[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-592184-105":59,"doc-detail-592184-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","integrating-web-20-in-health-education-preparation-and-practice","Integrating Web 2.0 in Health Education Preparation and Practice","","21st-century health communication requires understanding how the internet has shifted from static webpages to interactive applications. This review outlines trends in Web 2.0 use, summarizes Web 2.0 applications as platforms for health promotion, provides guidance for employing these tools, and identifies Web 2.0 learning outcomes. Increased awareness can offer health educators new channels for communication and stimulate further research toward best-practice models for effective integration.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/integrating-web-20-in-health-education-preparation-and-practice/592184/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/integrating-web-20-in-health-education-preparation-and-practice/592184.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Grenda","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What does the shift to Web 2.0 mean for 21st-century health communication?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"It reflects an evolution from static webpages to interactive applications that engage users, including blogs, wikis, social-networking sites, and podcasts.","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"What does the review aim to cover about Web 2.0 in health education?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"It reviews Web 2.0 usage trends, summarizes Web 2.0 applications for health promotion, discusses guidelines for using these tools, and identifies Web 2.0 learning outcomes.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"How do traditional media and Web 2.0 differ in health promotion activities?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"Traditional media rely on mass communication channels, while Web 2.0 supports interactive “read and write” webpages, content sharing, and community participation for health messaging and programs.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},592184,1792074025,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":52,"language":138,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":139,"faqs":140,"seo_title":141,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":128,"read_time":142},7971474921005,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","Feature Article  \nIntegrating Web 2.0 in Health Education Preparation and Practice  \nCarl Hanson, Rosemary Thackeray, Michael Barnes, Brad Neiger, and Emily McIntyre  \nABSTRACT  \nCompetency in 21st-century health communication involves an understanding that the internet landscape has evolved from static webpages to applications that engage users. This evolution to “Web 2.0” includes such applications as blogs, wikis, social-networking sites, and podcasts. This review presents trends in Web 2.0 internet usage, summarizes Web 2.0 applications as platforms for health promotion, discusses guidelines for using Web 2.0 applications, and identifies Web 2.0 learning outcomes. Greater awareness of Web 2.0 can provide health educators with new channels for health communication and will help stimulate additional research to further define best-practice models.  \nHealth communication involves the “art and technique of informing, influencing, and motivating individual, institutional, and public audiences about important health issues.”1 As a public health strategy, addressing future public health problems and challenges requires that health educators be competent in health communication.2 In particular, proficiency in health communication is necessary in order for health educators to interact effectively with diverse audiences.2 For more than a decade, the internet has been recognized as an important health communication channel.3  \nTrends in how audiences acquire information have important implications for health education preparation and practice. The communications environment is changing as the number of new communication channels increase, 1 particularly with the advent of Web 2.0 technologies. These new channels, as exemplified through online communities, include characteristics of community participation and ownership, both of which are fundamental to community health.4 A Centers for Disease Control  \nand Prevention (CDC) expert panel has recognized the value of virtual communities and using the web as a platform for health promotion by recommending the expanded use of such technologies in practice.5 Given the potential for these communication channels to influence health education, an exploration of the emerging internet communications environment and the competencies required to integrate this new media into health education preparation and practice is warranted.  \n21ST-CENTURY INTERNET COMMUNICATION CHANNELS  \nTwenty-first-century communication channels distribute information through both traditional and new media. Traditional media, including print newspapers, analog television, and radio, have been extensively used by health educators for mass communication. These channels remain important options for promoting messages, health recommendations, and programs in general. However, the communication landscape is rapidly changing and providing health  \neducators with new media that use digital platforms for production, storage, and dissemination of information. Health education activities using new media, although closely associated with old media activities (Table 1), include a new generation of internet applications referred to as Web 2.0.6  \nWeb 1.0 and 2.0  \nTraditional internet applications characterized by the development and management of webpages are now being referred to  \nCarl Hanson is an associate professor in the Department of Health Science, Brigham Young University, 229-D Richards Bldg., Provo, UT 84602; E-mail: [carl_hanson@byu.edu](carl_hanson@byu.edu). Rosemary Thackeray is an associate professor in the Department of Health Science (229-B Richards Bldg.). Michael Barnes is a professor in the Department of Health Sciences (213-A Richards Bldg.). Brad Neiger is a professor in the Department of Health Science (221-F Richards Bldg.). Emily McIntyre is a graduate student in the Department of Health Science (213-A Richards Bldg.).  \nCarl Hanson, Rosemary Thackeray, Michael Barnes, Brad Neiger, and Emily McIntyre   \n\n| Table","cbCaiufYwI9O4pDT","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiufYwI9O4pDT","pdf",149985,"English","# ABSTRACT\n## Web 1.0 and 2.0\n## 21ST-CENTURY INTERNET COMMUNICATION CHANNELS\n## Table 1: Comparison of Old Media and New Media Use in Health Promotion Activities","[{\"question\":\"What does the shift to Web 2.0 mean for 21st-century health communication?\",\"answer\":\"It reflects an evolution from static webpages to interactive applications that engage users, including blogs, wikis, social-networking sites, and podcasts.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the review aim to cover about Web 2.0 in health education?\",\"answer\":\"It reviews Web 2.0 usage trends, summarizes Web 2.0 applications for health promotion, discusses guidelines for using these tools, and identifies Web 2.0 learning outcomes.\"},{\"question\":\"How do traditional media and Web 2.0 differ in health promotion activities?\",\"answer\":\"Traditional media rely on mass communication channels, while Web 2.0 supports interactive “read and write” webpages, content sharing, and community participation for health messaging and programs.\"}]","Integrating Web 2.0 in Health Education Preparation and Practice | PDF",25]