[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-427743-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-427743-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","lexico-semantic-and-linguacultural-features-of-the-english-and-uzbek-cooking-utensils","LEXICO-SEMANTIC AND LINGUACULTURAL FEATURES OF THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK COOKING UTENSILS","","Research examines English and Uzbek vocabulary related to cooking utensils, focusing on how lexical units operate across levels within the hyponymic category tied to the thematic group “cooking utensils.” The study analyzes one-word and composite nominations drawn from textual sources and explanatory, cultural, phraseological, and etymological dictionaries. Emphasis is placed on hyperonym–hyponym structures, distribution of lexical paradigms, and the multilevel nature of the semantic field, especially in English comparisons with Uzbek.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/lexico-semantic-and-linguacultural-features-of-the-english-and-uzbek-cooking-utensils/427743/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/lexico-semantic-and-linguacultural-features-of-the-english-and-uzbek-cooking-utensils/427743.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Himbo","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-19","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",10,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What linguistic relationship is central to the study of cooking utensils vocabulary?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The article centers on hierarchical hyperonym–hyponym relationships within the thematic group of “cooking utensils,” where more general terms act as hyperonyms and more specific items act as hyponyms.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How does the article distinguish equonyms within hyponym sets?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It explains that hyponyms sharing the same hyperonym are equal in relation, and are called equonyms when they differ mainly by differential meaning signs while sharing a common semantic component.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What does the article mean by a multilevel hyper-hyponymic series?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It states that a hyperonym can be concretized into immediate hyponyms, and those hyponyms can further become hyperonyms at subsequent stages, creating a multilevel, multi-tiered hyponymic configuration of the semantic field.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},427743,1790672718,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":125},"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":107,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},687197100911,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/a000239b6f1da00475?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1785132997149421697","LEXICO-SEMANTIC AND LINGUACULTURAL FEATURES OF THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK COOKING UTENSILS  \nMamatkulova Fotima Ashirkulovna,  \nSenior Teacher of Uzbekistan State World Languages University  \nAbstract  \nIn this article English and Uzbek vocabulary related to cooking utensils are researched. The functioning of units at various levels that correspond to the English language's hyponymic category—including lexemes connected to the \"cooking utensils\" thematic group—is the focus of our study. One-word and composite nominations that are part of the defined system are the subject of this study. They were taken from text sources and explanatory, cultural, phraseological, and etymological dictionaries using continuous and representative sample collection.  \nKeywords: Linguacultural, feature, cooking utensils, tableware, hyperonym, dictionary, English, Uzbek.  \nIntroduction  \nDifferent kinds of semantic relationships are distinguished within each topic category. The most significant of these is the hierarchical relationship between the name of a larger set of an essential aspect of human life and (more general, generic concept) , the so-called hyperonym, and the name of groups related to it included in this set, i.e., \"names of specific concepts\" -hyponyms. The so-called hyper-hyponymic series is made up of groups of words that are related to one another through subordination connections. A word that is semantically inferior compared to another word is said to be a hyponym, whereas a word that incorporates the semantics of another is said to be a hyperonym. In comparison to a hyponym, a hyperonym is more general in scope and less effective in conveying the concept being established. For instance, in our content, the cooking utensils hyperonym is utilized to refer to items of tableware employed during the eating and cooking process. In relation to it, the members of the spoon, ladle, plate, pot, bowl, knife paradigm are hyponyms. The hyperonym and its immediate hyponyms constitute the hyponymic category.  \nHyponyms of the same hyperonym have common and different features in their meanings. Hyponyms are equal among themselves, their relations are equivalent. Such hyponyms ofthe same hyperonym are called equonyms, and differ in the differential signs highlighted in their meanings in the presence of a common semantic part. So, for example, the hyponyms of the hyperonym knife / knife – pairing knife, bread knife and table knife are equonyms, while differing in their meanings: one is a knife for vegetables, the second is a knife for bread, the other is for the table. In this case, hyponyms are expressed by phrases.  \nComparing to the English cooking utensils it can be concluded that the Uzbek cooking utensils are not too many like English nation’s. For this reason there are not so many hyper-hyponomic raw of vocabulary with Uzbek cooking utensils.  \nThe meaning of a hyperonym as a more generalized meaning specializes in the meanings ofall its hyponyms. One hyperonym has as many hyponyms as the signs of the concept expressed by the hyperonym are specified and fixed in the lexical meanings of different lexemes (or one lexeme). For example, the hyperonym dish has the following hyponyms: appetizer dish / gazakuchun idish, butter dish / saryog' uchun idish, cake dish / pirojni uchun idish, candy dish / konfet uchun idish, cheese dish / pishloq uchun idish, fish dish / baliq uchun idish, ice-ream dish / muzqaymoq uchun idish, jam dish / murabbo uchun idish, pickle dish / tuzlangansabzavotlar uchun idish, vegetable dish / sabzovot uchun idish.  \nThe nominations ofthe thematic group \"cooking utensils\" in English are characterized by the multilevel hyper-hyponymic series. A hyperonym can be concretized not only directly in itshyponyms, but also at subsequent stages, at which its immediate hyponyms already act as hyperonyms, in turn concretized at further stages of the hyper-hyponymic structure [Kharitonchik Z.A., 1992:98] .  \nThus, the hyponymic configurati","cbCaigJMEpFkm4dM","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigJMEpFkm4dM","pdf",312326,"English","# Introduction\n## Hyperonymy and hyponymy in thematic groups\n## Equonyms and differential meaning features\n# Multilevel hyper-hyponymic series\n## Tableware as a hyponymic base\n## Example hyponyms for “dish”\n# Lexical distribution of English cooking utensils","[{\"question\":\"What linguistic relationship is central to the study of cooking utensils vocabulary?\",\"answer\":\"The article centers on hierarchical hyperonym–hyponym relationships within the thematic group of “cooking utensils,” where more general terms act as hyperonyms and more specific items act as hyponyms.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the article distinguish equonyms within hyponym sets?\",\"answer\":\"It explains that hyponyms sharing the same hyperonym are equal in relation, and are called equonyms when they differ mainly by differential meaning signs while sharing a common semantic component.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the article mean by a multilevel hyper-hyponymic series?\",\"answer\":\"It states that a hyperonym can be concretized into immediate hyponyms, and those hyponyms can further become hyperonyms at subsequent stages, creating a multilevel, multi-tiered hyponymic configuration of the semantic field.\"}]","LEXICO-SEMANTIC AND LINGUACULTURAL FEATURES OF THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK COOKING UTENSILS | PDF",1790644725,18]