[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-295852-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-295852-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","hamilton-truck-route-master-plan-update-stakeholder-engagement-compendium","Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan Update - Stakeholder Engagement Compendium","","Compilation of stakeholder engagement materials for the Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan Update, including Truck Route Subcommittee meeting minutes and structured notes from Oct 15, 2021. The compendium documents engagement approach concerns, such as inclusion of formal and informal stakeholders, quantification of local impacts, and how values are assessed for existing truck routes. It also records questions posed to IBI Group and City staff, along with responses regarding two-way dialogue, data incorporation, and public information mechanisms.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/hamilton-truck-route-master-plan-update-stakeholder-engagement-compendium/295852/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/hamilton-truck-route-master-plan-update-stakeholder-engagement-compendium/295852.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Maeve","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-24","2026-09-18",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",10,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What stakeholder engagement concerns were raised during the Truck Route Subcommittee meeting?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"Concerns included failing to recognize formal and informal community organizations as legitimate stakeholders and insufficient integration of priority liveability impacts related to shortcutting trucks.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How does the document describe engagement intended for organized versus unorganized stakeholders?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"Organized stakeholder groups participate through a moderated facilitated panel focus group, while unorganized individuals engage through the Public Information Centre (PIC) and other activities such as pop-ups.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"What approach is described for developing the study vision and identifying problems?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"IBI Group states it will consult with stakeholders throughout Stage 1 to determine problems and shape the vision, leveraging the City’s existing vision and objectives from city policy documents, then applying them to the trucking network.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},295852,1789724597,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,115,120,123,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":112,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":113,"slug":114},8,30,"research-report",{"id":116,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":117,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":119},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":118,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":121,"show_sort_weight":118,"slug":122},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":55,"slug":125},"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":112,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":139,"language":140,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":80,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},5909877438554,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/5600025385ad2bf12a7?_k=1778553567797529272","# Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan UpdateStakeholder Engagement Compendium\n\nIBI GROUP  \nOctober 15,2021  \n## Table of Contents\n\nTruck Route Subcommittee MinutesConsultation-Engagement StrategyOverall Contact ListNotice of CommencementNotice to Aboriginal CommunitiesCity of Hamilton WebsitePhase IEngagementPhase ll EngagementAIM SurveyQuestions SubmittedFrequently Asked Questions  \nAdditional Engagement Post November 2021 Truck Route Sub-committee MeetingIndigenous Communities EngagementNotice of Study Completion &Follow-up Correspondence  \ni  \n## Truck Route Subcommittee Minutes\n\nOctober 15,2021  \n## Notes\n\nDate November 14,2019Project No 121911  \nTolAttention  \nNotes to File  \nFrom  \nIBI Group  \nSubjectTruck Route Subcommittee Meeting NotesCity HallCouncil ChambersFriday,November 1,2019,1:00-3:15 p.m.  \nPresentSubcommittee Members:Cllr.Wilson,Cllr.Farr,Cllr.Nann,Cllr.Jackson,Cllr.Pearson,Cllr.Johnson  \nCity of Hamilton:Brian Hollingworth,Steve Molloy,Omar ShamsIBI Group:Ron Stewart,Anna Mori,Trevor Jenkins  \nDistribution  \nNotes to File  \nAction By  \nItem Discussed  \n\n| 1.  Delegation\\#1:Truck Route Reboot   |  |\n| --- | --- |\n| The delegate raised the following concerns about the Engagement  \u003Cbr>Strategy:   | INFO   |\n| ·Fails to truly recognize formal and informal community organizations  \u003Cbr>as legitimate stakeholders in the review process   |  |\n|  |  |\n| a.In response to a question from Cllr.Wilson,the speaker  \u003Cbr>clarified that formal'groups are those that are organized  \u003Cbr>(e.g.BIAs,Environment Hamilton),while ‘informal'groups  \u003Cbr>are individuals not associated with any organized groups.   |  |\n| ·  Fails to effectively and fully integrate the priority concerns about the  \u003Cbr>negative impact of shortcutting trucks on the liveability of the  \u003Cbr>community.It pits community concerns against economic interests.   |  |\n| Posed the following questions/requests to Subcommittee:   | INFO   |\n| 1.Requests that a stakeholder working group be formed that gives all  \u003Cbr>parties a seat at the table.They stated they believe this would allow  \u003Cbr>all groups to hear concerns first-hand and contribute to the process.   |  |\n|  |  |\n| a.In response to a question from Cllr.Nann,the speaker  \u003Cbr>stated they want to be engaged through two-way dialogue  \u003Cbr>with all stakeholders(e.g.goods movement community)as  \u003Cbr>opposed to being presented with information and being  \u003Cbr>asked to comment on it.   |  |\n| 2.How will the local impacts listed in the report be quantified?   |  |\n\n## Truck Route Subcommittee Meeting NotesCity Hall CouncilChambers\n\nFriday,November 1,2019,1:00-3:15 p.m.  \nPage 2 of 5  \n\n| Item Discussed  \u003Cbr>3.Who is making the value decision concerning the effects and  \u003Cbr>evaluation of impacts of the existing truck routes?  \u003Cbr>a.In response to a question from Cllr.Wilson,the speaker  \u003Cbr>stated “value”referred to having trucks cut through the City  \u003Cbr>as opposed to not having them there.  \u003Cbr>4.How can the previous and ongoing data collection by Environment  \u003Cbr>Hamilton be officially incorporated into the study,including truck  \u003Cbr>counts,vibration data and air quality monitoring?   | Action By   |\n| --- | --- |\n| 2.  Delegation \\#2:Heather Ohrt  \u003Cbr>The delegate spoke about the loss of her father,Herman,who was  \u003Cbr>killed by a heavy truck while riding a bike at King/Queen.She stated that  \u003Cbr>removing trucks from Hamilton would create safer streets and would  \u003Cbr>improve the quality of life of residents.She spoke of the need for safety  \u003Cbr>to be placed ahead of economic development.   | INFO   |\n| 3.  IBI Group Presentation  \u003Cbr>S.Molloy stated the information presented before the Subcommittee  \u003Cbr>was focused on consultant-led activities,and that City staff are  \u003Cbr>committed to undertaking more meetings/events as needed.The  \u003Cbr>number of consultant-led meetings is fixed,though there is an  \u003Cbr>opportunity now to adjust the meeting purpose or structured based on  \u003Cbr>feedback from the Subcommittee.  \u003Cbr>Following th","cbCaio9pt8CmGabQ","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaio9pt8CmGabQ","pdf",49830484,1318,"English","# Table of Contents\n## Truck Route Subcommittee Minutes\n## Notes","[{\"question\":\"What stakeholder engagement concerns were raised during the Truck Route Subcommittee meeting?\",\"answer\":\"Concerns included failing to recognize formal and informal community organizations as legitimate stakeholders and insufficient integration of priority liveability impacts related to shortcutting trucks.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the document describe engagement intended for organized versus unorganized stakeholders?\",\"answer\":\"Organized stakeholder groups participate through a moderated facilitated panel focus group, while unorganized individuals engage through the Public Information Centre (PIC) and other activities such as pop-ups.\"},{\"question\":\"What approach is described for developing the study vision and identifying problems?\",\"answer\":\"IBI Group states it will consult with stakeholders throughout Stage 1 to determine problems and shape the vision, leveraging the City’s existing vision and objectives from city policy documents, then applying them to the trucking network.\"}]","Hamilton Truck Route Master Plan Update - Stakeholder Engagement Compendium | PDF",3321]