[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-296975-105":59,"doc-detail-296975-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","lnat-technical-report-september-2014-june-2015-final","LNAT Technical Report September 2014 - June 2015 - Final","","LNAT Technical Report September 2014 – June 2015 documents statistical analyses for the LNAT examination administration, covering candidates, exam results, and item performance. The report summarizes equating and calibration work completed in October 2014 using a calibration sample, then describes outcomes from the full 1st September 2014–30th June 2015 cohort of 6,992 candidates. Key findings address equating success, moderate reliability (0.64–0.76), and item-level underperformance with implications for improving item-writing and reporting.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/lnat-technical-report-september-2014-june-2015-final/296975/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/lnat-technical-report-september-2014-june-2015-final/296975.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aladdin","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What period does the LNAT Technical Report cover?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It covers the administration of the LNAT examination from 1st September 2014 to 30th June 2015.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How were items calibrated and forms equated?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Item calibration and form equating were carried out in October 2014 using a sample of candidates who sat the exam between 1st September 2014 and 4th October 2014.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What conclusions are drawn about equating and reliability?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The report concludes that equating was successful and that reliability was moderately good, ranging between 0.64 and 0.76.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},296975,1790053207,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":46,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":31,"preview_page_count":4},2336478503145,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","LNAT  \nTechnical Report September 2014 – June 2015  \nPrepared by:  \nStefan Bondorowicz. DPhil.  \nJuly 2015  \n\n| Version | Date | Description |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| 0.2 | 24/07/2015 | First Draft – S Bondorowicz |\n| 0.3 | 27/07/2015 | SB |\n| 0.5 | 30/07/2015 | ~~ ~~Final Draft Edits-SB |\n| 0.7 | 12/08/2015 | Edited – Catherine Waring |\n| 1.0 | 17/08/2015 | Final Edit-SB |\n|  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |\n|  |  |  |\n\nThis document contains confidential and/or proprietary information concerning Pearson’s services, products, data security procedures, data storage parameters and data retrieval processes. You are permitted to use or disclose any Sponsor-owned data contained in this report. You are also permitted to view and retain this document provided that you disclose no Pearson confidential and/or proprietary information contained herein to any outside agent or employee, except those agents and employees directly charged with reviewing this information. These agents and employees should be instructed and agree not to disclose any Pearson owned confidential and/or proprietary information for any purposes beyond the terms stipulated in the agreement of your company or agency with Pearson.  \nCopyright © [2011] Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. PEARSON logo is a trademark in the U.S. and/or other countries.  \nScope of Work ............................................................................................................................................................2  \nExecutive Summary...................................................................................................................................................2  \nBackground.................................................................................................................................................................2  \nDemographics ............................................................................................................................................................3  \nExamination Statistics ..............................................................................................................................................3  \nScale Scores ...............................................................................................................................................................4  \nImpact Analysis ..........................................................................................................................................................5  \nItem Statistics .............................................................................................................................................................8  \nAppendix 1 – Demographic Breakdown of Candidate Totals............................................................................9  \nAppendix 2 – Item Analysis by Forms .................................................................................................................13  \nThis technical report provides statistical information regarding the administration of the LNAT examination. The dates of administration were 1st September 2014 – 30th June 2015. A summary of the statistical analyses for candidates, exam results and items are presented in this report.  \nExecutive Summary  \nThe  \n30th  \n622  \nLNAT examination was completed by 6 ,992 candidates during the period of 1st September 2014 – June 2015. Item calibration and form equating were carried out in October 2014 with a sample size of candidates who had sat the examination between 1st September 2014 and 4th October 2014. After  \ncalibrating the items and equating the forms based on the results of this sample , Scale Score tables were prepared to provide comparable Standard Scores for each candidate.  \nOn completion of the 2014–2015 examination, analysis was carried out on the data from all candidates who had sat the examination during this period. The report that follows gives a detailed analysis of candidate, exa","cbCaidpQbBCZQMWY","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaidpQbBCZQMWY","pdf",806292,"English","# Scope of Work\n# Executive Summary\n# Background\n# Demographics\n# Examination Statistics\n# Scale Scores\n# Impact Analysis\n# Item Statistics\n# Appendix 1 – Demographic Breakdown of Candidate Totals\n# Appendix 2 – Item Analysis by Forms","[{\"question\":\"What period does the LNAT Technical Report cover?\",\"answer\":\"It covers the administration of the LNAT examination from 1st September 2014 to 30th June 2015.\"},{\"question\":\"How were items calibrated and forms equated?\",\"answer\":\"Item calibration and form equating were carried out in October 2014 using a sample of candidates who sat the exam between 1st September 2014 and 4th October 2014.\"},{\"question\":\"What conclusions are drawn about equating and reliability?\",\"answer\":\"The report concludes that equating was successful and that reliability was moderately good, ranging between 0.64 and 0.76.\"}]","LNAT Technical Report September 2014 - June 2015 - Final | PDF",1789739234]