[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-detail-31440":3,"doc-seo-31440":27},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",{"doc_id":7,"user_id":8,"nickname":9,"user_avatar":10,"doc_module":4,"category_id":11,"category_name":12,"doc_title":13,"doc_description":14,"file_id":15,"file_url":16,"file_type":17,"file_size":18,"view_count":4,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":19,"is_downloadable":19,"audit_status":19,"page_count":20,"language":21,"language_code":22,"table_of_contents":23,"faqs":24,"seo_title":13,"seo_description":14,"update_tm":25,"read_time":26},31440,8796095461564,"Liam","https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d",8,"Research & Report","Health-Related Quality of Life in Early-Onset Scoliosis Patients Treated Surgically","Cross-sectional research compares health-related quality of life and caregiver burden between children with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional growing rods (TGR) versus magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). The study uses the validated 24-item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) to evaluate quality-of-life domains and satisfaction and financial burden. Findings show superior economic burden and overall satisfaction for MCGR at questionnaire time, though advantages diminish when adjusted for follow-up duration, indicating no universal cure.","cbCainzPQMm4NxG1","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainzPQMm4NxG1","pdf",633847,1,6,"English","en","# Study Objective and Rationale\n## Methods and Patient Selection\n## Quality-of-Life Assessment (EOSQ-24)\n## Results and Statistical Comparison\n## Conclusions and Clinical Implications","[{\"question\":\"What is the main purpose of the study comparing TGR and MCGR?\",\"answer\":\"To compare health-related quality of life and caregiver burden in early-onset scoliosis patients treated surgically with traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the study measure quality of life and family/caregiver burden?\",\"answer\":\"It uses the validated 24-item early onset scoliosis questionnaire (EOSQ-24) and compares domain scores between the TGR and MCGR groups.\"},{\"question\":\"What were the key findings regarding financial burden and overall satisfaction?\",\"answer\":\"At the time of questionnaire, MCGR patients showed significantly superior economic burden and overall satisfaction compared with TGR in univariate analysis.\"},{\"question\":\"Why did the study conclude that MCGR is not a complete “fix-all” option?\",\"answer\":\"When controlled for follow-up duration, some positive MCGR effects decreased toward non-significance, while TGR remained a viable treatment option for early-onset scoliosis.\"}]",1779483705,15,{"code":4,"msg":28,"data":29},"ok",{"site_id":30,"language":22,"slug":31,"title":13,"keywords":32,"description":14,"schema_data":33,"social_meta":88,"head_meta":90,"extra_data":92,"updated_unix":25},105,"health-related-quality-of-life-in-early-onset-scoliosis-patients-treated-surgically","",{"@graph":34,"@context":87},[35,52,66],{"@type":36,"itemListElement":37},"BreadcrumbList",[38,42,46,49],{"item":39,"name":40,"@type":41,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":43,"name":44,"@type":41,"position":45},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":47,"name":12,"@type":41,"position":48},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":50,"name":13,"@type":41,"position":51},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/health-related-quality-of-life-in-early-onset-scoliosis-patients-treated-surgically/31440/",4,{"url":50,"name":13,"@type":53,"author":54,"headline":13,"publisher":56,"fileFormat":59,"description":14,"dateModified":60,"datePublished":60,"encodingFormat":59,"isAccessibleForFree":61,"interactionStatistic":62},"DigitalDocument",{"name":9,"@type":55},"Person",{"url":39,"name":57,"@type":58},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-05-22",true,{"@type":63,"interactionType":64,"userInteractionCount":4},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":65},"ViewAction",{"@type":67,"mainEntity":68},"FAQPage",[69,75,79,83],{"name":70,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":72},"What is the main purpose of the study comparing TGR and MCGR?","Question",{"text":73,"@type":74},"To compare health-related quality of life and caregiver burden in early-onset scoliosis patients treated surgically with traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods.","Answer",{"name":76,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":77},"How does the study measure quality of life and family/caregiver burden?",{"text":78,"@type":74},"It uses the validated 24-item early onset scoliosis questionnaire (EOSQ-24) and compares domain scores between the TGR and MCGR groups.",{"name":80,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":81},"What were the key findings regarding financial burden and overall satisfaction?",{"text":82,"@type":74},"At the time of questionnaire, MCGR patients showed significantly superior economic burden and overall satisfaction compared with TGR in univariate analysis.",{"name":84,"@type":71,"acceptedAnswer":85},"Why did the study conclude that MCGR is not a complete “fix-all” option?",{"text":86,"@type":74},"When controlled for follow-up duration, some positive MCGR effects decreased toward non-significance, while TGR remained a viable treatment option for early-onset scoliosis.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":50,"og:type":89,"og:title":13,"og:site_name":57,"og:description":14},"article",{"robots":91,"canonical":50},"index,follow",{"doc_id":7,"site_id":30}]