[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-323630-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-323630-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","house-subcommitteerejects-changes-in-ndea-loan-program","House SubcommitteeRejects Changes InNDEA Loan Program","","Report text summarizes a House Special Subcommittee on Education decision on March 17, rejecting the Administration’s proposal to phase out the National Defense Student Loan (NDEA) Program for the coming academic year. The Subcommittee approved keeping the program “as it has been” for fiscal 1967, emphasized urgency and commitments to students, and describes ACE testimony, related organizations’ support, and upcoming testimony before an Appropriations Subcommittee. It also outlines ACE’s student deferment guidance and associated Selective Service regulation principles.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/house-subcommitteerejects-changes-in-ndea-loan-program/323630/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/house-subcommitteerejects-changes-in-ndea-loan-program/323630.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Eden","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-29","2026-09-21",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",7,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What decision did the House Special Subcommittee on Education make regarding the NDEA loan program?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"It rejected the Administration’s proposal to phase out the NDEA Student Loan Program and unanimously approved keeping the program “as it has been” for fiscal 1967.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"Why did the Subcommittee take this action, according to Representative Edith Green?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"She cited a “tremendous concern over the urgency” of the NDEA loan situation and the need for institutions to make commitments to students in the next two or three weeks.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What guidance did the American Council on Education provide about student draft deferment?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"ACE issued a statement outlining how full-time students might be drafted, urging institutions and the Selective Service System to prepare for increased requirements, and included the text of student deferment regulations under Class II-S.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},323630,1790073956,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":144,"read_time":112,"preview_page_count":4},1374391974468,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_29158cc5080c5b710cf443261637dec0","/  \nHigher EducationandNational Affairs  \nACE Issues Student DefermentStatement for Member Guidance*    *    *  \nSample Questions DistributedFor College Qualification Test  \nAmerican Council on Education·1785 Massachusetts Avenve,N.W.,Washington 36,D.C.  \nMarch 18,1966  \nVolume XV,Number 8  \nThe House Special Subcommittee on Education on March 17 rejectedthe Administration's proposal to start phasing out the National DefenseStudent Loan Program in the coming academic year.The Subcommitteeunanimously approved a motion expressing its determination to keep  \n# House SubcommitteeRejects Changes InNDEA Loan Program\n\nthe NDEA loan program \"as it has been''during the 1967 fiscal year,which starts July 1.It supported the entire $190 million previously authorized for the NDEA loan program infiscal 1967.  \nRepresentative Edith Green (D-Ore.),Subcommittee Chairman,said the action wastaken because of a \"tremendous concern over the urgency\"of the NDEA loan situation.Shesaid that many institutions of higher education had appealed for a decision because \"com-mitments must be made to students for the next year in the next two or three weeks.\"  \n\"This Subcommittee feels an obligation to keep faith with the colleges and universitiesacross the country,\"she stated.  \nThe Administration proposed to start transferring the financing of NDEA loans fromthe Federal treasury to the commercial lending market in fiscal 1967,and recommended$150 million to tide institutions over until the transfer could be made.  \nThe American Council on Education,in testimony presented March 14,urged that nochange be made in the NDEA program this vear(see Bulletin,Vol.XV,No.7).TheCouncil's position was supported in testimony March 16 by spokesmen for the NationalAssociation of State Universities and Land Grant Colleges,Association of State Collegesand Universities,American Association of Junior Colleges,and American Personnel andGuidance Association.  \nThe $190 million for the NDEA loan program for fiscal 1967 was authorized by the Con-gress in 1964,when it extended the entire National Defense Education Act.The funds re-main to be appropriated.ACE is scheduled to present testimony March 24 before a HouseAppropriations Subcommittee in support of the $190 million authorization.  \nThe Subcommittee's action was announced to the House in a statement by Mrs.Green.  \n\"This will,hopefully,enable college and university student aid officers to make com-mitments to students during the months of March and April for next year as they have donein the past and must continue to do if needy students are to have opportunities for higher ed-ucation,\"she said.\"Unless the Subcommittee took some affirmative step such as we didthis,according to all of the evidence,would not have been possible.The Subcommitteeviews the Federal commitment to higher education with great pride,but also as a moralcommitment to colleges and universities and to the youth of this Nation.  \nThe American Council on Education on March 17 issued a statement onstudent draft deferment for the guidance of member institutions ofhigher education.The statement was drafted by the Council's Commis-  \nsion on Federal Relations in collaboration with the American Association of CollegiateRegistrars and Admissions Officers.  \nIn an accompanying letter to heads of member institutions,ACE President Logan Wilsonsaid:  \nIt is not clear whether,or to what extent,full-time students will bedrafted.If voluntary enlistments and manpower requirements continue attheir current level,probably few students will be inducted.But since bothare unpredictable,we believe that our institutions and the Selective ServiceSystem must be prepared to meet greatly increased requirements.  \nThe text of the statement follows:  \nSTUDENT DEFERMENT  \nThe current regulations governing student deferment are the following:  \n1622.25 Class II-S:Registrant Deferred Because of Activity in Study一(a)In Class II-S shall be placed any registrant whose activity in study isfound ","cbCaijykWjAKkMr6","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaijykWjAKkMr6","pdf",855097,12,"English","# House SubcommitteeRejects Changes InNDEA Loan Program\n## Decision to reject NDEA changes\n## ACE testimony and supporting organizations\n## Student draft deferment guidance\n## Student deferment regulations (Class II-S)","[{\"question\":\"What decision did the House Special Subcommittee on Education make regarding the NDEA loan program?\",\"answer\":\"It rejected the Administration’s proposal to phase out the NDEA Student Loan Program and unanimously approved keeping the program “as it has been” for fiscal 1967.\"},{\"question\":\"Why did the Subcommittee take this action, according to Representative Edith Green?\",\"answer\":\"She cited a “tremendous concern over the urgency” of the NDEA loan situation and the need for institutions to make commitments to students in the next two or three weeks.\"},{\"question\":\"What guidance did the American Council on Education provide about student draft deferment?\",\"answer\":\"ACE issued a statement outlining how full-time students might be drafted, urging institutions and the Selective Service System to prepare for increased requirements, and included the text of student deferment regulations under Class II-S.\"}]","House SubcommitteeRejects Changes InNDEA Loan Program | PDF",1789965712]