[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-35955":3,"doc-seo-35955":29},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"doc_content":15,"file_id":16,"file_url":17,"file_type":18,"file_size":19,"view_count":20,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":20,"is_downloadable":20,"audit_status":20,"page_count":21,"language":22,"language_code":23,"site_id":24,"html_lang":23,"table_of_contents":25,"faqs":26,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":27,"read_time":28},35955,4398048950312,"Violet","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/400002538284de19e3c?_k=1778320343897328908",8,"Research & Report","Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover","The paper examines why the job satisfaction–turnover relationship, though significant and consistent, is not especially strong and remains inadequately explained by direct replication. It proposes a heuristic model of the employee withdrawal decision process that identifies intermediate linkages between dissatisfaction and actual quitting. The model outlines sequential steps from evaluating the current job and affective dissatisfaction, through intentions and perceived utility/cost calculations, to search intentions, actual searching, evaluation of alternatives, and subsequent withdrawal behaviors.","","cbCaifUw8I3OUBiX","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaifUw8I3OUBiX","pdf",242046,1,4,"English","en",105,"# Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover\n## Prior Findings on Satisfaction and Turnover\n## Heuristic Model of the Withdrawal Decision Process\n## Mediation Steps from Dissatisfaction to Quitting\n## Implications for Future Research","[{\"question\":\"Why does the paper argue that the satisfaction–turnover relationship needs more than direct replication?\",\"answer\":\"Because prior reviews report a consistent but not particularly high correlation, the paper argues that other variables mediate the relationship. A fuller explanation requires investigating the psychology of the withdrawal decision process beyond correlation studies.\"},{\"question\":\"What role does “intention to leave” play in the withdrawal decision process?\",\"answer\":\"The model treats “intention to leave” as the next logical step after experienced dissatisfaction. It can represent a later stage in the sequence leading up to actual quitting, following other intermediate steps.\"},{\"question\":\"Which intermediate steps does the model propose between dissatisfaction and actual quitting?\",\"answer\":\"After dissatisfaction stimulates thoughts of quitting, the individual evaluates expected utility of search and the cost of quitting. If quitting seems costly or search utility is low, the person may reevaluate the current job and reduce withdrawal thoughts, then later form behavioral intentions to search and carry out search.\"}]",1782766936,10,null]