[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-587625-105":59,"doc-detail-587625-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","learning-across-contexts-bringing-together-research-on-research-use-and-implementation-science","Learning Across Contexts - Bringing together research on research use and implementation science","","An essay comparing implementation science and research on research use, explaining how their shared commitment to improving societal outcomes through evidence application intersects with key methodological and assumption differences. It outlines implementation science’s origins and core definition, focusing on barriers and facilitators to evidence-based innovations and the development and testing of implementation strategies. It also frames how cross-field similarities in knowledge generation can enable mutually beneficial learning and support more equitable evidence use.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/learning-across-contexts-bringing-together-research-on-research-use-and-implementation-science/587625/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/learning-across-contexts-bringing-together-research-on-research-use-and-implementation-science/587625.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"นรินทร์","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":29},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Implementation science的核心关注点是什么？","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Implementation science主要关注证据型创新在常规服务中的采纳过程，重点在于获取与应用所面临的障碍与促进因素，而不是先证明创新本身的有效性。","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Implementation science是如何界定研究问题的？",{"text":117,"@type":113},"研究者通常围绕两类探问展开：在多层级情境中识别障碍与促进因素，以及开发并检验能克服障碍、增强促进因素的实施策略。",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"这篇文章如何看待implementation science与研究“research use”的关系？",{"text":121,"@type":113},"文章认为两领域在目标与跨学科团队方面有相似之处，但在方法与经验研究所依据的假设上也出现了关键差异。文章据此提出可以通过跨领域学习获得互补洞见，并推动更强的证据使用支持基础。","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},587625,1792189722,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":29,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},2336475104957,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/22000c4c6bd8a5076e1?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1787554080175789136","Learning Across Contexts: Bringing Together Research on Research Use and Implementation Science  \nLauren Supplee*  \nU.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families Annette Boaz  \nLondon School ofHygeine and Tropical Medicine Allison Metz  \nSchool ofSocial Work, University ofNorth Carolina at Chapel Hill  \nLearning Across Contexts: Bringing Together Research on Research Use and Implementation Science  \nLauren Supplee*  \nU.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families  \nAnnette Boaz  \nLondon School ofHygeine and Tropical Medicine Allison Metz  \nSchool ofSocial Work, University ofNorth Carolina at Chapel Hill  \n* The manuscript was co-authored by Dr. Suppleein her private capacity. No official support or endorsement of the content by the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, or the United States is intended or should be inferred.  \nSuggested Citation:  \nSupplee, L., Boaz, A., & Metz, A. (2023) . Learning across contexts: Bringing together research on research use and implementation science. William T. Grant Foundation.  \nRECENT PUBLICATIONS BY IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCHERS underscore promising new directions in implementation science while also acknowledging potential challenges for the field to address in the years ahead (Beidas et al., 2022; Metz et al., 2022) . Atthe same time, scholars in the field of research on research use are forging new directions of their own by drawing on a wider range of bodies of knowledge to investigate strategies for improving and assessing research use.  \nThe fields of implementation science and the study of research use in policy and practice travel on many of the same roads and share similar goals, chief among which is improving societal outcomes through the application of research. Both fields also attract interdisciplinary teams and create strikingly similar knowledge across contexts. However, key differences have emerged in these two fields of study and the assumptions they make in the empirical work. These differences provide opportunities to strengthen the next generation of both implementation science and research on research use.  \nIn this essay, we highlight how similarities and differences in the methods, approaches, and evolution of each of these fields can contribute to mutually beneficial insights and potential alignments. We describe each field in detail, with an eye toward highlighting key assumptions and differences, and we conclude by discussing opportunities for learning across fields. Overall, we aim to inspire a dialogue that may build a stronger foundation for supporting evidence use in ways that achieve equitable outcomes for people and communities.  \nImplementation science  \nWhile there have been various approaches to supporting wide-scale use of evidencebased innovations to improve outcomes for people and communities over the last several decades (e.g., diffusion of innovation theory in the 1960s), implementation science entered the scientific and academic discourse with the launch of the foundational journal Implementation Science in 2006. Implementation research, as defined in the inaugural issue of the journal, is “[The] scientific study ofmethods to promote the systematic uptake of research findings and other evidence-based practices into routine practice, and, hence, to improve the quality and effectiveness of health services.” This definition, still the most widely accepted in the field, includes the study of influences on service professionals and organizational behavior (Eccles & Mitman, 2006) .  \nImplementation science is concerned primarily with the barriers and facilitatorsto the uptake of evidence-based innovations, rather than the efficacy of innovations themselves (Bauer & Kirchner, 2020). Atthe heart of implementation science is the assumption that establishing the effectiveness of an innovation does not guarantee its effective use in routine","cbCaigaMNqeEluDl","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigaMNqeEluDl","pdf",2388069,22,"English","# Implementation science\n## Evolution of the discipline","[{\"question\":\"Implementation science的核心关注点是什么？\",\"answer\":\"Implementation science主要关注证据型创新在常规服务中的采纳过程，重点在于获取与应用所面临的障碍与促进因素，而不是先证明创新本身的有效性。\"},{\"question\":\"Implementation science是如何界定研究问题的？\",\"answer\":\"研究者通常围绕两类探问展开：在多层级情境中识别障碍与促进因素，以及开发并检验能克服障碍、增强促进因素的实施策略。\"},{\"question\":\"这篇文章如何看待implementation science与研究“research use”的关系？\",\"answer\":\"文章认为两领域在目标与跨学科团队方面有相似之处，但在方法与经验研究所依据的假设上也出现了关键差异。文章据此提出可以通过跨领域学习获得互补洞见，并推动更强的证据使用支持基础。\"}]","Learning Across Contexts - Bringing together research on research use and implementation science | PDF",1792062436,55]