[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-432185-105":59,"doc-detail-432185-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","integrity-editorial","Integrity - Editorial","","A 1956 issue of Integrity focuses on the persistence of racism worldwide and argues that prejudices extend beyond any single country. The editorial examines causes ranging from fear of unfamiliar people to insecurity and guilt, while rejecting purely pathological explanations. It condemns segregation and apartheid as forced denials of basic human rights, discusses voluntary cultural separation, and uses Martin Luther King’s Montgomery bus protest as a model of “moderation” expressed through nonviolent resistance and love.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":45,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/religion-spirituality/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/integrity-editorial/432185/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/integrity-editorial/432185.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Fans","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-12","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"How does the editorial explain why racism exists across different countries?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It describes racism as a phenomenon common among men worldwide, linking it to natural fear of strangers and also to deeper insecurity and repressed guilt in some racists.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What distinction does the editorial draw about segregation?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It condemns forced segregation that denies or sharply limits basic human rights, while acknowledging that there may also be voluntary cultural separation that does not violate fundamental rights.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What does “moderation” mean in the editorial’s discussion of Martin Luther King’s actions?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"“Moderation” is presented as the nonviolent, loving approach of King’s movement—love as an instrument and willingness to suffer without hatred toward the white man, targeting injustice instead.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},432185,1791079760,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":44,"category_name":45,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},5909892330395,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","V110片  \n人  \n# Integrity\n\nracism  \nEDITORIAL 1  \nFROM OUR READERS 3  \nTHE ROOTS OF RACISM 5Lawrence T.King  \nSOUTH AFRICA:IN THE REALM OF ABSURDITY 13Anne Taillefer  \nRACISM AND THE CATHOLIC INTELLECTUAL 20Albert S.Foley,S.J.  \nJAPAN,IMMIGRATION AND COLOR 27George P.Carlin  \nCONFLICTS OF MEXICAN-AMERICAN YOUTH 35Herbert F.Leies,S.M.  \nBOOK REVIEWS 42  \nINTECRITY IS PUBLISHED BY LAY CATHOucsAND DEVOTED TO THE INTBCRATION OF RELIGIONAND LIFE FOR OUR TIMES.  \nPublished monthly by Integrity Publishing Co.,Inc.,157 East 38th Street,New York 16,N.Y.,MU.5-8125.Edited by Dorothy Dohen.  \nRe-entered as Second Class Matter May 11,1950 at thePost Office in New York,N.Y.,under the Act of March 3,1879.All single copies 25g each;yearly subscription:Domestic $3.00Canadian $3.50,Foreign $4.00.  \neditorial  \n十  \nWhile the desegregation issue in the South still remains a subject ofemotional heat in America,it remains a subject of scandal to the restof the world.However,let it not be construed as a defense of theAmerican brand of racism if we say that race prejudice is a phenomenonevidently common among men all over the world.The Asiatics whoare extremely sensitive to the discrimination practiced by the white man,nevertheless are not immune to similar prejudices.In Korea,forexample,it was suggested that children of mixed blood(products ofthe recent war)be removed from the country since they would inevit-ably suffer from the prejudice of the Koreans toward those who arenot of their race.And in India,while it may not generally be admitted,there is nevertheless a prejudice felt by the lighter Indians of the northtoward the darker Indians cf the south.  \nThere are an increasing number of articles and books written onrace prejudice which seek to explain this phenomenon from varioussociological and psychological points of view.The racist—it is oftenexplained,and probably it is often true—suffers from severe insecurity,deep-seated fear and repressed guilt,for all of which his practice ofdiscrimination is at once a symptom and a release.But surely to tryto account for every instance of race prejudice or discrimination onthe grounds of pathological conduct is absurd.There is a natural fearof the stranger,of him who is different from us in color,in background,in living habits,which is understandable and has nothing to do withchildhood traumatic experiences.But that such a natural awkwardnesswith the stranger should be enflaned into hatred of a race different fromour own is at once irrational and immoral.And this,it would seem,in proportion to the opportunity the different races have in getting toknow one another and sharing experiences.(In this country one maywonder if Negroes who have lived side by side with white men foralmost 300 years can very well be called strangers.)  \nWhile we join in condemning segregation of the Negro in thiscountry and the apartheid practices of South Africa,we should like topoint out that we do so because these instances represent a segregationof force,as well as a segregation which denies or drastically curtailsbasic human rights.There is,and there probably always will be,a seg-regation of choice among persons and communities.For instance,thevoluntary segregation(separation)of the French in Canada who seemto prefer to keep their own culture apart from the English-speaking  \n刘  \ncommunity.In the light of a sociery like our own which is freer andmore open,we could say that in doing this hey are perhaps imposinga limitation on their individual members,but no basic human rightis violated.  \nIn the midst of the hot words over the desegregation issue in theSouth there has been defense and opposition of so-called “moderation.”Confusion as to the real meaning of the word,as well as to whether the\"moderation\"in question refers to means or ends,has persisted.Yetthe real meaning of moderation certainly can be learned from the activ-ity of Martin Luther King,the Negro minister who has led the busprotest in Montgomery,Alabama.His story is ","cbCaiaW955Eqfsli","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiaW955Eqfsli","pdf",2059397,52,"English","# Integrity\n## Editorial\n## From Our Readers\n## The Roots of Racism\n## South Africa: In the Realm of Absurdity\n## Racism and the Catholic Intellectual\n## Japan, Immigration and Color\n## Conflicts of Mexican-American Youth\n## Book Reviews","[{\"question\":\"How does the editorial explain why racism exists across different countries?\",\"answer\":\"It describes racism as a phenomenon common among men worldwide, linking it to natural fear of strangers and also to deeper insecurity and repressed guilt in some racists.\"},{\"question\":\"What distinction does the editorial draw about segregation?\",\"answer\":\"It condemns forced segregation that denies or sharply limits basic human rights, while acknowledging that there may also be voluntary cultural separation that does not violate fundamental rights.\"},{\"question\":\"What does “moderation” mean in the editorial’s discussion of Martin Luther King’s actions?\",\"answer\":\"“Moderation” is presented as the nonviolent, loving approach of King’s movement—love as an instrument and willingness to suffer without hatred toward the white man, targeting injustice instead.\"}]","Integrity - Editorial | PDF",1790658441,131]