[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-600769-105":59,"doc-detail-600769-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","interchangeable-positions-in-interaction-sequences-in-science-classrooms-article-2017","Interchangeable Positions in Interaction Sequences in Science Classrooms - Article - 2017","","Triadic dialogue in science classrooms—teacher initiation, student response, and teacher evaluation—has been widely treated as a barrier to students’ learning access, motivating policies aimed at more interactive dialogue. Yet the triadic pattern often persists even when teachers intend change. This paper examines, with fine precision, dialogue-pattern characteristics in a seventh–eighth grade science inquiry setting and the specific situations that generate them, independent of who occupies each turn-taking role. Three predominant patterns are identified, offering actionable insights for teacher support to reshape classroom talk.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/interchangeable-positions-in-interaction-sequences-in-science-classrooms-article-2017/600769/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/interchangeable-positions-in-interaction-sequences-in-science-classrooms-article-2017/600769.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"dhado","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":34},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why is triadic dialogue often considered a barrier to learning in science classrooms?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"Triadic dialogue—initiation, response, and evaluation—has long been identified as limiting students’ access to learning, including opportunities to learn science. Research and related projects have aimed to expand learning through more interactive dialogue.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does this paper approach understanding dialogue patterns beyond traditional assumptions?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It treats the triadic dialogue pattern as an irreducible social phenomenon tied to particular situations, not merely the identities of the participants filling turn-taking roles. The study then examines which dialogue patterns emerge in those specific situations.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does the study find about dialogue patterns in a seventh–eighth grade science inquiry classroom?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The analysis identifies three different dialogue patterns, each predominating in a particular situation. The results provide insights for supporting teachers in altering the kinds of dialogue patterns that arise in their classrooms.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},600769,1792210096,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":34,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":56,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},5909893218464,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","ISSN: 2325-3290 (online)  \nInterchangeable Positions in Interaction Sequences in Science Classrooms  \nCarol Rees  \nThompson Rivers University, BC, Canada  \nWolff-Michael Roth  \nUniversity of Victoria, BC, Canada  \nAbstract  \nTriadic dialogue, the Initiation, Response, Evaluation sequence typical of teacher /student interactions in classrooms, has long been identified as a barrier to students’ access to learning, including science learning. A large body of research on the subject has over the years led to projects and policies aimed at increasing opportunities for students to learn through interactive dialogue in classrooms. However, the triadic dialogue pattern continues to dominate, even when teachers intend changing this. Prior quantitative research on the subject has focused on identifying independent variables such as style of teacher questioning that have an impact, while qualitative researchers have worked to interpret the use of dialogue within the whole context of work in the classroom. A recent paper offers an alternative way to view the triadic dialogue pattern and its origin; the triadic dialogue pattern is an irreducible social phenomenon that arises in a particular situation regardless of the identity of the players who inhabit the roles in the turn-taking sequence (Roth & Gardner, 2012). According to this perspective, alternative patterns of dialogue would exist which are alternative irreducible social phenomena that arise in association with different situations. The aim of this paper is to examine as precisely as possible, the characteristics of dialogue patterns in a seventh-eighth grade classroom during science inquiry, and the precise situations from which these dialogue patterns emerge, regardless of the staffing (teacher or students) in the turn-taking sequence. Three different patterns were identified each predominating in a particular situation. This fine-grained analysis could offer valuable insights into ways to support teachers working to alter the kinds of dialogue patterns that arise in their classrooms.  \nCarol Rees is an Associate Professor at Thompson Rivers University conducting research in the area on science inquiry education and classroom talk, both in schools and informal settings. She investigates ways that science inquiry experiences are student-led and how best to help teachers provide such experiences for their students.  \nWolff-Michael Roth is a learning scientist at the University of Victoria conducting research on how people across the life span know and learn mathematics and science. He has contributed to numerous fields of research: learning science in learning communities, co-teaching, authentic school science education, cultural-historical activity theory, social studies of science, gesture studies, qualitative research methods, embodied cognition, situated cognition, and the role of language in learning science and mathematics.  \nDialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal | [http://dpj.pitt.edu](http://dpj.pitt.edu)  \n[DOI: 10.5195/dpj](DOI: 10.5195/dpj).2017.184 | Vol. 5 (2017)  \nA18  \nInterchangeable Positions in Interaction Sequences in Science Classrooms  \nCarol Rees and Wolff-Michael Roth  \nIntroduction  \nMany classrooms still are characterized by the expositions of subject-matter-related truths that students are to repeat in (high-stakes) examinations (e.g. Hurst, 2013); presentations are monologic, in the sense that their purpose is to expound pre-established truths (Bakhtin, 1981) . That is, even when lecture-type presentations involve exchanges with students, they remain as monologic as the lateSocratic “dialogues.” A shift to more participatory dialogic forms of teaching | learning, therefore, may be made difficult by the fact that this requires the possibility to arrive at truths that were not previously established (Bakhtin, 1984) . In a dialogue, we may identify pairs of utterances, such as question/answer, agreement/disagreement, or affirmation/supplementati","cbCaig7wk7HMg5OV","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaig7wk7HMg5OV","pdf",637743,"English","# Introduction\n## Triadic dialogue and monologic teaching\n## IRE as a common verbal exchange pattern\n## Staffing, institutional position, and research aims","[{\"question\":\"Why is triadic dialogue often considered a barrier to learning in science classrooms?\",\"answer\":\"Triadic dialogue—initiation, response, and evaluation—has long been identified as limiting students’ access to learning, including opportunities to learn science. Research and related projects have aimed to expand learning through more interactive dialogue.\"},{\"question\":\"How does this paper approach understanding dialogue patterns beyond traditional assumptions?\",\"answer\":\"It treats the triadic dialogue pattern as an irreducible social phenomenon tied to particular situations, not merely the identities of the participants filling turn-taking roles. The study then examines which dialogue patterns emerge in those specific situations.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the study find about dialogue patterns in a seventh–eighth grade science inquiry classroom?\",\"answer\":\"The analysis identifies three different dialogue patterns, each predominating in a particular situation. The results provide insights for supporting teachers in altering the kinds of dialogue patterns that arise in their classrooms.\"}]","Interchangeable Positions in Interaction Sequences in Science Classrooms - Article - 2017 | PDF",1792091346,48]