[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-271072-105":59,"doc-detail-271072-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","isee-strategic-outcomes-framework-revisions-and-additions","ISEE Strategic Outcomes Framework - Revisions and Additions","","ISEE Strategic Outcomes Framework for measuring informal education outcomes and institutional impact, with revisions and additions made in response to expert explorations. The work consolidates an evaluation system for informal STEM education and details a conference-driven process to address strengths and specific issues. Key topics include responsiveness to cultural diversity and equity, clarity of framework structure, handling outcomes outside the framework, and practical guidance on framework use and future work.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/isee-strategic-outcomes-framework-revisions-and-additions/271072/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/isee-strategic-outcomes-framework-revisions-and-additions/271072.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"4398046744996","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-18","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What is the ISEE Strategic Outcomes Framework intended to measure?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It measures informal education outcomes and institutional impact, specifically within an informal STEM education evaluation system.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the document address cultural diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusiveness?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"It focuses on responsivity to cultural diversity and related principles such as power and voice, including discussions about inclusion and concerns with a codified framework.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What guidance does the framework provide for selecting categories and specifying outcomes?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"It explains outcome types and their arrangement within categories, how to create outcome statements, and how to select categories in relation to theory of change, program logic, and context.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},271072,1789459259,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":66,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":130,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},4398046744996,"ISEE Strategic Outcomes Framework for Measuring Informal Education Outcomes and Institutional Impact:  \nRevisions and Additions in Response to Expert Explorations April 2021  \nCompiled by  \nDeborah Wasserman, Ph. D., COSI CRE Colleen Popson, NMNH  \nApril –November, 2021  \nThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. (NSF AISL \\#2039209) . Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation  \nTable of Contents  \nTable of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 3  \nThe Informal STEM Education Evaluation System ......................................................................................... 5  \nConference Description ................................................................................................................................. 6  \nStrengths and Issues Raised at the Conference............................................................................................. 7  \nGeneral Strengths, Uses, and Evidence of Need ....................................................................................... 8  \nIssue \\#1: Responsivity to Cultural Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, Inclusiveness, Power & Voice............ 10  \nContext ................................................................................................................................................ 10  \nParticipant voice .................................................................................................................................. 10  \n“Authority of science” and potentially exclusionary values & constructs ........................................... 10  \nTransformational agency and desettling Euro-centric ways of thinking.............................................. 11  \nConcerns with a codified framework................................................................................................... 11  \nDisrupting the definition of STEM Learning and STEM Learning Categories ....................................... 11  \nDanger of rigidity, blind spots, and discouraging constructivist learning and other kinds of creative programming....................................................................................................................................... 12  \nIssue \\#2: Clarity in Framework Structure and Presentation .................................................................... 12  \nIssue \\#3: Accounting for Outcomes Not in the Framework..................................................................... 13  \nSocial justice issues and system change .............................................................................................. 14  \nIssue \\#4: Framework Use ........................................................................................................................ 16  \nChanges in Response to Conference Participant Response......................................................................... 17  \nToward a framework that supports diversity, equity, access and inclusion ............................................ 17  \nVoices and Choices Planning for Self Determination: a context that insists on accountability for cultural differences, power, voice, and inclusiveness ......................................................................... 18  \nFramework Visual Reconfiguration ......................................................................................................... 19  \nLanguage to Describe the Framework ..................................................................................................... 21  \nCategories ........................................................................................................................................... 21  \n","cbCaiaIu1UyD3SPL","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaIu1UyD3SPL","pdf",2136626,49,"English","# The Informal STEM Education Evaluation System\n# Conference Description\n# Strengths and Issues Raised at the Conference\n## Issue #1: Responsivity to Cultural Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, Inclusiveness, Power & Voice\n## Issue #2: Clarity in Framework Structure and Presentation\n## Issue #3: Accounting for Outcomes Not in the Framework\n## Issue #4: Framework Use\n# Changes in Response to Conference Participant Response\n## Toward a framework that supports diversity, equity, access and inclusion\n## Framework Visual Reconfiguration\n## Language to Describe the Framework\n## Categories\n## Outcome Types and their arrangement within Categories","[{\"question\":\"What is the ISEE Strategic Outcomes Framework intended to measure?\",\"answer\":\"It measures informal education outcomes and institutional impact, specifically within an informal STEM education evaluation system.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document address cultural diversity, equity, accessibility, and inclusiveness?\",\"answer\":\"It focuses on responsivity to cultural diversity and related principles such as power and voice, including discussions about inclusion and concerns with a codified framework.\"},{\"question\":\"What guidance does the framework provide for selecting categories and specifying outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"It explains outcome types and their arrangement within categories, how to create outcome statements, and how to select categories in relation to theory of change, program logic, and context.\"}]","ISEE Strategic Outcomes Framework - Revisions and Additions | PDF",123]