[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-437192-105":59,"doc-detail-437192-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","ignition-interlock-program-best-practices-guide-september-2018","Ignition Interlock Program Best Practices Guide - September 2018","","Ignition interlock devices reduce alcohol-impaired driving by preventing repeated attempts after enforcement actions. The report synthesizes evidence and jurisdictional experience, noting over 10,000 deaths yearly in the United States from alcohol-related crashes and data showing substantial prevention of impaired-driving attempts since 2006. It addresses the absence of a national “model program,” compares administrative, judicial, and hybrid structures, and targets core challenges such as compliance enforcement and officer familiarity at vehicle stop.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/ignition-interlock-program-best-practices-guide-september-2018/437192/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/ignition-interlock-program-best-practices-guide-september-2018/437192.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Damian","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-30","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":8},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What public health benefit does the report describe for ignition interlock devices?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"It describes a public health benefit through reducing offender recidivism and preventing alcohol-impaired driving attempts, supported by evidence gathered from multiple ignition interlock providers.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"Why is reciprocity difficult across jurisdictions, according to the report?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The report explains that jurisdictions may use different program structures—administrative, judicial, or hybrid—creating challenges for consistent treatment of interlock conditions between jurisdictions.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What main enforcement challenge does the report highlight?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"A primary challenge is the lack of compliance enforcement, driven by the absence of common restrictions and reciprocal treatment across jurisdictions and by law-enforcement familiarity gaps about devices and program requirements at the time of a stop.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},437192,1790740921,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":8,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":145},137451208677,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","Ignition Interlock  \nEvidence-Based Research  \nLegislation Law  \nEnforcement DMV Program Training  \nStandardization  \nIgnition Interlock Program Best Practices Guide  \nSeptember 2018  \nLAW ENFORCEMENT STANDING COMMITTEE & DRIVER STANDING COMMITTEE IGNITION INTERLOCK PROGRAM BEST PRACTICES WORKING GROUP  \n2018 © Copyright All Rights Reserved  \nAmerican Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators  \nCover photo credits: “Man Breathing Into Breathalyzer” Stock video clip © zstockphotos; “Ignition Interlock Device”© Washington State Traffic Safety Commission; “Ignition Start/Stop Button”© [olm26250/Thinkstockphotos.com](olm26250/Thinkstockphotos.com)  \nContents  \nExecutive Summary  ...................................................................... 2  \nChapter One Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device: History and Background  .................. 4  \nChapter Two Ignition Interlock Program Types  ............................................. 8  \nChapter Three Regulatory Standards  ....................................................... 10  \nChapter Four Ignition Interlock Program Architecture: Manufacturer Oversight  .................. 12  \nChapter Five Ignition Interlock Program Architecture: Participant Oversight  .................... 22  \nChapter Six Standardized Reporting Process  .............................................. 32  \nChapter Seven Reciprocity  ............................................................... 35  \nChapter Eight Outreach and Education  .................................................... 41  \nGlossary of Terms: AIIPA Best Practices and Standardized Vocabulary  .................................. 44  \nResearch and Relevant Reference Citations  ....................................................... 47  \nAppendix A Summary of AAMVA Member Ignition Interlock Program Survey (2017)  .................. 49  \nAppendix B Model Ignition Interlock Program Legislation  ....................................... 51  \nAppendix C Florida and North Carolina Medical Exemption Forms  ............................... 55  \nAppendix D Washington State Patrol Compliance Check Door Hanger  .............................. 58  \nAppendix E Sample Ignition Interlock Service Report ........................................... 59  \nAppendix F AAMVA 2018 Ignition Interlock Working Group Roster  ............................... 60  \nContents 1  \nExecutive Summary  \nMore than 10,000 people die every year in alcoholrelated crashes in the United States and nearly 500 more in Canada  . Data collected from 11 ignition interlock providers showed that ignition interlock devices prevented 350,000 alcohol-impaired driving attempts in 2016 and 2 .3 million since 2006 .  \nResearch documents the public health benefit of ignition interlock devices in reducing offender recidivism  . Every jurisdiction has an ignition interlock law of some kind  . However, there is no “model program” or national strategy that addresses every component of an ignition interlock program  . One of the challenges of creating a “model” ignition interlock program is that some jurisdictions have strictly administrative programs that are the responsibility of the motor vehicle administration, some jurisdictions have judicial programs that are the responsibility of the courts, and still other jurisdictions have hybrid programs that combine administrative and judicial responsibility  .  \nThe 2018 Working Group convened to update and enhance the 2015 document and formulate recommendations to solve jurisdictional reciprocity challenges. Toward that end, model legislation was updated, andAAMVA system enhancements are recommended.  \nOne of the primary challenges of any ignition interlock program is the lack of compliance enforcement  . This is due in part to the absence of a common restriction and reciprocal treatment across  \n2 Executive Summary  \njurisdictions and in part to the lack of familiarity bylaw enforcement officers about ignition interlock devices and program requiremen","cbCaie6zs8hhZpqG","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaie6zs8hhZpqG","pdf",10557929,64,"English","# Executive Summary\n# Chapter One Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device: History and Background\n# Chapter Two Ignition Interlock Program Types\n# Chapter Three Regulatory Standards\n# Chapter Four Ignition Interlock Program Architecture: Manufacturer Oversight\n# Chapter Five Ignition Interlock Program Architecture: Participant Oversight\n# Chapter Six Standardized Reporting Process\n# Chapter Seven Reciprocity\n# Chapter Eight Outreach and Education\n# Glossary of Terms: AIIPA Best Practices and Standardized Vocabulary\n# Research and Relevant Reference Citations\n# Appendix A Summary of AAMVA Member Ignition Interlock Program Survey (2017)\n# Appendix B Model Ignition Interlock Program Legislation\n# Appendix C Florida and North Carolina Medical Exemption Forms\n# Appendix D Washington State Patrol Compliance Check Door Hanger\n# Appendix E Sample Ignition Interlock Service Report\n# Appendix F AAMVA 2018 Ignition Interlock Working Group Roster","[{\"question\":\"What public health benefit does the report describe for ignition interlock devices?\",\"answer\":\"It describes a public health benefit through reducing offender recidivism and preventing alcohol-impaired driving attempts, supported by evidence gathered from multiple ignition interlock providers.\"},{\"question\":\"Why is reciprocity difficult across jurisdictions, according to the report?\",\"answer\":\"The report explains that jurisdictions may use different program structures—administrative, judicial, or hybrid—creating challenges for consistent treatment of interlock conditions between jurisdictions.\"},{\"question\":\"What main enforcement challenge does the report highlight?\",\"answer\":\"A primary challenge is the lack of compliance enforcement, driven by the absence of common restrictions and reciprocal treatment across jurisdictions and by law-enforcement familiarity gaps about devices and program requirements at the time of a stop.\"}]","Ignition Interlock Program Best Practices Guide - September 2018 | PDF",1790680573,161]