[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-432079-105":59,"doc-detail-432079-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","integrating-one-health-beyond-buzzwords-and-silos-opinion","Integrating One Health - Beyond buzzwords and silos - Opinion","","One Health is positioned as a central global health strategy for zoonotic threats, antimicrobial resistance, and climate-sensitive risks, yet entrenched structural and cultural barriers hinder its implementation within scientific communities. The article argues that effective One Health research demands interdisciplinary thinking, shared data, coordinated interpretation, and parity across human, animal, and environmental domains. It examines how academic norms, misaligned incentives, fragmented outputs, and governance conflicts reduce collaboration to branding rather than real transformation, especially in low- and middle-income settings.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":35,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/healthcare/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/integrating-one-health-beyond-buzzwords-and-silos-opinion/432079/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/integrating-one-health-beyond-buzzwords-and-silos-opinion/432079.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"eBook King","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",11,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does the article identify as key obstacles to One Health implementation?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It highlights structural and scientific-cultural barriers within the scientific community, including academic publishing norms, protected disciplinary boundaries, and implicit hierarchies that limit authentic integration.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"Why is parity across human, animal, and environmental health emphasized?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"The article argues that integration requires co-led, pluralistic governance with equal standing for all domains; treating animal and environmental health as instrumental undermines shared success.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What changes does the article propose to move One Health from rhetoric to reality?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"It proposes four shifts, beginning with requiring funders to implement clear, practical mechanisms for data sharing and collaboration rather than only encouraging multisectoral partnerships.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},432079,1790808876,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":34,"category_name":35,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":14,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":24,"preview_page_count":4},962088006270,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_085a072bc5b1113ac321206ff7593b45","One Health 21 (2025) 101174  \nContents lists available at ScienceDirect  \nOne Health  \njournal [homepage:](homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/onehlt)[ www.elsevier.com/locate/onehlt](homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/onehlt)  \nOpinion  \nIntegrating One Health: Beyond buzzwords and silos Andrea Antoniollia,b, Claude Flamanda,c,*  \na Epidemiology and Public Health Unit, Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia b Universit´e Paris-Cit´e, Paris, France  \nc Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Universit´e Paris Cit´e, INSERM U1332, CNRS UMR 2000 CNRS, Paris, France  \nA R T I C L E I N F O  \nKeywords  \nOne Health implementation Interdisciplinary collaboration Scientific governance Research equity  \nCapacity building  \nOne Health is now central to global health strategies addressing zoonotic disease threats, antimicrobial resistance, and climate-sensitive health risks. The One Health approach, which recognizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health, is now widely endorsed as a cornerstone of global health and sustainability strategies [1,2]. The recent Lancet One Health Commission has powerfully reaffirmed this vision, calling for a systemic shift toward equitable, integrated, and resilient socioecological systems grounded in transdisciplinary collaboration and knowledge pluralism [3]. However, if One Health is to deliver on its promise, we must urgently confront the structural and scientific-cultural barriers that limit its implementation within the scientific community itself.  \nOne Health is fundamentally an integrative approach. The major threats we face arise at the intersection of ecological, biological, and societal systems. Responding effectively requires interdisciplinary thinking, the use of rigorous and complementary methodological approaches, shared data, and coordinated interpretation and action. The ideal is a research ecosystem in which physicians, veterinarians, ecologists, epidemiologists, biologists, and social scientists work side by side, united by common objectives.  \nIn practice, however, long-standing academic norms often obstruct this integration. Pressures to publish as first or last author, to lead rather than collaborate, and to protect disciplinary boundaries often outweigh incentives to work together. Data remain siloed, analyses fragmented, and opportunities for meaningful cross-sector collaboration are routinely missed; these frictions are further compounded by implicit hierarchies that, sometimes unconsciously, frame One Health as chiefly  \nabout human well-being, relegating animal and environmental health to an instrumental role. This can favour leadership by biomedical actors and work against authentic integration, which requires parity across human, animal, and environmental domains and co-led, pluralistic governance [3].  \nAlthough many One Health projects are designed to appeal to funders, they often lose their integrative ambition once implemented. Disciplinary tensions, misaligned incentives, and competition for recognition frequently result in outputs that are narrow, disconnected, and far removed from the holistic vision that initially justified the work. These dynamics weaken both coherence and impact, and risk reducing One Health to a branding device rather than a true transformation in the way knowledge is produced and applied.  \nEven when interdisciplinary efforts receive formal support and funding, personal ambitions, competition, and fear of losing control can undermine real collaboration. One Health projects, by nature, involve diverse teams, institutions, and epistemologies. This diversity is a strength, but it also intensifies longstanding tensions: Which component is considered most critical for the overall success of the project? What resources are actually allocated to it? Who owns the data? Who leads the publications? How is scientific impact measured? In the absence of shared governance and clear incentive struc","cbCairwBfDufMmEt","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCairwBfDufMmEt","pdf",302894,"English","# One Health implementation: central vision and barriers\n## One Health as an integrative, interdisciplinary research ecosystem\n## Academic norms, incentives, and siloed data\n## Governance, parity across domains, and collaborative conflict\n## Low- and middle-income countries and capacity-building constraints\n## From rhetoric to reality: proposed shifts","[{\"question\":\"What does the article identify as key obstacles to One Health implementation?\",\"answer\":\"It highlights structural and scientific-cultural barriers within the scientific community, including academic publishing norms, protected disciplinary boundaries, and implicit hierarchies that limit authentic integration.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is parity across human, animal, and environmental health emphasized?\",\"answer\":\"The article argues that integration requires co-led, pluralistic governance with equal standing for all domains; treating animal and environmental health as instrumental undermines shared success.\"},{\"question\":\"What changes does the article propose to move One Health from rhetoric to reality?\",\"answer\":\"It proposes four shifts, beginning with requiring funders to implement clear, practical mechanisms for data sharing and collaboration rather than only encouraging multisectoral partnerships.\"}]","Integrating One Health - Beyond buzzwords and silos - Opinion | PDF",1790657975]