[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-599679-105":59,"doc-detail-599679-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","intellectual-agnostics-preparing-public-school-teachers-to-be-open-minded-interpreters-in-the-religionpublic-school-debate","Intellectual Agnostics - Preparing Public School Teachers to be Open-Minded Interpreters in the Religion/Public School Debate","","Explores the ongoing religion/public school debate in Kansas and its ideological pressures on education policy, highlighting how First Amendment interpretations and local board dynamics shape contentious outcomes. Argues that rigid, adversarial “either-or” positions prevent constructive, open-ended classroom dialogue. Proposes teaching the controversy rather than using advocacy, enabling secular knowledge and religious faith to coexist in dynamic creative tension. Emphasizes respectful inquiry as a path to soften ideologies and strengthen democratic discourse.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/intellectual-agnostics-preparing-public-school-teachers-to-be-open-minded-interpreters-in-the-religionpublic-school-debate/599679/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/intellectual-agnostics-preparing-public-school-teachers-to-be-open-minded-interpreters-in-the-religionpublic-school-debate/599679.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"jayni","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-22","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"Why does the religion/public school debate remain contentious?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The debate persists because ideological differences influence educational policy and First Amendment interpretations. Competing views often turn into adversarial positions instead of open dialogue.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What solution is proposed for improving dialogue in public schools?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The document argues for an open-ended, critically reflective teaching approach. It emphasizes teaching the controversy and allowing secular knowledge and religious faith to coexist without treating them as irreconcilable opposites.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How does the document suggest softening antagonisms between ideologies?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"By encouraging communal dialogue and renewed examination of questions, it aims to reduce ideological rigidity and move discussions forward. It also cites examples of organizations meeting to shift from rhetoric toward responsible dialogue.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},599679,1792171495,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},3985747859343,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Intellectual Agnostics: Preparing Public School Teachers to be Open-Minded Interpreters in the Religion/Public School De  \nbate  \nDon Hufford, Newman University  \nIntroduction  \nI live in the state of Kansas, a fertile battleground for the frequent skirmishes in the ongoing religion/public school debate. Our state Board of Education has received national attention, and more than a little media derision, for its ideological infighting and for how personal political and religious views have infiltrated educational policy.1 Policy decisions affecting the state‘s educational system have tended to be revisited and revised, based on the power dynamics of the ten-member Board. For the past several years the power has shifted, depending on whether the ultra conservatives or the moderates controlled the majority vote. The latest election shifted the power once again from a pervasively ultraconservative worldview to a more moderate understanding of social, political, religious—and, hence, educational—issues.2  \nLocal boards of education, particularly in the more urban communities, are also continually faced with contentious issues that mirror how diverse understandings of the world impact the public schools. There seem to be never-ending possibilities for emotionally charged, sometimes antagonistic, interpretations of the purposes of public schools. And, we are continually reminded that religious issues are among the most divisive and contentious. The question,―what role—if any—should religion play in public schools?,‖ continues to be asked.3 The question—with all of its political, sociological, and pedagogical implications—is not going to go away; not if we continue to engage in the open-minded discourses that define a democratic society. In reflecting upon the religion/public school question we may be reminded of the Zen Buddhist aphorism: ―There are no answers, search for them lovingly.‖ We are not going to have a single answer that satisfies all participants in the debate. The parameters of possibility are too broad, too infused with differing worldviews.  \nWe are reminded by an educational philosopher that ―(n)either the limited truths of science nor the dogmatism of religion can provide real answers to the fundamental questions of life, which must always be examined anew‖(Kneller, 1958, p. 81) . Perhaps, in ever-renewed examinations—in the search for answers, and for new questions—we will find ways to soften ideologies, ameliorate antagonisms, and allow communal dialogue to move us forward.  \nConnecting Thoughts  \nThe judicial system, in all of its wisdom, has frequently disagreed on First Amendment interpretations of issues related to the question.4 Here again ideologies have entered into the decision-making equation. It is obvious that ideologies, whether sectarian or secular, are endemic in  \nthe religion/public school debates. ―Religion, like other aspects of culture, is often related to struggles over power. These struggles extend into the educational system‖(Spring, 2002, p. 50) . One problem is that, perhaps inadvertently, we have—as a society—separated not just the religiously dogmatic but also the religiously relevant from the public school educational process. As a society we recognize the divisive potential inherent in religious sectarianism. This makes it difficult to allow the vitality of meaningful religious inquiry to share space in the marketplace of ideas that is—or should be—the public school classroom.5  \nThe possibility of ―in school‖ dialogue is made difficult by the fierceness of the ideological debate occurring in the broader society. Differing views too often become battle lines. On one side of the battlements we find forces looking for ways to dismantle the Jeffersonian ―wall of separation,‖ and to restore sectarian religious purposes to public school curricula and practices. On the other side we have defenders of the wall who are just as adamant in their defense of the secular purposes of public schooling","cbCaivXrUsOziBjJ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivXrUsOziBjJ","pdf",159885,13,"English","# Introduction\n# Connecting Thoughts","[{\"question\":\"Why does the religion/public school debate remain contentious?\",\"answer\":\"The debate persists because ideological differences influence educational policy and First Amendment interpretations. Competing views often turn into adversarial positions instead of open dialogue.\"},{\"question\":\"What solution is proposed for improving dialogue in public schools?\",\"answer\":\"The document argues for an open-ended, critically reflective teaching approach. It emphasizes teaching the controversy and allowing secular knowledge and religious faith to coexist without treating them as irreconcilable opposites.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document suggest softening antagonisms between ideologies?\",\"answer\":\"By encouraging communal dialogue and renewed examination of questions, it aims to reduce ideological rigidity and move discussions forward. It also cites examples of organizations meeting to shift from rhetoric toward responsible dialogue.\"}]","Intellectual Agnostics - Preparing Public School Teachers to be Open-Minded Interpreters in the Religion/Public School Debate | PDF",1792089239,33]