[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-202425-105":59,"doc-detail-202425-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","list-of-proposals-uk-ons-final-submission-v2","List of Proposals - UK ONS FINAL Submission v2","","A submission focused on proposing and refining global monitoring indicators, aligned to major indicator frameworks and the presentation of an indicator list for international use. It addresses the need to verify indicator proposals against existing frameworks, develops guidance for communicating the proposed list, and highlights cross-cutting considerations such as inequality and data disaggregation. Detailed indicator proposals support monitoring of poverty targets, including disaggregation by sex, age, and employment status, and discussions on methodological issues and long-term trends.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/list-of-proposals-uk-ons-final-submission-v2/202425/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/list-of-proposals-uk-ons-final-submission-v2/202425.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Quinn","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-09-04",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"Why should indicators be disaggregated by sex, age, residence, and other characteristics?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The submission emphasizes that indicators should be disaggregated where relevant and possible, including by sex, age, and urban/rural residence, to ensure inequality and special group dimensions are captured.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"What is the approach to verifying proposed indicators against existing frameworks?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The document calls for verifying and matching proposed indicators against existing major indicator frameworks, including those developed at the regional level.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"Which poverty-related indicators are discussed for Goal 1?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"The document includes proposals for indicators under Target 1.1 on extreme poverty and Target 1.2 on national and multidimensional poverty, with attention to disaggregation by sex and age group and methodological considerations.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},202425,1788546666,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":140,"language":141,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":142,"faqs":143,"seo_title":144,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962075114765,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","| List of Proposals\u003Cbr>\u003Cbr>* Note on Disaggregation: All indicators should be disaggregated by sex, age, residence (U/R) and other characteristics, as relevant and possible. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | UNSD seeking views on... |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Verify and match the indicator proposed against existing major indicator frameworks, including those developed at the regional level. | Develop a framework for the presentation and communication of the list of proposed indicators for global monitoring. | Address the issue of data disaggregation, and other cross‐cutting issues such inequality, special groups etc. | Identify inter‐linkages across goals and targets with the purpose of reducing the total number of indicators, using text and scientific analysis. | Provide any additional\u003Cbr>comments/proposals on the indicator\u003Cbr>framework that you believe would be\u003Cbr>useful to the work towards developing an indicator framework. | UK comments on specific indicators |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Goal 1 End poverty in all its forms everywhere |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Target 1.1 By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | Contributor Name | Specification | Source | Entity | Tier | Priority | Interlinkages |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Suggested Indicator |  | Proportion of population below $1.25 (PPP) per day disaggregated by sex and age group and employment status (or Proportion of employed people living on less that $1.25 PPP) a day) | Household surveys (LFS, HIES, LSMS, Integrated HH surveys, etc.) | World Bank and ILO | Tier I |  | 2.3,1.2,8.5 |  |  | Disaggregated by urban/rural, region and social group. The reference to sex and age disaggregation in the specification is misleading undercurrent data household level data collection systems. |  |  | UK supports this indicator |\n| Indicator 1.1.1 Proportion of population below $1.25 (PPP) per day disaggregated by sex and age group ( ABB ) |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | Issues which needed to be addressed were conversion to PPPs, geographical and gender disaggregation. |  |  | The UK agrees this is a useful indicator. |\n|  | IFAD |  |  |  |  | 1 | 2.3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | ILO | Alternative text: [Proportion of population below $1.25 (PPP) per day per capita disaggregated by sex and age group and employment status.] Justification: the disaggregation by status in employment will allow for capturing the working poor which is one of the core MDG indicators | Household surveys (LFS, HIES, LSMS, Integrated HH surveys, etc. ) . | Responsible entities: World Bank and ILO.\u003Cbr>Availability: ILO has estimates available by employment status for 119 countries. |  | 1 | 8.5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | UNICEF | The extreme poverty rate is the proportion of the population living on less than the extreme poverty line (currently at US$1 .25 per day), measured at 2011 international prices, adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP) . This indicator is expressed as a percentage. The underlying disaggregation can calculate the poverty rates for the different population subgroups, specifically the child poverty rate (aged 0‐17) . Other dimensions of disaggregation are location. | World Bank PovCalNet; Micro database (World Bank) | World Bank. Globally available. |  | 1 | 1.2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n|  | WB | Poor populations are defined by comparing household consumption or income aggregates per capita with a new international poverty line after switching the 2005 PPP with the 2011 PPP. We suggest the indicator description be modified to:\u003Cbr>[\"Proportion of population below $1.25 (PPP) per day, with disaggregations of it by sex and age group.\"] In this way, it is clear that we need to monitor the proportion for all people as well. \" | Household Survey | World Bank | ","cbCaiasCYkoOWQNZ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiasCYkoOWQNZ","pdf",1082172,58,"English","# Indicator framework and cross-cutting issues\n## Disaggregation by sex, age, residence and characteristics\n## Inter-linkages across goals and targets\n# Goal 1: End poverty\n## Target 1.1: Extreme poverty eradication\n## Target 1.2: Reduce multidimensional poverty","[{\"question\":\"Why should indicators be disaggregated by sex, age, residence, and other characteristics?\",\"answer\":\"The submission emphasizes that indicators should be disaggregated where relevant and possible, including by sex, age, and urban/rural residence, to ensure inequality and special group dimensions are captured.\"},{\"question\":\"What is the approach to verifying proposed indicators against existing frameworks?\",\"answer\":\"The document calls for verifying and matching proposed indicators against existing major indicator frameworks, including those developed at the regional level.\"},{\"question\":\"Which poverty-related indicators are discussed for Goal 1?\",\"answer\":\"The document includes proposals for indicators under Target 1.1 on extreme poverty and Target 1.2 on national and multidimensional poverty, with attention to disaggregation by sex and age group and methodological considerations.\"}]","List of Proposals - UK ONS FINAL Submission v2 | PDF",146]