[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-502937-105":59,"doc-detail-502937-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","kentucky-ambient-air-monitoring-five-year-network-assessment","Kentucky Ambient Air Monitoring Five-Year Network Assessment","","Five-year ambient air monitoring network assessment for Kentucky, submitted by the Kentucky Division for Air Quality for EPA review under 40 CFR § 58.10(d). The executive summary evaluates ozone, PM2.5, lead, PM10, and siting criteria, noting where monitoring networks meet minimum requirements and where deficiencies or metadata issues require updates. Key actions include designating maximum concentration sites in AQS, adjusting ozone monitoring scales, correcting PM2.5 collocation limitations in the 2016 plan, and recommending lead monitoring near maximum impact zones.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/kentucky-ambient-air-monitoring-five-year-network-assessment/502937/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/kentucky-ambient-air-monitoring-five-year-network-assessment/502937.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aria Callaghan","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-03",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of the five-year network assessment for Kentucky?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It is submitted for EPA review in accordance with 40 CFR § 58.10(d) and summarizes major findings from the annual monitoring network plan and periodic network assessment.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What ozone-related updates are planned for the AQS maximum concentration site designations?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The assessment indicates intent to designate specific monitors as maximum concentration sites in several MSAs and to notify relevant agencies when changes affect multiple jurisdictions.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Why does Kentucky need to correct a PM2.5 collocation deficiency in the 2016 Network Plan?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The document states Kentucky did not meet the 80% requirement for collocated monitors being within 20% of the NAAQS annual averages or daily concentrations, and plans corrective action in the 2016 plan.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},502937,1791121824,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},962084926284,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","2015  \nKentucky Ambient Air Monitoring Five-Year Network Assessment  \nCommonwealth of Kentucky  \nEnergy & Environment Cabinet  \nDepartment for Environmental Protection  \nDivision for Air Quality  \n200 Fair Oaks Lane, 1st Floor  \nFrankfort, Kentucky 40601  \nThis is a publication of the Kentucky Division for Air Quality, part of the Department for Environmental Protection, Energy and Environment Cabinet. The Cabinet does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability and provides, on request, reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs, and activities.  \nExecutive Summary  \nIn accordance with 40 CFR § 58.10(d), Annual monitoring network plan and periodic network assessment, KDAQ respectfully submits this network assessment for EPA review. The major findings of the assessment are summarized below:  \n􀁸  Ozone:  \n􀁸The ozone monitoring network meets or exceeds the minimum number of monitors required in each MSA. However, three MSAs have never had a maximum concentration site formally established. As such KDAQ intends to make the following modifications to monitor metadata in AQS, as well as in the Annual Network Plan:  \n􀁸Elizabethtown-Ft Knox, KY MSA: KDAQ will designate the Elizabethtown monitor (21-093- 0006) as the maximum concentration site in AQS, as it is the only site in the MSA.  \n􀁸Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH MSA: KDAQ will designate the FIVCO monitor (21-019- 0017) as the maximum concentration site, as it is the highest reading monitor in the MSA; however, KDAQ will notify agencies in Ohio and West Virginia prior to making any changes in AQS.  \n􀁸Bowling Green, KY MSA: KDAQ recommends that the CASTNET ozone monitor located atthe Mammoth Cave site (21-061-0501) be the designated maximum concentration site, if this is agreeable to the National Park Service and the EPA  \n􀁸The evaluation of spatial scales of representativeness indicates that two ozone monitors likely have monitoring scales that differ from the metadata established in AQS. As such KDAQ intends to make the following changes:  \n􀁸Middlesboro (21-013-0002): The monitoring scale will be changed from regional to neighborhood.  \n􀁸Grayson Lake (21-043-0500): The monitoring scale will be changed from urban to regional  \n􀁸  PM2.5:  \n􀁸The PM2.5 monitoring network in Kentucky meets or exceeds the minimum number of stations required by 40 CFR 58, Appendix D. However, KDAQ did not meet the requirement to have 80% of the collocated monitors located at sites with annual averages or daily concentrations estimated tobe within 20% of the NAAQS.  \n􀁸Based upon the annual average at each site, KDAQ has only one collocated sampler (21-093-0006) located at a site within 20% NAAQS. KDAQ would need to have all two collocated samplers located at sites with annual averages within 20% of the NAAQS to meet the requirement. KDAQ will correct this deficiency in the 2016 Network Plan.  \n􀁸  Lead:  \n􀁸Due to a predicted maximum 3-month rolling average above one-half the lead NAAQS at the AK Steel facility in Boyd County, the Division recommends lead monitoring in the proximity of maximum ambient air impact. The full results of the modeling demonstration, as well as the lead monitoring waiver request is located in Appendix B of this assessment.  \n􀁸  PM 10:  \n􀁸KDAQ collects 24-hour PM 10 samples that run between midnight-midnight local time, in observance of Daylight Savings. There is a contradiction in the CFR regarding the use of local time versus local standard time. 40 CFR 50, Appendix K defines a “Daily Value for PM 10” as “the 24-hour average concentration of PM 10 calculated or measured from midnight to midnight (local time) .” Meanwhile, 40 CFR 58.12 states that “a 24-hour sample must be taken from midnight to midnight (local standard time) in order to ensure national consistency.” KDAQ is considering changing ","cbCairXgWPyBC9He","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairXgWPyBC9He","pdf",29788407,247,"English","# Introduction\n# Ozone Monitoring Network\n# PM2.5 Monitoring Network\n# Lead Monitoring Network\n# NO2 Monitoring Network\n# PM 10 Monitoring Network\n# SO2 Monitoring Network\n# Sensitive Populations\n## Appendix A: Renewal of Waivers from the Requirements of 40 CFR 58\n## Appendix B: Renewal of Waiver from the Requirements of 40 CFR 58","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the five-year network assessment for Kentucky?\",\"answer\":\"It is submitted for EPA review in accordance with 40 CFR § 58.10(d) and summarizes major findings from the annual monitoring network plan and periodic network assessment.\"},{\"question\":\"What ozone-related updates are planned for the AQS maximum concentration site designations?\",\"answer\":\"The assessment indicates intent to designate specific monitors as maximum concentration sites in several MSAs and to notify relevant agencies when changes affect multiple jurisdictions.\"},{\"question\":\"Why does Kentucky need to correct a PM2.5 collocation deficiency in the 2016 Network Plan?\",\"answer\":\"The document states Kentucky did not meet the 80% requirement for collocated monitors being within 20% of the NAAQS annual averages or daily concentrations, and plans corrective action in the 2016 plan.\"}]","Kentucky Ambient Air Monitoring Five-Year Network Assessment | PDF",1791046480,622]