[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-582477-105":59,"doc-detail-582477-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","implementation-of-massachusetts-curriculum-framework-in-english-language-arts-and-math-insights-innovations-and-challenges-in-six-districts","Implementation of Massachusetts Curriculum Framework in English Language Arts and Math - Insights, Innovations, and Challenges in Six Districts","","May 2019 brief examining how Massachusetts college- and career-readiness (CCR) standards are implemented in English language arts (ELA) and math across six districts. Based on interviews, surveys, and case-study focus groups, it explores how district administrators, principals, and teachers understand, experience, and implement the Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks, including supports for students with disabilities (SWDs) and English learners (ELs). Findings highlight curricular autonomy, district-wide supports, professional development shifts, and ongoing challenges in differentiation, alignment, and common-material use.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/implementation-of-massachusetts-curriculum-framework-in-english-language-arts-and-math-insights-innovations-and-challenges-in-six-districts/582477/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/implementation-of-massachusetts-curriculum-framework-in-english-language-arts-and-math-insights-innovations-and-challenges-in-six-districts/582477.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Margaret","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-15","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":52},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What does the brief examine about the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework implementation?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It investigates how CCR standards are implemented in ELA and math, whether they improve student learning, and what instructional tools measure and support implementation, including supports for SWDs and ELs.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"How do the six districts handle curricular decisions and materials?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"Teachers’ curricular autonomy is high: some districts encourage teachers to use standards as the core and design their own materials, while others purchase external curricula and may compensate teachers to create supplementary resources.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What professional development approaches are highlighted across districts?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Districts increasingly move from one-day workshops to embedded, sustained practices such as evaluation feedback, long-term coaching, PLCs, and train-the-trainer models, with one district using a full-cycle lesson enactment structure.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},582477,1792066005,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":52,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},137451207643,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_3d24733baf745e90a7e4bdd5f77d97b2","MAY 2019  \nImplementation of Massachusetts  Curriculum Framework in English  Language Arts and Math: Insights, Innovations, and Challenges in  Six Districts  \nThe Center on Standards, Alignment, Instruction, and Learning (C-SAIL), funded by the Institute of Education Sciences, examines how college-and career-readiness (CCR) standards are implemented, if they improve student learning, and what instructional tools measure and support their implementation. This brief presents findings from  \nC-SAIL’s Implementation Study, which uses interview and survey data to explore how district administrators, principals, and teachers are understanding, experiencing, and implementing Massachusetts Curriculum Frameworks in English language arts (ELA) and math. We examine how and what kinds of supports are provided to teachers of all students, including students with disabilities (SWDs) and English learners (ELs) who take the general state assessment.  \nSince our research began in 2015, C-SAIL researchers have interviewed 10 state officials, and 12 district officials in six Massachusetts districts. We also conducted 12 interviews and focus groups with teachers, principals, and instructional coaches in one of these districts. We selected the six case study districts by identifying two urban, two suburban, and two rural districts with relatively high percentages of SWDs and ELs. We also examined other district characteristics—percentage of students receiving free or reduced-price lunch, student achievement or growth rates, and geographic location within the state—to ensure that our districts represented a range of contextual factors.  \nBelow we highlight key insights from the six case study districts, emphasizing Massachusetts innovative practices and notable challenges.  \nThe Center on Standards, Alignment, Instruction, and Learning [c-sail.org](c-sail.org)  \n1  \nCurriculum  \nTeachers’ curricular autonomy is high in our case study districts, with elementary teachers encouraged to supplement designated curricula and high school teachers often choosing their own materials entirely.  \nInsights Teacher autonomy in making curricular decisions is valued across the six case study districts, though they are taking different approaches at varying levels of the system.  \n» In two districts, district officials encouraged teachers to consider the standards to be their central curriculum and to design their own materials around them. One of these districts utilized “curriculum committees” to assist in this task.  \n» Three districts purchased external curricula after realizing that the prior curriculum was either not aligned to the standards, disjointed across schools and teachers, or both. However, two of these districts then paid teachers to design supplementary materials, such as curriculum maps, rubrics, and writing protocols; one of these districts included more than  \n40 teachers in the vetting and implementation process, viewing it as an opportunity for professional development.  \n» Two districts said that while they recommend that their teachers use the district-wide curriculum, it is not necessarily used with fidelity and teachers are welcome and encouraged to supplement outside of it.  \nInnovations One district collaborates with four other districts in the region to create and use a common scope and sequence for elementary and middle schools, allowing them to lessen the burden of creating materials on each district and to avoid gaps in student knowledge for their highly transient populations.  \nChallenges » One district noted that its purchased math curriculum does not lend itself well to differentiation, so district officials are working on building teachers’capacity to do this on their own.  \n» Two districts, one of which created district-wide curriculum and one of which purchased it, only used the common materials at the elementary school level, citing high schools’ varying schedules and structures and strong teacher preference as a result of sub","cbCaikoaCeNqqVxn","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaikoaCeNqqVxn","pdf",295827,"English","# Curriculum\n## Teacher autonomy in curricular decisions\n## Innovations: common scope and sequence\n## Challenges: differentiation and common materials\n# Professional Development (PD)\n## Shift from workshop to embedded practices\n## Use of PLCs and coaching models\n## Classroom-embedded lesson enactment cycle","[{\"question\":\"What does the brief examine about the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework implementation?\",\"answer\":\"It investigates how CCR standards are implemented in ELA and math, whether they improve student learning, and what instructional tools measure and support implementation, including supports for SWDs and ELs.\"},{\"question\":\"How do the six districts handle curricular decisions and materials?\",\"answer\":\"Teachers’ curricular autonomy is high: some districts encourage teachers to use standards as the core and design their own materials, while others purchase external curricula and may compensate teachers to create supplementary resources.\"},{\"question\":\"What professional development approaches are highlighted across districts?\",\"answer\":\"Districts increasingly move from one-day workshops to embedded, sustained practices such as evaluation feedback, long-term coaching, PLCs, and train-the-trainer models, with one district using a full-cycle lesson enactment structure.\"}]","Implementation of Massachusetts Curriculum Framework in English Language Arts and Math - Insights, Innovations, and Challenges in Six Districts | PDF",1792043484,18]