[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-503973-105":59,"doc-detail-503973-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","lake-region-informativeexplanatory-writing-rubric-based-on-the-work-of-sbac-scoring-criteria","Lake Region Informative/Explanatory Writing Rubric - Based on the work of SBAC - Scoring Criteria","","Lake Region Informative/Explanatory Writing Rubric (Based on the work of SBAC) provides performance-level criteria for evaluating student responses in informative/explanatory writing. It defines score categories from 4 to 1 across key dimensions: Statement of Purpose/Focus, Organization, Elaboration of Evidence, Language and Vocabulary, and Conventions. The rubric specifies what strong responses do, including clear control of the main idea, effective transitions and structure, relevant cited evidence and depth, precise academic language, and accurate usage, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/lake-region-informativeexplanatory-writing-rubric-based-on-the-work-of-sbac-scoring-criteria/503973/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/lake-region-informativeexplanatory-writing-rubric-based-on-the-work-of-sbac-scoring-criteria/503973.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Well Done","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-10","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does the rubric assess in informative/explanatory writing?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It evaluates Statement of Purpose/Focus, Organization, Elaboration of Evidence, Language and Vocabulary, and Conventions across four performance levels (4 to 1).","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How is a score of 4 described for Statement of Purpose/Focus?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"A score of 4 requires a fully sustained and consistently purposeful focus, with a clearly stated controlling or main idea strongly maintained and communicated within context.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What distinguishes a score of 1 for Organization?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"A score of 1 indicates little or no discernible organizational structure, with few or no transitions, and frequent extraneous ideas intruding.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},503973,1791593208,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":81,"preview_page_count":4},5909892210082,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/56001069da27c9f41e8?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1789614185077863061","Lake Region Informative/Explanatory Writing Rubric (Based on the work of SBAC)  \n\n| Score | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Statement of Purpose/\u003Cbr>Focus | response is fully sustained and consistently and purposefully focused:\u003Cbr>• controlling or main idea is focused, clearly stated, and strongly maintained\u003Cbr>• controlling or main idea is introduced and communicated clearly within the context | response is adequately sustained and generally focused:\u003Cbr>• focus is clear and maintained, though some loosely related material may be present\u003Cbr>• some context for the controlling or main idea is communicated | response is somewhat sustained and may have a minor drift in focus:\u003Cbr>• may be clearly focused on the controlling or main idea, but is insufficiently sustained\u003Cbr>• controlling or main idea may be unclear and somewhat unfocused | response may be related to the topic but may provide little or no focus:\u003Cbr>• may be very brief\u003Cbr>• may have a major drift\u003Cbr>• focus may be confusing or ambiguous |\n| Organization | clear and effective organizational structure creating unity and completeness:\u003Cbr>• effective, consistent use of a variety of transitional strategies\u003Cbr>• logical progression of ideas beginning to end\u003Cbr>• effective introduction and conclusion for audience and purpose\u003Cbr>• strong connections among ideas | evident organizational structure and a sense of completeness, may be minor flaws and some ideas may be loosely connected:\u003Cbr>• adequate use of varied transitional strategies\u003Cbr>• adequate progression of ideas\u003Cbr>• adequate introduction and conclusion\u003Cbr>• adequate, if slightly inconsistent, connection among ideas | inconsistent organizational structure, flaws are evident:\u003Cbr>• inconsistent use of basic transitional strategies with little variety\u003Cbr>• uneven progression of ideas\u003Cbr>• weak conclusion and introduction\u003Cbr>• weak connection among ideas | little or no discernible organizational structure:\u003Cbr>• few or no transitional strategies are evident\u003Cbr>• frequent extraneous ideas may intrude |\n| Elaboration of Evidence | response provides thorough & convincing support for the controlling or main idea that includes the effective use of sources, facts, and details. The response achieves substantial depth that is specific and relevant:\u003Cbr>• use of evidence from sources is smoothly integrated, comprehensive, relevant, concrete and carefully cited\u003Cbr>• effective use of varied elaborative techniques | response provides adequate support for the controlling or main idea that includes the use of sources, facts, and details:\u003Cbr>• evidence from sources is integrated, though citations may be general or imprecise\u003Cbr>• adequate use of elaborative techniques | response provides uneven, cursory support for the controlling or main idea that includes partial or uneven use of sources, facts, and details:\u003Cbr>• evidence from sources is weakly integrated, and citations are uneven\u003Cbr>• weak or uneven use of elaborative techniques | response provides minimal support for the controlling or main idea that includes little or no use of sources, facts, and details:\u003Cbr>• use of evidence from sources is minimal, absent, in error, or irrelevant |\n| Language\u003Cbr>and\u003Cbr>Vocabulary | response clearly and effectively expresses ideas, using precise language:\u003Cbr>• use of academic and domain-specific vocabulary is clearly appropriate for the audience and purpose | response adequately expresses ideas, employing a mix of precise with more general language\u003Cbr>• use of domain-specific vocabulary is generally appropriate for the audience and purpose | response expresses ideas unevenly, using simplistic language:\u003Cbr>• use of domain-specific vocabulary may at times be inappropriate for the audience and purpose | expression of ideas is vague, lacks clarity, or is confusing:\u003Cbr>• uses limited language or domainspecific vocabulary\u003Cbr>• may have little sense of audience and purpose |\n| Conventions | response demonstrates strong command of conventions:","cbCaitXhZzuflXrz","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitXhZzuflXrz","pdf",71237,"English","# Statement of Purpose/Focus\n# Organization\n# Elaboration of Evidence\n# Language and Vocabulary\n# Conventions","[{\"question\":\"What does the rubric assess in informative/explanatory writing?\",\"answer\":\"It evaluates Statement of Purpose/Focus, Organization, Elaboration of Evidence, Language and Vocabulary, and Conventions across four performance levels (4 to 1).\"},{\"question\":\"How is a score of 4 described for Statement of Purpose/Focus?\",\"answer\":\"A score of 4 requires a fully sustained and consistently purposeful focus, with a clearly stated controlling or main idea strongly maintained and communicated within context.\"},{\"question\":\"What distinguishes a score of 1 for Organization?\",\"answer\":\"A score of 1 indicates little or no discernible organizational structure, with few or no transitions, and frequent extraneous ideas intruding.\"}]","Lake Region Informative/Explanatory Writing Rubric - Based on the work of SBAC - Scoring Criteria | PDF",1791062213]