[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-427655-105":59,"doc-detail-427655-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","gender-raceethnicity-interpersonal-discrimination-and-cognitive-performance-an-intersectional-analysis-article-abstract","GENDER, RACE/ETHNICITY, INTERPERSONAL DISCRIMINATION, AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE: AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS - Article Abstract","","Interpersonal discrimination contributes to cognitive health disparities, yet the way people’s experiences across multiple social groups interact is insufficiently addressed. Applying an intersectional perspective, the study examines how gender, race/ethnicity, and interpersonal discrimination jointly shape cognitive performance in a cohort of US adults aged 50+. Pooled data from KHANDLE and STAR (n=2,622) with MAIHDA evaluates executive function, memory, and language across 24 intersectional strata.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":40,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/gender-raceethnicity-interpersonal-discrimination-and-cognitive-performance-an-intersectional-analysis-article-abstract/427655/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/gender-raceethnicity-interpersonal-discrimination-and-cognitive-performance-an-intersectional-analysis-article-abstract/427655.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Jacob","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-21","2026-09-29",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":39},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the main research question of this intersectional analysis?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"How gender, race/ethnicity, and interpersonal discrimination intersect to socially pattern cognitive performance in adults aged 50 and older.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What data and analytic approach were used to study cognitive outcomes?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The analysis pooled data from KHANDLE and STAR cohorts (n=2,622) and applied multilevel analysis using MAIHDA to assess executive function, memory, and language across 24 intersectional strata.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What do the results suggest about how discrimination relates to cognitive performance?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Additive effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and discrimination explained most between-strata variance overall, while within- and between-group variation persisted when perceived discrimination level was considered.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},427655,1790724424,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":39,"category_name":40,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":39,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":8,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":81},962084931830,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","Innovation in Aging, 2025, Vol. 9, No. S2 723  \nAbstract citation ID: igaf122.2460  \nGENDER, RACE/ETHNICITY, INTERPERSONAL  \nDISCRIMINATION, AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE:  \nAN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS  \nNatalie Rivadeneira1, Julia Libby2, Timothy Hohman2, and Ganga Bey3, 1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 2. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 3. UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina,  \nUnited States  \nPrevious research has shown that interpersonal discrimination affects cognitive health disparities across gender and race/ethnicity. However, the impact of belonging to multiple social groups on these experiences is rarely considered. We applied an intersectional perspective to examine how gender, race/ethnicity, and interpersonal discrimination intersect to socially pattern cognitive performance in a cohort of US adults aged 50 and older.  \nUsing pooled data from Kaiser Healthy Aging and Diverse Life Experiences (KHANDLE) and Study of Healthy Aging in African Americans (STAR) cohorts (n = 2,622), we applied multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) to investigate variation in executive function, memory, and language across 24 intersectional strata defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and self-reported experiences of everyday and major lifetime discrimination. Model main effects indicate that the additive effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and discrimination experience explained most between-strata variance for all cognitive domains. Variables that define intersectional strata accounted for 17.9% of overall variance in executive function for strata that included everyday discrimination, and 17.1% of variance for strata that included lifetime discrimination. The effects of stratum-defining variables were modest for memory and language (7.7%-11.6%) . However, examining by level of perceived discrimination shows cognitive performance variation within and between ethnoracially and gender-defined groups in all cognitive domains. While the effect of discrimination exposure on cognitive performance varied, the additivity of effects suggests that intervention strategies to promote equity in cognitive health should be universal while tailored to the specific needs of ethnoracially and gender-defined groups experiencing discrimination.","cbCaij8mJaXbwXjO","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaij8mJaXbwXjO","pdf",656340,"English","# Background and Objective\n# Data Sources and Methods\n## Measures and Analytical Framework\n# Results Across Cognitive Domains\n# Stratified Patterns by Discrimination Level\n# Implications for Intervention and Equity","[{\"question\":\"What is the main research question of this intersectional analysis?\",\"answer\":\"How gender, race/ethnicity, and interpersonal discrimination intersect to socially pattern cognitive performance in adults aged 50 and older.\"},{\"question\":\"What data and analytic approach were used to study cognitive outcomes?\",\"answer\":\"The analysis pooled data from KHANDLE and STAR cohorts (n=2,622) and applied multilevel analysis using MAIHDA to assess executive function, memory, and language across 24 intersectional strata.\"},{\"question\":\"What do the results suggest about how discrimination relates to cognitive performance?\",\"answer\":\"Additive effects of gender, race/ethnicity, and discrimination explained most between-strata variance overall, while within- and between-group variation persisted when perceived discrimination level was considered.\"}]","GENDER, RACE/ETHNICITY, INTERPERSONAL DISCRIMINATION, AND COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE: AN INTERSECTIONAL ANALYSIS - Article Abstract | PDF",1790644471]