[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-325425-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-325425-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","industrial-loan-companies-a-short-history-of-ilcs","Industrial Loan Companies - A Short History of ILCs","","Industrial loan companies (ILCs) emerged in the early twentieth century to expand access to home and consumer lending for borrowers underserved by mainstream banks. Formed through paths similar to Morris Plan institutions, ILCs were shaped by legal distinctions that affected regulation, financing, and charter limits. Although ILCs later faced competitive pressure from commercial banks, they ultimately persisted and expanded, with their modern growth and renewed interest raising controversy and policy questions. The text outlines origins, adverse selection, and the Morris Plan lending model.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/industrial-loan-companies-a-short-history-of-ilcs/325425/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/industrial-loan-companies-a-short-history-of-ilcs/325425.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Maeve","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-02","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",14,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What problem did ILCs and Morris Plan banks aim to solve in consumer lending?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"They addressed difficulties in distinguishing risky borrowers from safer ones, which could lead to adverse selection and credit market failure.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Why were ILCs initially different from traditional banks from a legal standpoint?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Early ILCs conducted lending and funding in ways sufficiently distinct from banks that they were not treated as banks under the law, affecting later regulatory exemptions.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How did the Morris Plan model reduce adverse selection risk without requiring collateral?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"It relied on two co-signers chosen from the borrower's family and friends, using social pressure to encourage repayment.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},325425,1790193536,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,127],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":124,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":125,"show_sort_weight":124,"slug":126},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":128,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":129,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":130},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":132},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":133,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":97,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145,"preview_page_count":4},5909877438554,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/5600025385ad2bf12a7?_k=1778553567797529272","# Industrial Loan Companies\n\nby O.Emre Ergungor and James B.Thomson  \nIndustral lan companies have been apart of the financial landscape forthe better part of a century,but untilrecently,not many people outside ofbanking circles had heard of them.Muchlike early-twentieth-centurybuilding and loan associations,whichfilled a void in home loans left by main-stream financial institutions,industrialloan companies(ILCs)arose to fill avoid in unsecured consumer lending.  \nWhen the first ILC came into existencein 1910.the way it conducted busi-ness—from its approach to consumerlending to the way it funded loans—was sufficiently different from tradi-tional banks that it and the institutionsthat evolved from it were not consid-ered to be banks from a legal stand-point.This legal distinction would keepLCs exempt from certain types of bankregulation in later decades.  \nWhen commercial banks finally warmedup to the business of unsecured con-sumer lending in the 1920s and began tosurpass the ILCs in the market in laterdecades,it seemed as though the ILCindustry would be relegated to a footnotein financial history.The limited nature ofthe ILC charter placed these institutionsat a competitive disadvantage to otherconsumer lenders in the market.  \nYet not only have ILCs survived,theyhave begun to grow.At the end of 2004,there were 57ILCs in existence withcombined assets ofS140 billion—upfrom $3.8 billion in 1987—and six ofthese ILCs ranked among the largest180 financial institutions in the nation,according to a 2005 GAO report.Thelargest ILC has over S66 billion inassets,making it one of the top-25commercial banking companies in theUnited States.  \nThe marked increase in the size of theaverage ILC,the growth of the industry'scombined assets,and the recent well-pub-licized applications for ILC charters bylarge commercial firms sugges that theseinstitutions are becoming more than nicheplayers in financial markets.Below,wetake a look at some reasons why.  \n## ■AShort History of ILCs\n\nLCs emerged from the Morris Planbanks of the early twentieth centuryThe name “Morris Plan”comes from aVirginia lawyer,Arthur J.Morris,whoin 1910 began providing loans to low-and moderate-income workers who hadstable jobs but did not have access tocredit from commercial banks.  \nBanks of the time were reluctant to lendto these workersbecause it was difficultfor them to distinguish between work-ers who were likely to repay their loansand those who were not.Such a diffi-culty can lead to an acverse selectionproblem,where the only people askingfor loans are the most risky sorts of bor-rowers.Riskier borrowers should pay ahigher interest rate than less risky ones,but when bankers cannot distinguishbetween the two,they cannot set aninterest rate that both compensates themfor the risk they are taking on and is stillacceptable to all borrowers,both high-and low-risk.  \nAdverse selection can lead to creditmarket failure if banks don't find a wayto tell the types of potential borrowersapart.Commercial bankers at the timehad found a partial solution to theproblem by relying on the ability ofworkers to post collateral as a loan-screening device.Safe borrowerscould post a large amount ofcollateralbecause they knew they would repaythe loan and never lose the collateral.  \nOctober 1,2006  \nOnce Wal-Mart announced its inten-tion to acquire an industrial loancompany,a public furor arose thathas brought a lot of attention to atype of institution that has existedfor quite some time,but was notwidely recognized outside of bankingcircles.What are ILCs and why havethey become so controversial lately?  \nIn retum,the bank could charge them alow interest rate.High-risk borrowers,on the other hand,knew that they mightvery well lose their collateral,and theyagreed to pay a high interest rate so theycould post lower collateral.  \nBut most low-and moderate-incomeworkers did not have acceptable col-lateral,and as a result,they could notsecure credit from a bank.Morris'singenious solution to the ad","cbCaiuWRoyWh8ep7","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuWRoyWh8ep7","pdf",1281301,"English","# Industrial Loan Companies\n## A Short History of ILCs","[{\"question\":\"What problem did ILCs and Morris Plan banks aim to solve in consumer lending?\",\"answer\":\"They addressed difficulties in distinguishing risky borrowers from safer ones, which could lead to adverse selection and credit market failure.\"},{\"question\":\"Why were ILCs initially different from traditional banks from a legal standpoint?\",\"answer\":\"Early ILCs conducted lending and funding in ways sufficiently distinct from banks that they were not treated as banks under the law, affecting later regulatory exemptions.\"},{\"question\":\"How did the Morris Plan model reduce adverse selection risk without requiring collateral?\",\"answer\":\"It relied on two co-signers chosen from the borrower's family and friends, using social pressure to encourage repayment.\"}]","Industrial Loan Companies - A Short History of ILCs | PDF",1789970470,13]