[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-661049-105":59,"doc-detail-661049-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","kashf-journal-of-multidisciplinary-research-vol-1-issue-3-the-double-helix-article-review","Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research - Vol 1 - Issue 3 - THE DOUBLE HELIX article review","","“The Double Helix” by James D. Watson recounts the 1953 race to determine DNA’s double-stranded structure, combining personal testimony with scientific reasoning. The analysis in this article connects Watson and Francis Crick’s Cambridge work to the X-ray diffraction evidence of Rosalind Franklin and the controversial sharing of data by Maurice Wilkins. It examines the scientific framework of hydrogen bonding and base pairing, and highlights historical, cultural, and ethical debates about credit, collaboration, and the marginalization of women in science, while assessing the memoir’s lasting impact.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/kashf-journal-of-multidisciplinary-research-vol-1-issue-3-the-double-helix-article-review/661049/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/kashf-journal-of-multidisciplinary-research-vol-1-issue-3-the-double-helix-article-review/661049.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Quinn Holloway","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-28",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What does the article explain about the DNA discovery portrayed in “The Double Helix”?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"It describes the race in early 1950s molecular biology that led to determining DNA’s double-helix structure and explains how that breakthrough is linked to modern genetics.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"How does the article connect the Watson-Crick model to scientific evidence?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"It links Watson and Crick’s physical model building and chemical reasoning, including hydrogen bonding and base pairing, to Rosalind Franklin’s X-ray diffraction data.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"What ethical issues does the article highlight regarding credit and collaboration?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"It focuses on the controversial use of Franklin’s data without consent, discusses sexism and the downplaying of her role, and raises questions about how credit is attributed in scientific research.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},661049,1793156742,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":24,"language":138,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":139,"faqs":140,"seo_title":141,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":142},2336474466712,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","| | Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research\u003Cbr>Vol:01 Issue03 (2024)\u003Cbr>P-ISSN: 3007-1992 E-ISSN: 3007-200X\u003Cbr>[https://kjmr.com.pk](https://kjmr.com.pk) |\n| --- | --- |\n\n\"THE DOUBLE HELIX\"  \nBilal Tanweer  \nLahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS)  \nTariq Rahman  \nLahore School of Economics  \n\n| Article Info | Abstract |\n| --- | --- |\n| Received: 01st March, 2024\u003Cbr>Review 1: 05th March, 2024\u003Cbr>Review 2: 10th March, 2024\u003Cbr>Published: 20th March, 2024 | \"The Double Helix\" is a landmark work written by James D. Watson that chronicles the discovery of the DNA structure, arguably the most important scientific revelation of the 20th century. In a narrative that blends personal anecdotes with rigorous scientific exploration, Watson provides an intimate look into the competitive and often contentious race to solve the mystery of DNA’s double-stranded structure. The book offers |\n| | insight into the collaboration between Watson and Francis Crick, alongside Rosalind Franklin's pivotal but underappreciated contributions. This article dissects the text's historical, scientific, and cultural implications, exploring how\"The Double Helix\" not only changed molecular biology but also opened debates about ethics, credit in scientific research, and the nature of discovery. |\n| \u003Cbr>This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license [https://creativecommons.org/l](https://creativecommons.org/l)icenses/by/4 .0 | Keywords: DNA structure, James D. Watson, Francis Crick, Rosalind Franklin, X-ray diffraction, molecular biology, scientific discovery, ethics in science, race for discovery, nucleic acids, hydrogen bonding, Watson-Crick model, Maurice Wilkins, biological revolution, genetics. |\n\nIntroduction  \nFew books in the history of science have stirred as much controversy and admiration as The Double Helix by James D. Watson. Published in 1968, this memoir recounts the discovery of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), the molecule that carries genetic information in living organisms. While the subject matter itself is a towering scientific achievement, the manner in which Watson presents it—blending technical insights with a candid personal narrative—revolutionized how scientific tales are told. The discovery of the double-helix structure by Watson and Crick in 1953, based on the X-ray diffraction work of Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins, has come to symbolize the birth of modern genetics.  \nWatson’s book not only details the race for discovery, but also pulls back the curtain on the human side of science: the rivalries, ambitions, and the ethical questions that accompany such monumental discoveries. This article explores The Double Helix from multiple angles, examining its scientific details, historical context, and the ethical discussions it prompted. We will also analyze how this memoir shaped public perceptions of science and scientists and its lasting impact on molecular biology.  \nThe DNA Race in Context:  \nThe early 1950s marked a period of intense competition in molecular biology, as various researchers raced to unravel the mystery of DNA. At the time, scientists already knew that DNA carried genetic information, but its threedimensional structure remained elusive. Watson and Crick, both working at Cambridge’s Cavendish Laboratory, hypothesized that understanding this structure was key to unlocking the secret of genetic replication and heredity.  \nTheir work was heavily influenced by the experimental data of Rosalind Franklin, a crystallographer at King's College, whose X-ray  \ndiffraction images provided crucial evidence for the double-helix model. Maurice Wilkins, Franklin’s colleague, shared some of this data with Watson and Crick without her knowledge, a controversial act that plays a central role in the ethical debates surrounding the discovery.  \nScientific Framework:  \nWatson and Crick’s ultimate breakthrough involved buildi","cbCaid8XS1IEkese","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaid8XS1IEkese","pdf",495193,"English","# Introduction\n# The DNA Race in Context\n# Scientific Framework\n# Ethics and Gender in Science\n# Graph 1: Key Events Timeline Leading to the Discovery of the DNA Structure","[{\"question\":\"What does the article explain about the DNA discovery portrayed in “The Double Helix”?\",\"answer\":\"It describes the race in early 1950s molecular biology that led to determining DNA’s double-helix structure and explains how that breakthrough is linked to modern genetics.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the article connect the Watson-Crick model to scientific evidence?\",\"answer\":\"It links Watson and Crick’s physical model building and chemical reasoning, including hydrogen bonding and base pairing, to Rosalind Franklin’s X-ray diffraction data.\"},{\"question\":\"What ethical issues does the article highlight regarding credit and collaboration?\",\"answer\":\"It focuses on the controversial use of Franklin’s data without consent, discusses sexism and the downplaying of her role, and raises questions about how credit is attributed in scientific research.\"}]","Kashf Journal of Multidisciplinary Research - Vol 1 - Issue 3 - THE DOUBLE HELIX article review | PDF",13]