[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-415553-105":59,"doc-detail-415553-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","language-outcomes-of-children-who-are-deaf-or-hard-of-hearing-insights-from-lsl-dr","Language Outcomes of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing - Insights from LSL-DR","","e-poster analyzing language development trajectories for children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) who participated in OPTION programs between ages 3 and 6. Early diagnosis, access to sound technology, and intervention are emphasized. Annual U.S. assessments are entered into the Listening and Spoken Language Data Repository (LSL-DR), including standardized vocabulary measures (PPVT/EVT or ROWPVT/EOWPVT) and language tests (CELF-P, OWLS). Results evaluate receptive, expressive, and connected language, and consider coded factors such as hearing technology and home language.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/language-outcomes-of-children-who-are-deaf-or-hard-of-hearing-insights-from-lsl-dr/415553/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/language-outcomes-of-children-who-are-deaf-or-hard-of-hearing-insights-from-lsl-dr/415553.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"sagouaw","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-28",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",12,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the main focus of the e-poster?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"The e-poster characterizes language development trajectories of children who are DHH who attended OPTION programs from ages 3 to 6, using data from LSL-DR.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Which assessment tools are used for vocabulary and language outcomes?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"Vocabulary outcomes use PPVT-4/EVT-2 or ROWPVT/EOWPVT, and language outcomes use CELF-P or OWLS (with CELF-P, OWLS also analyzed across ages).",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What kinds of factors are coded and planned for future discussion?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"Factors include hearing technology, age at intervention in the OPTION program, language spoken at home, prematurity, and presence of additional disabilities.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},415553,1790665716,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":39,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":46,"preview_page_count":4},3985747862151,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Language Outcomes of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing  \nInsights from LSL-DR  \nUma Soman, Ronda Rufsvold, Betsy Brooks, Meredith Berger, & Tamala Bradham Carle Auditory Oral School, Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech, Moog Center for Deaf Education, CCHAT Sacramento,  \nVanderbilt University Medical Center, and OPTION Schools  \nINTRODUCTION  \n❑ Children who are deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) can develop listening and spoken language when they receive early diagnosis, early access to sound through hearing technology, and early intervention.  \n❑ OPTION programs are a consortium of schools and intervention programs that provide listening and spoken language (LSL) intervention to infants, toddlers and children who are DHH.  \n❑ OPTION programs in the US, administer annual assessments and enter outcomes data into Listening and Spoken Language Data Repository (LSL-DR) .  \n❑ Vocabulary – Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4) & Expressive Vocabulary Test (EVT-2) OR Receptive/Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test (ROWPVT & EOWPVT)  \n❑ Language – Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Primary (CELF-P) OR Oral Written Language Scales (OWLS) OR Preschool Language Scale (PLS)  \nAll authors are salaried employees of their organizations. A portion of Rufsvold (project manager) and Bradham (PI)’s salary is paid by  \nOPTION Schools. Soman received a travel grant from OPTION Schools to attend thisASHA convention.  \nLanguage Outcomes of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing  \nInsights from LSL-DR  \nUma Soman, Ronda Rufsvold, Betsy Brooks, Meredith Berger, & Tamala Bradham Carle Auditory Oral School, Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech, Moog Center for Deaf Education, CCHAT Sacramento,  \nVanderbilt University Medical Center, and OPTION Schools  \nOBJECTIVE & METHODS  \n❑ This e-poster characterizes language development trajectories of children who are DHH and have attended OPTION programs between the ages of 3-6 years.  \n❑ Outcomes for children who met the following criteria were analyzed  \n❑ Three data points for standardized vocabulary assessments (PPVT & EVT or ROWPVT & EOWPVT) at age three, four, and five  \n❑ Three out of four data points for standardized language assessments (CELF and OWLS) at age three, four, five, and six  \n❑ Various factors including hearing technology, age at intervention in OPTION program, language spoken in the home, prematurity, presence of additional disabilities were coded and will be discussed in future publications.  \n❑ Outcomes of children who were reported as having a mild, moderate, or severe impact on learning were analyzed as a part of the sample, but also separately.  \nLanguage Outcomes of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing  \nInsights from LSL-DR  \nUma Soman, Ronda Rufsvold, Betsy Brooks, Meredith Berger, & Tamala Bradham Carle Auditory Oral School, Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech, Moog Center for Deaf Education, CCHAT Sacramento,  \nVanderbilt University Medical Center, and OPTION Schools  \nPARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS  \n300  \n250  \n200  \n150  \n100  \n50  \n0  \n19%  \nDHH+  \n\n|  |  |  | \u003Cbr>20%\u003Cbr>DHH+\u003Cbr>| \u003Cbr>17%\u003Cbr>DHH+\u003Cbr>| \u003Cbr>30%\u003Cbr>DHH+\u003Cbr>|\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |\n\nPPVT / EVT ROWPVT / EOWPVT  \nCELF-P OWLS  \nGender  \n Unknown  \n Female  \n Male  \nPPVT = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, EVT = Expressive Vocabulary Test  \nEROWPVT = Expressive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test, ROWPVT = Receptive One Word Picture Vocabulary Test CELF –P = Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Preschool, OWLS = Oral Written Language Scales  \n100%  \n90%  \n80%  \n70%  \n60%  \n50%  \n40%  \n30%  \n20%  \n10%  \n0%  \n100%  \n80%  \n60%  \n40%  \n20%  \n0%  \nHearing Technology  \n BAHD/ Softband  \n Bimodal  \n Hearing Aids  \n Cochlear Implants  \nPPVT / EVT ROWPVT / EOWPVT  \nCELF-P OWLS  \nLanguage Outcomes of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing  \nInsights from LSL-DR  \nUma Soman, Ronda Rufsvold, Betsy Brooks, Meredith Berger, & Tamala Bradham Carle Auditory Oral ","cbCaie0nOMNKgslc","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaie0nOMNKgslc","pdf",510190,"English","# Introduction\n## Objective & Methods\n## Participant Characteristics\n## Results – Receptive Vocabulary\n## Results – Expressive Vocabulary\n## Results – Connected Language","[{\"question\":\"What is the main focus of the e-poster?\",\"answer\":\"The e-poster characterizes language development trajectories of children who are DHH who attended OPTION programs from ages 3 to 6, using data from LSL-DR.\"},{\"question\":\"Which assessment tools are used for vocabulary and language outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"Vocabulary outcomes use PPVT-4/EVT-2 or ROWPVT/EOWPVT, and language outcomes use CELF-P or OWLS (with CELF-P, OWLS also analyzed across ages).\"},{\"question\":\"What kinds of factors are coded and planned for future discussion?\",\"answer\":\"Factors include hearing technology, age at intervention in the OPTION program, language spoken at home, prematurity, and presence of additional disabilities.\"}]","Language Outcomes of Children Who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing - Insights from LSL-DR | PDF",1790601848]