[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-205902-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-205902-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","lee-supple-file-1-detailed-search-strategy-for-systematic-review","Lee-Supple-File-1 - Detailed Search Strategy for Systematic Review","","Supplementary file 1 provides a detailed, transparent search strategy for a systematic review embedded in a comprehensive scoping study. The results informed the reclassification and analysis of nutrition policy actions using the World Cancer Research Fund’s NOURISHING framework. It describes the development process, searchable question structure based on PICO–T, and approval and documentation steps. It also outlines how searches were run, de-duplicated, screened, and how data were extracted, including PRISMA flow diagram completion.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/lee-supple-file-1-detailed-search-strategy-for-systematic-review/205902/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/lee-supple-file-1-detailed-search-strategy-for-systematic-review/205902.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Evangeline","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-01","2026-09-05",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",9,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What is the purpose of the supplementary document’s search strategy?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It documents the detailed electronic search strategy used for a systematic review within a broader scoping study, supporting reclassification and analysis of nutrition policy actions under the NOURISHING framework.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How are the research questions structured in the search strategy?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Each question is built using the PICO–T concept (Population, Interventions, Comparison, Outcome, and Type of study design) and then restated in plain language to support transparent searching.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Which processes are used after searching to determine included studies?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The team de-duplicates results, screens titles and abstracts, retrieves full texts for potentially relevant records, performs a second screen, and then extracts data into tables and completes PRISMA flow diagrams.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},205902,1788586091,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":55,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":143,"preview_page_count":4},13056703019662,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/be000253a8e92610077?_k=1778726343310543188","Supplementary file 1. Detailed Search Strategy Including Full Electronic Search Strategy for at Least One Database.  \nThis supplementary document details the search strategy for a systematic review conducted as part of a comprehensive scoping study 1, the results of which were used to reclassify and analyse nutrition policy actions against the World Cancer Research Fund’s NOURISHING framework 2.  \nSearch for national food and nutrition policies (in scope countries)  \nSystematic review methods  \nThe project team aimed to use methods which were systematic, transparent and potentially replicable. The process was based upon the principles of robust systematic summary outlined in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews 3 and pragmatically tailored for this project as detailed in thereport of the scoping study 1. Each team member was trained in the process and quality governance measures were implemented.  \nThe overarching process is summarised in Figure 1.  \nFigure 1 Overarching process  \nDevelopment of search strategy  \nThe search strategy was developed by Dr Alison Weightman and Dr Helen Morgan of the Support Unit for Research Evidence (SURE) at Cardiff University, Wales, UK and Professor Philip Baker and Professor Amanda Lee of the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) using standard methods 4,5 .  \nDevelopment of the search strategy involved:  \n• Articulation of searchable question/s and sub-questions, and development of the PICO-T components of each research question (see below) .  \n• Identification and definition of search terms;  \n• Identification of potential databases, websites and receipt of proffered documents by the Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) for consideration for inclusion.  \n• Testing of the search strategy in Medline (Ovid), which was then adapted to other databases.  \n• Approval of the literature search strategy by the DoHA (22 March 2013) .  \nA series of searchable, answerable questions were derived from the main, over-arching research questions before designing the review, as post-hoc questions are more susceptible to bias than those determined a priori 6.  \nEach searchable, answerable question followed the PICO–T concept. The acronym translates to:  \nP – Populations/People/Patients/Problem I – Interventions(s)/Issues  \nC – Comparison O – Outcome and additionally  \nT – Type of study design appropriate for the question  \nAfter developing the PICO – T structure, each question was also restated in ‘plain language’.  \nOther than where identified as being conducted by the QUT team, the SURE team ran the searches, de-duplicated outputs and supplied a full set of results as EndNote libraries or table format as a word document to the QUT team. For each research question the QUT team developed screening tools, quality assessment tools and data extraction tools. These are included in the scoping study report (sections A2.2.5) .  \nFor each research question, the QUT team screened the titles and abstracts of all returns, identified documents of potential relevance, retrieved full versions of these papers and reports and conducted a second screen to identify relevant documents, included these in final Endnote libraries and completed PRISMA flow diagrams.  \nFor each research question data was then extracted from the included documents and entered into data extraction tables.  \nOverview of Research Question  \nPlain language question: Which in scope (OECD) countries have food and nutrition polices? Sub-questions:  \na) What are the scope, issues, recommendations, inclusions and format of these (quality) food and nutrition policies in OECD countries?  \nb) What approaches and information have been used to determine the scope, issues, recommendations, inclusions and format of these food and nutrition policies?  \nDetailed search strategy  \nSearch for: Existence of any OECD countries’(national) food and nutrition policies and component strategies (identifying the most current)  \nStudy type: Food and Nutrition: poli","cbCaisuYegyCZ5fq","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaisuYegyCZ5fq","pdf",509588,"English","# Supplementary file 1 - Detailed Search Strategy\n## Background and review purpose\n## Development of the search strategy\n## Search question structure (PICO–T)\n## Databases and websites searched\n## Study type and search term identification\n## Screening, inclusion, and data extraction","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the supplementary document’s search strategy?\",\"answer\":\"It documents the detailed electronic search strategy used for a systematic review within a broader scoping study, supporting reclassification and analysis of nutrition policy actions under the NOURISHING framework.\"},{\"question\":\"How are the research questions structured in the search strategy?\",\"answer\":\"Each question is built using the PICO–T concept (Population, Interventions, Comparison, Outcome, and Type of study design) and then restated in plain language to support transparent searching.\"},{\"question\":\"Which processes are used after searching to determine included studies?\",\"answer\":\"The team de-duplicates results, screens titles and abstracts, retrieves full texts for potentially relevant records, performs a second screen, and then extracts data into tables and completes PRISMA flow diagrams.\"}]","Lee-Supple-File-1 - Detailed Search Strategy for Systematic Review | PDF",23]