[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33421-en":3,"doc-seo-33421-105":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},33421,8796095462418,"Noah","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/80000253c1241d02b47?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778826106357471780",8,"Research & Report","Koji Mizoguchi A Future of Archaeology","Koji Mizoguchi outlines how archaeology is being reshaped under intensifying globalisation. The article argues that globalisation can homogenise theoretical and methodological practices while also accelerating fragmentation through new mini-paradigms and widening divides between theory- and method-producers and consumers. It connects these dynamics to unequal access to capital, pressures on self-identity, and rising social tensions, proposing inclusivity and dialogue as strategic priorities. Concrete strategies are developed to broaden archaeological imagination and better address globalisation’s negative effects.","","cbCaiqUNQVcaWOnE","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiqUNQVcaWOnE","pdf",241987,1,11,"English","en",105,"# Archaeological Futures\n## Archaeology and the world now\n## Globalisation and its consequences\n## Building strategies for inclusivity","[{\"question\":\"How does globalisation affect archaeology according to Mizoguchi?\",\"answer\":\"Globalisation homogenises archaeological theoretical and methodological packages while also accelerating fragmentation by generating mini-paradigms and deepening divides between those who produce and those who consume theory and methodology.\"},{\"question\":\"What social factors does the article link to archaeological fragmentation and practice?\",\"answer\":\"Unequal access to capital and sources of wealth, along with socio-cultural and political conditions that disturb self-identity, correlate with different trajectories of countries and different ways of doing archaeology.\"},{\"question\":\"What strategic priorities does the article propose for the future of archaeology?\",\"answer\":\"It calls for promoting inclusivity and dialogue at all levels and scales within and between archaeological communities, alongside broadening archaeological imaginations to envision better futures.\"}]",1782209317,28,{"code":4,"msg":30,"data":31},"ok",{"site_id":24,"language":23,"slug":32,"title":13,"keywords":15,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":84,"head_meta":86,"extra_data":88,"updated_unix":27},"koji-mizoguchi-a-future-of-archaeology",{"@graph":34,"@context":83},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":20},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/koji-mizoguchi-a-future-of-archaeology/33421/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"How does globalisation affect archaeology according to Mizoguchi?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"Globalisation homogenises archaeological theoretical and methodological packages while also accelerating fragmentation by generating mini-paradigms and deepening divides between those who produce and those who consume theory and methodology.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"What social factors does the article link to archaeological fragmentation and practice?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"Unequal access to capital and sources of wealth, along with socio-cultural and political conditions that disturb self-identity, correlate with different trajectories of countries and different ways of doing archaeology.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What strategic priorities does the article propose for the future of archaeology?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"It calls for promoting inclusivity and dialogue at all levels and scales within and between archaeological communities, alongside broadening archaeological imaginations to envision better futures.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":85,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":87,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":24}]