[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-419718-105":59,"doc-detail-419718-en":131},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":124,"head_meta":126,"extra_data":128,"updated_unix":130},105,"en","gre-scoring-guide-analyze-an-argument-score-6-0","GRE Scoring Guide - Analyze an Argument - Score 6-0","","GRE Scoring Guide: Analyze an Argument provides a performance rubric for analytical writing responses across scores 6 to 0. It specifies how well a response follows the task directions, examines relevant aspects of the argument, develops and organizes ideas, and provides logical, convincing support. Higher scores emphasize cogent, insightful analysis, clear transitions, fluent and precise language, and strong command of standard written English. Lower scores describe missing or flawed analysis, weak logic, insufficient support, and increasing language and mechanics errors.",{"@graph":69,"@context":123},[70,84,106],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/gre-scoring-guide-analyze-an-argument-score-6-0/419718/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/gre-scoring-guide-analyze-an-argument-score-6-0/419718.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"RuangKosong","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-07","2026-09-28",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":105},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",13,{"@type":107,"mainEntity":108},"FAQPage",[109,115,119],{"name":110,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":112},"What does a score of 6 indicate for Analyze an Argument?","Question",{"text":113,"@type":114},"It indicates a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument that identifies relevant aspects, develops ideas logically with clear transitions, provides compelling support, and demonstrates fluent, precise language with strong control of standard written English.","Answer",{"name":116,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":117},"How does the rubric define a score of 3?",{"text":118,"@type":114},"A score of 3 shows some competence but obvious flaws, such as failing to identify or examine most relevant aspects, tangential or poorly reasoned discussion, limited logical development and organization, weak or irrelevant support, and problems in clarity due to language issues.",{"name":120,"@type":111,"acceptedAnswer":121},"What characterizes a score of 0?",{"text":122,"@type":114},"A score of 0 is given for responses that are off topic, in a foreign language, merely copy the topic, consist only of keystroke characters, are illegible, or are nonverbal.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":125,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":127,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":129,"site_id":62},419718,1790812717,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":132},{"doc_id":129,"user_id":133,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":134,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":135,"file_id":136,"file_url":137,"file_type":138,"file_size":139,"view_count":105,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":140,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":141,"faqs":142,"seo_title":143,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":144,"read_time":81,"preview_page_count":4},962090883219,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_276721f389ce27ea32af1340a28f341c","GRE Scoring Guide: Analyze an Argument  \nScore 6  \nIn addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.  \nA typical response in this category  \n􀁸 clearly identifies aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task and examines them insightfully  \n􀁸 develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions  \n􀁸 provides compelling and throrough support for its main points  \n􀁸 conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety  \n􀁸 demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics) but may have minor errors  \nScore 5  \nIn addressing the specific task directions, a 5 response presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed examination of the argument and conveys meaning clearly.  \nA typical response in this category  \n􀁸 clearly identifies aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task and examines them in a generally perceptive way  \n􀁸 develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions  \n􀁸 offers generally thoughtful and thorough support for its main points  \n􀁸 conveys ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety  \n􀁸 demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors  \nScore 4  \nIn addressing the specific task directions, a 4 response presents a competent examination of the argument and conveys meaning with acceptable clarity.  \nA typical response in this category  \n􀁸 identifies and examines aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task but may also discuss some extraneous points  \n􀁸 develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily but may not connect them with transitions  \n􀁸 supports its main points adequately but may be uneven in its support  \n􀁸 demonstrates sufficient control of language to convey ideas with reasonable clarity  \n􀁸 generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors  \nScore 3  \nA 3 response demonstrates some competence in addressing the specific task directions, in examining the argument, and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed.  \nA typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:  \n􀁸 does not identify or examine most of the aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task, although some relevant examination of the argument is present  \n􀁸 mainly discusses tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly  \n􀁸 is limited in the logical development and organization of ideas  \n􀁸 offers support of little relevance and value for its main points  \n􀁸 has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity  \n􀁸 contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning  \nScore 2  \nA 2 response largely disregards the specific task directions and/or demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.  \nA typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:  \n􀁸 does not present an examination based on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer's own views on the subjectdoes not follow the directions for the assigned task  \n􀁸 does not develop ideas, or is poorly organized and illogical  \n􀁸 provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support for its main points  \n􀁸 has serious problems in language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning  \n􀁸 contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning  \nScore 1  \nA 1 response demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing.  \nA typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:  \n􀁸 provides little or no evidence of understanding the argument  \n􀁸 is extremely brief and/or disorganiz","cbCainHJJv5YgDOe","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainHJJv5YgDOe","pdf",55403,"English","# Scoring Overview\n## Score 6\n## Score 5\n## Score 4\n## Score 3\n## Score 2\n## Score 1\n## Score 0","[{\"question\":\"What does a score of 6 indicate for Analyze an Argument?\",\"answer\":\"It indicates a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument that identifies relevant aspects, develops ideas logically with clear transitions, provides compelling support, and demonstrates fluent, precise language with strong control of standard written English.\"},{\"question\":\"How does the rubric define a score of 3?\",\"answer\":\"A score of 3 shows some competence but obvious flaws, such as failing to identify or examine most relevant aspects, tangential or poorly reasoned discussion, limited logical development and organization, weak or irrelevant support, and problems in clarity due to language issues.\"},{\"question\":\"What characterizes a score of 0?\",\"answer\":\"A score of 0 is given for responses that are off topic, in a foreign language, merely copy the topic, consist only of keystroke characters, are illegible, or are nonverbal.\"}]","GRE Scoring Guide - Analyze an Argument - Score 6-0 | PDF",1790618154]