[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-433397-105":59,"doc-detail-433397-en":129},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":122,"head_meta":124,"extra_data":126,"updated_unix":128},105,"en","generalized-expectancies-for-internal-versus-external-control-of-reinforcement-no609-psychological-monographs","GENERALIZED EXPECTANCIES FOR INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL CONTROL OF REINFORCEMENT - No.609 - Psychological Monographs","","Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement examine how perceived contingency shapes behavior. The report synthesizes experiments comparing group differences when subjects view reinforcement as contingent on their own actions versus determined by chance or experimenter control. It also describes development of tests for individual differences in internal-external control beliefs, reporting reliability, discriminant validity, normative data for one test, and results supporting construct validity across multiple studies.",{"@graph":69,"@context":121},[70,84,104],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/generalized-expectancies-for-internal-versus-external-control-of-reinforcement-no609-psychological-monographs/433397/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":98,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":99,"interactionStatistic":100},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/generalized-expectancies-for-internal-versus-external-control-of-reinforcement-no609-psychological-monographs/433397.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Rowan","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":101,"interactionType":102,"userInteractionCount":8},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":103},"ViewAction",{"@type":105,"mainEntity":106},"FAQPage",[107,113,117],{"name":108,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":110},"What determines whether reinforcement is perceived as internal or external control?","Question",{"text":111,"@type":112},"Perception depends on whether the reward is viewed as contingent on one’s own behavior or attributes (internal control) versus resulting from luck, chance, fate, or powerful others (external control).","Answer",{"name":114,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":115},"What does the report aim to summarize?",{"text":116,"@type":112},"It summarizes experiments that define group differences in behavior based on whether reinforcement is perceived as contingent on the subject or controlled by chance/experimenter factors.",{"name":118,"@type":109,"acceptedAnswer":119},"What psychometric information is provided for the internal-external control tests?",{"text":120,"@type":112},"The report describes reliability, discriminant validity, and normative data for one test, and it discusses results related to construct validity from multiple studies.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":123,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":125,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":127,"site_id":62},433397,1790695102,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":130},{"doc_id":127,"user_id":131,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":132,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":133,"file_id":134,"file_url":135,"file_type":136,"file_size":137,"view_count":8,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":138,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144},1099514067415,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/100002539d78ffe74a7?x-image-process=image/resize,m_fixed,w_180,h_180&k=1779092875211072502","No.609  \n1966  \n\n| Generalized Expectancies for  \u003Cbr>Internal versus External Control  \u003Cbr>of Reinforcement  \u003Cbr>By  \u003Cbr>Julian B.Rotter  \u003Cbr>University of Connecticut   |\n| --- |\n\nJulian B.Rotter  \nVol.80  \nNo.1  \n# PsychologicalMonographs\n\nGeneral and Applied  \nPrice $1.50  \nEdited by Gregory A.Kimble  \nPublished by the American Psychological Association,Inc.  \n## Psychological Monographs:General and Applied\n\nCombining the Applied Psychology Monographs and the Archives of Psychologywith the Psychological Monographs  \nPsychological Monographs does not maintain a fixed board of consulting editors.A large group ofpsychologists has agreed to help in the evaluation of manuscripts.The names of those who serve in thiscapacity will be published in the last number of each volume.  \nManuscripts and correspondence on editorial matters should be sent to the Editor:Gregory A.KimbleDepartment of Psychology,Duke University,Durham,North Carolina 27706.Psychological Monographspublishes comprehensive experimental investigations and other psychological studies which do notlend themselves to adequate presentation as journal articles.A Monograph should be completely under-standable in itself.Introductory°materials,including historical and theoretical background,should bedeveloped inenough detail to preclude the necessity for consulting other references to understand theMonograph.Thorough deseription of procedures and results and discussions of implications are en-couraged.On the other hand,the content of the Monograph should include only what is relevant.Tables,graphs,and appendixes which present material not essential to adequate understanding of the studymay be made available through the American Documentation Institute.The procedures for makinguse of this facility are described in the APA Publication Manual.Manuscripts for publication as Mono-graphs should adhere to the standards given in the APA Publication Manual.A statement of policieswhich are specific to Psychological Monographs appeared in the American Psychologist,1964,19,284-285.Publication in Psychological Monographs is free of cost to the author except in cases where author'salterations are made in page proofs.  \nThe following policies govern reprinting of materials copyrighted in APA journals:(a)to requireapproval to reprint for tables and figures,and for text only if more than 500 words [total from one articlein length;(b)to continue approval to reprint,contingent on the author's approval,for articles reprinted]in whole or in major part;(c)to negotiate where possible the dedication of royalties from commercialpublishers to the American Psychological Foundation.  \nManuscripts must be accompanied by an abstract of 100-200 words typed on a separate sheet of paper.The abstract should conform to the style of Psychological Abstracts.Detailed instructions for thepreparation of abstracts appeared in the American Psychologist (1961,16,833),or they may be obtainedfrom the Editor or from the APA Central Office.  \nHelen OrrRobert D.GormanCornelia MeConnellManaging EditorSubscription ManagerEditorial Assistant  \nCorrespondence on business matters should be addressed to the American Psychological Association,Inc.,1200 Seventeenth Street,N.W.,Washington,D.C.20036.Address changes must arrive by thetenth of the month to take effect the following month.Undelivered copies resulting from address changeswill not be replaced;subscribers should notify the post office that they willguarantee third-class for-warding postage.  \nCoPYRIGHT,1966,BY THE AMERICAN PsYCHOLOGICAL AssOCIATION,INc,  \nWhole No.609,1966  \nVol.80,No.1  \n## GENERALIZED EXPECTANCIES FOR INTERNAL VERSUSEXTERNAL CONTROL OF REINFORCEMENT\n\nJULIAN B.ROTTER  \nUniversity of Connecticut¹  \nThe effects of reward or reinforcement on preceding behavior depend inpart on whether the person perceives the reward as contingent on his ownbehavior or independent of it.Acquisition and performance differ in situa-tions perceived as determined by skill versu","cbCaitWcygQ9QiFz","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitWcygQ9QiFz","pdf",2122785,32,"English","# Generalized Expectancies for Internal versus External Control of Reinforcement\n## Conceptual framework of internal vs external control beliefs\n## Experimental evidence and group differences\n## Development of tests and psychometric evaluation\n## Construct validity of internal-external control measures","[{\"question\":\"What determines whether reinforcement is perceived as internal or external control?\",\"answer\":\"Perception depends on whether the reward is viewed as contingent on one’s own behavior or attributes (internal control) versus resulting from luck, chance, fate, or powerful others (external control).\"},{\"question\":\"What does the report aim to summarize?\",\"answer\":\"It summarizes experiments that define group differences in behavior based on whether reinforcement is perceived as contingent on the subject or controlled by chance/experimenter factors.\"},{\"question\":\"What psychometric information is provided for the internal-external control tests?\",\"answer\":\"The report describes reliability, discriminant validity, and normative data for one test, and it discusses results related to construct validity from multiple studies.\"}]","GENERALIZED EXPECTANCIES FOR INTERNAL VERSUS EXTERNAL CONTROL OF REINFORCEMENT - No.609 - Psychological Monographs | PDF",1790663962,81]