question\":\"What is the main focus of Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience?\",\"answer\":\"The document concentrates on the philosophical foundations that underlie neuroscience: how explanations, models, and interpretations should be understood and assessed.\"},{\"question\":\"How does it address what neuroscience can legitimately claim?\",\"answer\":\"It emphasizes making only warranted scientific conclusions, clarifying the difference between description, explanation, and philosophical inference.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does the text stress conceptual distinctions?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that misunderstandings often come from category confusions, so careful distinctions help keep neuroscientific interpretations precise and defensible.\"}]",1782210431,1421,{"code":4,"msg":31,"data":32},"ok",{"site_id":25,"language":24,"slug":33,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":34,"social_meta":85,"head_meta":87,"extra_data":89,"updated_unix":28},"m-r-bennett-p-m-s-hacker-philosophical-foundations-of-neuroscience",{"@graph":35,"@context":84},[36,52,67],{"@type":37,"itemListElement":38},"BreadcrumbList",[39,43,46,49],{"item":40,"name":41,"@type":42,"position":21},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":44,"name":45,"@type":42,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":42,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":42,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/m-r-bennett-p-m-s-hacker-philosophical-foundations-of-neuroscience/33456/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"inLanguage":24,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":61,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":62,"interactionStatistic":63},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":40,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-07-04","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":64,"interactionType":65,"userInteractionCount":20},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":66},"ViewAction",{"@type":68,"mainEntity":69},"FAQPage",[70,76,80],{"name":71,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":73},"What is the main focus of Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience?","Question",{"text":74,"@type":75},"The document concentrates on the philosophical foundations that underlie neuroscience: how explanations, models, and interpretations should be understood and assessed.","Answer",{"name":77,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":78},"How does it address what neuroscience can legitimately claim?",{"text":79,"@type":75},"It emphasizes making only warranted scientific conclusions, clarifying the difference between description, explanation, and philosophical inference.",{"name":81,"@type":72,"acceptedAnswer":82},"Why does the text stress conceptual distinctions?",{"text":83,"@type":75},"It argues that misunderstandings often come from category confusions, so careful distinctions help keep neuroscientific interpretations precise and defensible.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":86,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":88,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":25}]