[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-599409-105":59,"doc-detail-599409-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","incentivizing-information-literacy-integration-a-case-study-on-facultylibrarian-collaboration","Incentivizing Information Literacy Integration - A Case Study on Faculty–Librarian Collaboration","","Information literacy instruction often relies on one-shot library sessions with limited collaboration between librarians and teaching faculty. To provide an alternative, librarians implemented the Information Literacy Mini-Grant, an incentivized program inviting faculty to work with librarians to redesign assignments and embed information literacy into course learning. After a semester-long collaboration, faculty shared written feedback and participated in a panel, informing insights into perceptions, perceived pedagogical expertise, challenges, and recommendations.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/incentivizing-information-literacy-integration-a-case-study-on-facultylibrarian-collaboration/599409/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/incentivizing-information-literacy-integration-a-case-study-on-facultylibrarian-collaboration/599409.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"WPS_1790064749","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-31","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What problem does the article identify with typical information literacy instruction?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It notes that information literacy is frequently delivered through one-shot library sessions, with minimal collaboration and limited integration into course content.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How does the Information Literacy Mini-Grant (ILMG) program work?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The ILMG provides financial incentives for teaching faculty to collaborate with librarians to redesign assignments and integrate information literacy into their courses.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What information does the case study use to evaluate the program in its pilot year?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Teaching faculty provide written feedback and take part in a panel discussion to share their experiences, focusing on perceptions, challenges, and perceived librarian expertise.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},599409,1792166219,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":36},3985747859154,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","Communications in Information Literacy  \n\n| Volume 16  Issue 2 | Article 5 |\n| --- | --- |\n| 12-15-2022\u003Cbr>Incentivizing Information Literacy Integration: A Case Study on Faculty–Librarian Collaboration\u003Cbr>Jill K. Becker\u003Cbr>University of Kansas, [jkbecker@ku.edu](jkbecker@ku.edu)\u003Cbr>Samantha Bishop Simmons\u003Cbr>University of Kansas, [sabsim86@ku.edu](sabsim86@ku.edu)\u003Cbr>Natalie Fox\u003Cbr>[nataliejmahan@gmail.com](nataliejmahan@gmail.com)\u003Cbr>Andi Back\u003Cbr>University of Kansas, [aback@ku.edu](aback@ku.edu)\u003Cbr>Betsaida M. Reyes\u003Cbr>Penn State University, [breyes@psu.edu](breyes@psu.edu)\u003Cbr>Follow this and additional works at: [https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit](https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/comminfolit)\u003Cbr> Part of the Higher Education Commons, and the Information Literacy Commons\u003Cbr>Let us know how access to this document benefits you. |  |\n\nRecommended Citation  \nBecker, J. K., Bishop Simmons, S., Fox, N., Back, A., & Reyes, B. M. (2022) . Incentivizing Information Literacy Integration: A Case Study on Faculty–Librarian Collaboration. Communications in Information  \nLiteracy, 16 (2), 167–181 . [https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.2.5](https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2022.16.2.5)  \nThis open access Innovative Practice is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4 .0) . All documents in PDXScholar should meet accessibility standards. If we can make this document more accessible to you, contact our team.  \nIncentivizing Information Literacy Integration: A Case Study on Faculty–Librarian Collaboration  \nJill K. Becker, University of Kansas Samantha Bishop Simmons, University of Kansas Natalie Fox, Clackamas Community College  \nAndi Back, University of Kansas  \nBetsaida M. Reyes, Penn State University  \nAbstract  \nFrequently, information literacy instruction takes the form of a one-shot library session with minimal collaboration between librarians and teaching faculty. To offer an alternative to this model, librarians implemented the Information Literacy Mini-Grant; an incentivized program inviting teaching faculty to collaborate with librarians to redesign an assignment to integrate information literacy into their course. Following the semester-long collaboration, teaching faculty provided written feedback and participated in a panel discussion to share their experiences with the program. This case study examines teaching faculty’s perceptions of collaborating with librarians in the pilot year of the program. Teaching faculty’s feedback provided insights into their perceptions of librarians, their thoughts regarding librarians’unique expertise as pedagogical partners, and the challenges of collaborations. This case study considers the successes and challenges ofthe program and provides recommendations for future faculty-librarian collaborations that position librarians as partners in student learning.  \nKeywords: faculty–librarian collaboration, assignment design, information literacy, librarian expertise, faculty perceptions, incentivized programs  \nInnovative Practices  \nedited by Andrea Baer, Carolyn Gamtso, and Merinda McLure  \nBecker, J. K., Bishop Simmons, S., Fox, N., Back, A., Reyes, B. M. (2022). Incentivizing information literacy integration: A case study on faculty–librarian collaboration. Communications in Information Literacy, 16(2), 167–181.  \nIncentivizing Information Literacy Integration: A Case Study on Faculty–Librarian Collaboration  \nThe University of Kansas (KU) Libraries have instituted a campus-wide instruction effort to integrate information literacy into the curriculum. The broad goal to integrate information literacy has been reflected in the library’s strategic planning documents for the past decade. Most often, faculty and instructors at KU request a library instruction session that meets Pagowsky’s (2021) definition of a one-shot: “a standalone session, superficially (or not at all) connected t","cbCailJ8cy17VM8M","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCailJ8cy17VM8M","pdf",175679,16,"English","# Background and Rationale\n## Limitations of One-Shot Library Sessions\n## Evidence for Collaborative Assignment Redesign\n# Information Literacy Mini-Grant Program\n## Program Goals and Incentives\n## Expected Impact on Assignment Design","[{\"question\":\"What problem does the article identify with typical information literacy instruction?\",\"answer\":\"It notes that information literacy is frequently delivered through one-shot library sessions, with minimal collaboration and limited integration into course content.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the Information Literacy Mini-Grant (ILMG) program work?\",\"answer\":\"The ILMG provides financial incentives for teaching faculty to collaborate with librarians to redesign assignments and integrate information literacy into their courses.\"},{\"question\":\"What information does the case study use to evaluate the program in its pilot year?\",\"answer\":\"Teaching faculty provide written feedback and take part in a panel discussion to share their experiences, focusing on perceptions, challenges, and perceived librarian expertise.\"}]","Incentivizing Information Literacy Integration - A Case Study on Faculty–Librarian Collaboration | PDF",1792088713]