[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-444934-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-444934-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","justice-volume-9-no-1-september-1981","JUSTICE - Volume 9, No. 1 - September 1981","","Issue “JUSTICE” (American Bar Association, Section of Criminal Justice, Volume 9, No. 1, September 1981) reports on ABA leadership and Section actions concerning crime policy. It describes Edwin Meese’s remarks on a CJS task force draft and outlines the Section’s opposition to Reagan-era legislation to modify the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule. It also summarizes proposed “Phase II” changes to federal criminal procedure, emphasizing coordination, statutory and funding adjustments, and specific recommendations on narcotics, firearms, habeas corpus, victims, and tax cases.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/","Healthcare",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/justice-volume-9-no-1-september-1981/444934/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/justice-volume-9-no-1-september-1981/444934.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"OmBimo","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What legislative change does the ABA Criminal Justice Section oppose in this issue?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"The ABA strongly opposes efforts to abolish or modify the exclusionary rule, describing planned legislation to modify the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule as constitutionally questionable and harmful in practice.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"What does the “Phase II” report emphasize regarding federal action against violent crime?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"It emphasizes the federal government getting its own house in order, improving coordination among federal, state, and local efforts, and shifting impact through changes to federal statutes, funding levels, and resource allocation.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"Which areas of recommendations are highlighted in the report summary?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"The issue highlights recommendations on narcotics (foreign and border policies), firearms (including importation bans and background-check waiting periods), habeas corpus limits, victims’ fair treatment, and certain tax enforcement approaches.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},444934,1790812285,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,109,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":55,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":115,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},962090893581,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","# JUSTICE\n\nAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION·SECTION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE·VOLUME 9.NO.1·SEPTEMBER 1981  \nFrom lett cis chairperson Juoge sylvia Bacon.PresidentialCounselor Edwin Meese.IⅢ;CJS Crime Task Force ChairpersonRichard E.Gerstein;and CJS Director Laurie O.Robinson  \nSpeaking at a luncheon organized by the Criminal JusticeSection at the ABA's Annual Meeting in New OrleansEdwinMeese,Illtold a capacity audience that he was tremendouslyimpressed by the advance draft report of the CJS Task Forceon Crime.  \nFollowing a speech in which he called crime \"the numberone social problem.\"Meese left Criminal Justice Sectionmembers with this charge:  \n\"I think we have to work together to enlist the entire bar,andthrough the entire bar,a much greater degree of public supportfor the kinds of common sense solutions that your task force isworking with /would hope that this Section can go forwardin the next year making the entire legal profession an agent forimproving the criminal justice system.\"  \nBulletin  \nA major plank in the Reagan Administration'scrime program this fallwill be legislation to modifythe Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule.Based on astrong American Bar Association policy favoringretention of the rule,the Section will be ieading amajor push in the coming months to resist enactmentof such legislation.  \nCJS encourages its members to contact theirCongressional delegations to urge that thislegislation be killed.The ABA's opposition is based onseveral factors—the questionable constitutionality ofsuch legislation,the empirical evidence indicatingthat the rule does not result in the freeing of hordesof criminais,and the enormous amount of litigationsuch legislation would stir up for years to come,clogging an already overburdened system.  \n# Dramatic Changes in CriminalProcedure Proposed by A.G.'sTask Force\n\nThe fina \"Phase Il'report of the Attorney General'sTask Force on Violent Crime places a top priority on thefederal government getting its own house in order for aneffective fight against crime,and an improvedcoordination of federal,state and local efforts in this area.  \nWhereas the \"Phase I\"report issued on June 17contained recommendations that the Department ofJustice could undertake within its existing statutoryframework and resources,the final report unveiled onAugust 17 focuses on changes in federal statutes,funding levels and allocation of resources designed toincrease the federal government's impact on violent andserious crime,while at the same time decreasingitsinvolvement in state and local criminal justice matters.  \nThis decreased presence is most forcefully articulatedby language contained in the transmittal letteraccompanying the final report,which states,\"We do notbelieve that the federal government should subsidize theongoing operations of state and local criminal justicesystems.\"The report notes that“(T)he federalgovernment's first priority should be to provide adequateresources to its own offices \"It suggests that federalgovernment support and assistance to local govern-ments be provided in the \"few areas where the federalgovernment is in a unique position\"to do so  \nThree months in preparation,the report recommenda-tions must be acted upon by Attorney General WilliamFrench Smith and the Reagan Administration beforebecoming truely serious proposals with a potential forshaping the character of criminal justice operations atthe federal level,with consequent impact on state andlocal systems.A review of the more salient points in thefinal report which are most likely to be of interest tocriminal law practitioners followsas a harbinger of whatis to come.  \nNarcotics  \nRecommendations focus on foreign policies andborder policies to eradicate and interdictillicit drugswhere cultivated,processed or transported.  \nFirearms  \nAmong recommendations are a ban on theimportation of certain handgun parts,and a waiting(Continued On Page 2)  \n(Continued From Page 1)  \nThe ABA strongly opposes efforts to abolish or modify  \nthe exclu","cbCaihf3dY0hMhLt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihf3dY0hMhLt","pdf",2981301,"English","# JUSTICE\n## Bulletin\n### Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule opposition\n## Dramatic Changes in Criminal Procedure Proposed by A.G.'s Task Force\n### Phase I vs Phase II focus\n### Narcotics\n### Firearms\n### Habeas Corpus\n### Victims\n### Tax Cases","[{\"question\":\"What legislative change does the ABA Criminal Justice Section oppose in this issue?\",\"answer\":\"The ABA strongly opposes efforts to abolish or modify the exclusionary rule, describing planned legislation to modify the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule as constitutionally questionable and harmful in practice.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the “Phase II” report emphasize regarding federal action against violent crime?\",\"answer\":\"It emphasizes the federal government getting its own house in order, improving coordination among federal, state, and local efforts, and shifting impact through changes to federal statutes, funding levels, and resource allocation.\"},{\"question\":\"Which areas of recommendations are highlighted in the report summary?\",\"answer\":\"The issue highlights recommendations on narcotics (foreign and border policies), firearms (including importation bans and background-check waiting periods), habeas corpus limits, victims’ fair treatment, and certain tax enforcement approaches.\"}]","JUSTICE - Volume 9, No. 1 - September 1981 | PDF",1790709821,23]