[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-178610-105":59,"doc-detail-178610-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","lsat-logic-games-questions","LSAT - Logic Games Questions","","LSAT题目材料聚焦于逻辑推理与论证能力训练，涵盖符号逻辑蕴含关系、条件命题的逆否与等价推导、削弱因果主张的替代解释分析，以及基于“如果-那么”结构的推理对应。内容通过多选题呈现常见逻辑陷阱，例如后因前果的推断、结论自相矛盾与前提无法推出结论的问题，并要求考生选择最贴近题干论证机制的选项。",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/lsat-logic-games-questions/178610/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/lsat-logic-games-questions/178610.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Melati","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-09","2026-09-02",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Question 4的符号逻辑题考点是什么？","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"考点是从(Student(x)→Eligible(x))推导“not eligible”对应的结论，即“not eligible → not student”，从而确定正确选项。","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Question 5为什么需要假设与环境温度相关的前提？",{"text":117,"@type":113},"论证把羽毛与保暖（隔热）联系起来，前提是羽毛发现于温带地区且当时足够冷，因此需要假设该温带环境确实寒冷。",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Question 10中“结论自相矛盾”体现在哪？",{"text":121,"@type":113},"结论宣称“有些员工既是员工又不是员工”，直接构成自相矛盾；因此答案指出论证无效，且前提也不足以推出该结论。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},178610,1788332560,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":41},962085570644,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_994ba38a5ba835b3df7d355c54d3ed8d","| Question: 4\u003Cbr>Symbolic rule: 􀀀 x (Student(x) → Eligible(x)) . A person is not eligible. What follows?\u003Cbr>A. Person is a student.\u003Cbr>B. Person is not a student.\u003Cbr>C. Person is partially a student.\u003Cbr>D. Person may be a student.\u003Cbr>E. Eligibility is unrelated.\u003Cbr>Answer: B\u003Cbr>Explanation: Student → Eligible. Not eligible → not student. |\n| --- |\n| Question: 5\u003Cbr>Paleontologist: The discovery of a feathered dinosaur fossil in a region that was once temperate suggests that feathers originally evolved for insulation rather than for flight. If feathers had evolved for flight, we would expect the earliest feathered dinosaurs to be found in environments where flight would provide a distinct predatory advantage.\u003Cbr>The paleontologist ’s argument depends on assuming which of the following?\u003Cbr>A. Early dinosaurs did not inhabit tropical environments where flight would be advantageous.\u003Cbr>B. Insulation is a more biologically complex function for feathers than the mechanics offlight.\u003Cbr>C. Predatory advantage is the only reason a species would develop the biological capacity for flight.\u003Cbr>D. Temperate environments 150 million years ago were cold enough to require biological insulation.\u003Cbr>E. The fossil found represents one of the earliest species of dinosaurs to ever develop feathers.\u003Cbr>Answer: D\u003Cbr>Explanation: The argument links feathers to insulation because they were found in a temperate region. This only makes sense if those temperate regions were actually cold. If the temperate regions were warm, the \"insulation\" theory would have no environmental basis. The argument requires the assumption that the environment necessitated warmth-retention. |\n\n\n| Question: 9\u003Cbr>A public health official argues that a community’s rise in asthma cases was caused by a nearby factory because cases increased after the factory opened. Which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?\u003Cbr>A. The factory began operating during the same month that pollen counts reached a five-year high.\u003Cbr>B. Some residents disliked the factory because it was noisy.\u003Cbr>C. Asthma cases were higher among children than adults.\u003Cbr>D. The factory hired many local workers.\u003Cbr>E. The community had no previous factory nearby.\u003Cbr>Answer: A\u003Cbr>Explanation: If pollen counts were unusually high at the same time, that provides a strong alternative explanation for the rise in asthma cases. The argument relies on post hoc reasoning, and the seasonal pollen surge undercuts the causal link. |\n| --- |\n| Question: 10\u003Cbr>All employees who completed cybersecurity training can access the secure portal. Some people who can access the secure portal are not employees. Therefore, some employees who completed cybersecurity training are not employees. Which of the following best evaluates the argument?\u003Cbr>A. Valid, because secure access implies employment.\u003Cbr>B. Invalid, because the conclusion is unsupported and self-contradictory.\u003Cbr>C. Valid, because some portal users are not employees.\u003Cbr>D. Invalid, because all trained employees can access the portal.\u003Cbr>E. Valid only if contractors also received training.\u003Cbr>Answer: B\u003Cbr>Explanation: The conclusion states that some employees are not employees, which is self-contradictory. Even aside from that, the premises do not establish such a result. The argument is logically defective. |\n\n\n| Question: 12\u003Cbr>A security analyst argues: “Whenever confidential intelligence systems are compromised, emergency cybersecurity protocols activate automatically.” A government official concludes that because emergency cybersecurity protocols activated automatically, confidential intelligence systems must have been compromised.\u003Cbr>Which of the following most closely parallels the official’s reasoning?\u003Cbr>A. Whenever manufacturing defects emerge, product recalls increase substantially. Product recalls increased after safety inspections intensified.\u003Cbr>B. Whenever public corruption investigations expand, political resignations increase rapidly. Political resign","cbCaios3Y11EGJKY","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaios3Y11EGJKY","pdf",984598,12,"English","# Question 4\n## Symbolic rule and eligibility\n# Question 5\n## Paleontologist argument and assumptions\n# Question 9\n## Public health causation and weakening\n# Question 10\n## Cybersecurity training argument evaluation\n# Question 12\n## Protocol activation and parallel reasoning","[{\"question\":\"Question 4的符号逻辑题考点是什么？\",\"answer\":\"考点是从(Student(x)→Eligible(x))推导“not eligible”对应的结论，即“not eligible → not student”，从而确定正确选项。\"},{\"question\":\"Question 5为什么需要假设与环境温度相关的前提？\",\"answer\":\"论证把羽毛与保暖（隔热）联系起来，前提是羽毛发现于温带地区且当时足够冷，因此需要假设该温带环境确实寒冷。\"},{\"question\":\"Question 10中“结论自相矛盾”体现在哪？\",\"answer\":\"结论宣称“有些员工既是员工又不是员工”，直接构成自相矛盾；因此答案指出论证无效，且前提也不足以推出该结论。\"}]","LSAT - Logic Games Questions | PDF"]