[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-642060-105":59,"doc-detail-642060-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","international-task-force-on-child-protection-school-evaluation-committee-final-report-and-recommendations","International Task Force on Child Protection - School Evaluation Committee - Final Report and Recommendations","","Final Report and Recommendations document from the International Task Force on Child Protection’s School Evaluation Committee outlines common evaluation requirements for accreditation and inspection agencies. It explains the committee’s process, including international consultation and alignment with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. The report presents essential questions and expectations to guide whole-school safeguarding dialogue and to strengthen required elements within agency evaluation programs, with attention to local legal and contextual needs.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/international-task-force-on-child-protection-school-evaluation-committee-final-report-and-recommendations/642060/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/international-task-force-on-child-protection-school-evaluation-committee-final-report-and-recommendations/642060.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jiven","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-23",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What is the purpose of the committee’s recommendations?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"They provide guidance for accreditation and inspection agencies on adopting common child protection evaluation requirements, while preserving essential elements of existing protocols and reinforcing safeguarding measures.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"How does the report ensure recommendations align with child rights?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"It states the recommendations are fully aligned with the values statements in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"What are the two domains presented in the recommendations?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"The report describes Essential Questions (Thirteen Questions) for whole-school community dialogue and Expectations (Eighteen essential elements) encouraged as requirements in evaluation programmes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},642060,1792721274,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":138,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":139,"faqs":140,"seo_title":141,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":142},1099513958607,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002390cf8733938c?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1778829742770036399","International Task Force on Child Protection  \nSchool Evaluation Committee  \nFinal Report and Recommendations  \nThe Committee makes the following comments on its work in developing common child protection evaluation requirements for accreditation and inspection agencies.  \n􀁸 The recommendations produced by the committee are for the use of Accreditation and Inspection Agencies. We appreciate that each agency has its own organisational culture, and resulting accreditation protocol/inspection framework. It is contingent upon each agency to use the recommendations or best practices within its structure. We encourage each agency to adopt a multi-faceted approach to child protection in a manner consistent with our recommendations.  \n􀁸 The recommendations are fully aligned with the values statements contained within the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.  \n􀁸 In developing the recommendations the committee has held four ‘face to face’ meetings, has conducted an extensive review of child protection practices from many parts of the world, has consulted best practice child protection documentation, reports and policies from many parts of the world, and has consulted and received input from the following:  \no Association of International Schools in Africa (AISA)  \no AdvancED  \no Academy of International School Heads (AISH)  \no CfBT Education Trust  \no Council of International Schools (CIS)  \no Council of British International Schools (COBIS)  \no Educational Collaborative for International Schools (ECIS)  \no International Baccalaureate (IB)  \no Independent Schools Inspectorate, UK (ISI)  \no Middle States Association of Schools and Colleges (MSA)  \no New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC)  \no PENTA International  \no U.S. Department of State, Office of Overseas Schools  \no Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC)  \no Focus groups of Heads of international schools  \no Independent Child Protection consultants  \no Law Enforcement agencies  \no ITFCP members.  \nThe recommendations from the committee enable agencies to adopt the agreed Essential Questions and Expectations into existing procedures, ensuring the essential elements of the accreditation protocol/inspection framework are retained while at the same time reinforcing essential child protection measures. The Committee believe that the recommendations are not generic and can be interpreted by agencies in a way that will enable schools to develop appropriate and effective policies and practices geared specifically to their particular and individual context. The recommendations fall into two distinct domains:  \n􀂾 Essential Questions; Thirteen Questions that should be comprehensively considered and which form the basis of whole school community dialogue on the school’s policies and practices related to safeguarding and child protection.  \n􀂾 Expectations; Eighteen essential elements which school evaluation, accreditation and inspection  \nagencies are strongly encouraged to adopt as essential requirements within their evaluation programmes as appropriate.  \nEssential Questions and Expectations to ensure the safeguarding and protection of  \nchildren in schools.  \nInternational Task Force on Child Protection School Evaluation Committee (1st November 2015)  \nRationale:  \nThe School Evaluation Committee of the International Task Force on Child Protection was asked to collect, review and assess current external processes, standards and indicators used to regulate, evaluate and monitor school practices designed to ensure Child Protection and Well-being, and determine what measures should be in place in a school wanting a high quality child protection programme. The Committee conducted extensive research into effective child protection practices and reviewed existing requirements of school evaluation, accreditation and inspection agencies operating within national and international contexts.  \nIn developing the Committee’s recommendations to these agencies,","cbCaigXABAISJ3Bo","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaigXABAISJ3Bo","pdf",444482,"English","# Final Report and Recommendations\n## Rationale\n## Recommendations for Accreditation and Inspection Agencies\n## Two Domains: Essential Questions and Expectations","[{\"question\":\"What is the purpose of the committee’s recommendations?\",\"answer\":\"They provide guidance for accreditation and inspection agencies on adopting common child protection evaluation requirements, while preserving essential elements of existing protocols and reinforcing safeguarding measures.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the report ensure recommendations align with child rights?\",\"answer\":\"It states the recommendations are fully aligned with the values statements in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).\"},{\"question\":\"What are the two domains presented in the recommendations?\",\"answer\":\"The report describes Essential Questions (Thirteen Questions) for whole-school community dialogue and Expectations (Eighteen essential elements) encouraged as requirements in evaluation programmes.\"}]","International Task Force on Child Protection - School Evaluation Committee - Final Report and Recommendations | PDF",18]