[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-33349":3,"doc-seo-33349":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":19,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},33349,5909877438554,"Maeve","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/5600025385ad2bf12a7?_k=1778553567797529272",2,"Literature","Ian James The New French Philosophy Polity (2012)","Ian James’ The New French Philosophy (2012) frames “newness” as a philosophical challenge involving novelty, transformation, causality and determinism, and the distinct identity of French thought. The introduction situates the claim of rupture against how French philosophy since the 1960s has treated the “new” as a central concern, drawing connections to Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and to contemporaries such as Lyotard and Derrida. It outlines how events and instability in language open possibilities for new discourse, addressees, genres, and meanings.","cbCain7CT0bDCcM6","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCain7CT0bDCcM6","pdf",5094352,1,226,"English","en","# Introduction: The Demands of Thought\n## Jean-Luc Marion: Appearing and Givenness\n## Jean-Luc Nancy: The Infinity of Sense\n## Bernard Stiegler: The Time of Technics\n## Catherine Malabou: The Destiny of Form\n## Jacques Rancière: The Space of Equality\n## Alain Badiou: The Science of the Real\n## François Laruelle: Beginning with the One\n## Conclusion: The Technique of Thought","[{\"question\":\"What does the book claim by referring to “The New French Philosophy”?\",\"answer\":\"It argues that thought may have decisively transformed itself, asserting a discontinuity or rupture between earlier and later modes of thinking. The introduction treats this as a philosophical problem in its own right.\"},{\"question\":\"Which philosophical issues does the introduction say the claim of “newness” raises?\",\"answer\":\"The text highlights questions about the possibility of novelty, causality and determinism, and how transformation or change should be understood. It also raises questions about whether the result is specifically French rather than European more broadly.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the introduction relate the “new” to thinkers like Deleuze and Lyotard?\",\"answer\":\"It connects the production of the “new” to Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and to Lyotard’s ideas of the event and the “differend.” These notions emphasize how existing discourse is contested, destabilized, and can generate new addressees, meanings, genres, and referents.\"}]",1782207572,348,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":83,"head_meta":85,"extra_data":87,"updated_unix":25},105,"ian-james-the-new-french-philosophy-polity-2012","",{"@graph":34,"@context":82},[35,51,65],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,45,48],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":11},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",{"item":46,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":47},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/literature/",3,{"item":49,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":50},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/ian-james-the-new-french-philosophy-polity-2012/33349/",4,{"url":49,"name":13,"@type":52,"author":53,"headline":13,"publisher":55,"fileFormat":58,"description":14,"dateModified":59,"datePublished":59,"encodingFormat":58,"isAccessibleForFree":60,"interactionStatistic":61},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":54},"Person",{"url":39,"name":56,"@type":57},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-06-23",true,{"@type":62,"interactionType":63,"userInteractionCount":19},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":64},"ViewAction",{"@type":66,"mainEntity":67},"FAQPage",[68,74,78],{"name":69,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What does the book claim by referring to “The New French Philosophy”?","Question",{"text":72,"@type":73},"It argues that thought may have decisively transformed itself, asserting a discontinuity or rupture between earlier and later modes of thinking. The introduction treats this as a philosophical problem in its own right.","Answer",{"name":75,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":76},"Which philosophical issues does the introduction say the claim of “newness” raises?",{"text":77,"@type":73},"The text highlights questions about the possibility of novelty, causality and determinism, and how transformation or change should be understood. It also raises questions about whether the result is specifically French rather than European more broadly.",{"name":79,"@type":70,"acceptedAnswer":80},"How does the introduction relate the “new” to thinkers like Deleuze and Lyotard?",{"text":81,"@type":73},"It connects the production of the “new” to Deleuze’s philosophy of difference and to Lyotard’s ideas of the event and the “differend.” These notions emphasize how existing discourse is contested, destabilized, and can generate new addressees, meanings, genres, and referents.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":49,"og:type":84,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":56,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":86,"canonical":49},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]