[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-270420-105":59,"doc-detail-270420-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","isee-4-year-program-evaluation-rubric-performance-evaluation-template","iSEE 4 Year Program Evaluation Rubric - Performance Evaluation Template","","iSEE 4 Year Program Evaluation Rubric provides a structured method for reviewing and evaluating organizations’ participation in the iSEE program at least once every four years. The rubric guides evaluators to assign performance levels—Exemplary, Proficient, Developing, and Unsatisfactory—across criteria tied to educational service alignment, offered services, outreach experience, student sensemaking, three-dimensional science instruction, multilingual learner supports, and financial monitoring elements like matching funds and reimbursement request frequency.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/isee-4-year-program-evaluation-rubric-performance-evaluation-template/270420/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/isee-4-year-program-evaluation-rubric-performance-evaluation-template/270420.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aran","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-21","2026-09-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the purpose of the iSEE 4 Year Program Evaluation Rubric?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It establishes a consistent approach to review and evaluate organizations’ participation in the iSEE program and to report results to the Board for recommendations about continued participation.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How are performance levels determined in this rubric?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Evaluators select the performance level that best describes the organization during the review period and must provide specific evidence and comments to support the rating.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"Which financial monitoring criteria are evaluated?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The rubric assesses matching funds provided with state funds for the last four years and the schedule used for submitting reimbursement requests (monthly, quarterly, bi-annually, or annually).","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},270420,1789455634,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":39,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":129,"read_time":46},137455076865,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","iSEE 4 Year Program Evaluation Rubric  \nBoard rule R277-443-7-3 states that “At least once every four years, the Superintendent shall review and evaluate all organizations' participation in the iSEE program,...report to the Board the results of the review and evaluation, and make a recommendation to the Board regarding an organization's continued participation in the program”. This rubric is designed to fulfill the requirements of this board rule.  \nOrganization: Red Butte Garden Review period: 2022-2026 Evaluator: Milo Maughan  \nInstructions: For each criterion below, select the performance level that best describes the organization's performance during the review period. Provide specific evidence and comments to support the rating.  \nRating Scale:  \n● Exemplary (4): The organization consistently exceeds expectations and demonstrates exceptional performance in this area.  \n● Proficient (3): The organization consistently meets expectations and demonstrates strong performance in this area.  \n● Developing (2): The organization inconsistently meets expectations in this area.  \n● Unsatisfactory (1): The organization does not meet expectations in this area and requires significant improvement.  \n\n| Educational Service Plan |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Criteria | Exemplary |  | Proficient |  | Developing |  | Unsatisfactory |  | Comments |\n| Aligned to SEEd Standards | ✔ | All educational services are aligned to SEEd standards and alignment is clearly communicated to stakeholders | | All educational services are aligned to SEEd standards | | Outreach programming is aligned to SEEd Standards | | No educational services are aligned to SEEd standards | Standard 1.2.2\u003Cbr>Communicates standard for outreach via email and tries to direct field trip participants to grade programming aligned to their grade level. |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Offered Educational Services |  ✔ All educational services receive equal resources and program success |  |  | Outreach |  | Outreach |  | No outreach programming is\u003Cbr>provided | Outreach , Field trips, Professional Learning, Teacher Resources, |\n|  |  |  | |  | |  | |  |  |\n|  |  |  | programming is the primary focus; other educational services are supplementary |  | programming is supplementary to other educational services |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| Outreach Experience |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Criteria | Exemplary |  | Proficient |  | Developing |  | Unsatisfactory |  | Comments |\n| Follows State law and Board Rule | NA |  |  ✔ Facilitators observed following allstate laws and board rules. |  | NA |  | | Facilitators observed not following state laws and board rules | No observed violations. |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| Student Sensemaking of a Phenomenon |  | Instruction is driven by student questions and the need to explain and make sense of a phenomenon. |  | Instruction utilizes the instructor guiding students to make sense of a phenomenon. | | Instruction is lecture driven utilizing a phenomenon. |  | Instruction is lecture driven without a phenomenon. | Desert Habitat- > Plants- > How do they survive in the desert?\u003Cbr>Could the phenomenon be used to wrap the lesson up? |\n|  | |  | ✔ |  |  |  | |  |  |\n|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |\n| ThreeDimensional Science Instruction\u003Cbr>*See Appendix to\u003Cbr>the SEEd Standards. | ✔ | Instruction has students authentically using the SEPsand CCCs with the DCIs at the appropriate grade level.* |  Instruction has students using both the SEPsand CCCs with the DCIs to make sense of a phenomenon. |  | | Instruction has students use either the SEPsor CCCs with the DCIs to make sense of a phenomenon. | | Instruction has students only use the DCIs to make sense of a phenomenon. | Constructing Explanations , Patterns\u003Cbr>Lesson uses more Analyzing Data than constructing explanations. Structure and function may be a better CCC than Patterns in ","cbCaihxxNaXXRrZw","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaihxxNaXXRrZw","pdf",152659,"English","# Organization Review Overview\n## Review Purpose and Board Rule Alignment\n## Rating Scale and Evidence Requirements\n# Educational Service Plan\n## Alignment to SEEd Standards\n## Offered Educational Services\n# Outreach Experience\n## Follows State Law and Board Rule\n## Student Sensemaking of a Phenomenon\n## Three-Dimensional Science Instruction\n## Multi Language Learner Supports\n# Financial Monitoring\n## Matching Funds\n## Reimbursement Requests","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the iSEE 4 Year Program Evaluation Rubric?\",\"answer\":\"It establishes a consistent approach to review and evaluate organizations’ participation in the iSEE program and to report results to the Board for recommendations about continued participation.\"},{\"question\":\"How are performance levels determined in this rubric?\",\"answer\":\"Evaluators select the performance level that best describes the organization during the review period and must provide specific evidence and comments to support the rating.\"},{\"question\":\"Which financial monitoring criteria are evaluated?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric assesses matching funds provided with state funds for the last four years and the schedule used for submitting reimbursement requests (monthly, quarterly, bi-annually, or annually).\"}]","iSEE 4 Year Program Evaluation Rubric - Performance Evaluation Template | PDF"]