[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-623740-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-623740-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","gce-design-technology-unit-9dt01-golf-platform-full-portfolio-commentary-sheet-assessment","GCE Design & Technology Unit 9DT01 - Golf platform Full Portfolio - Commentary sheet assessment","","GCE Design & Technology Unit 9DT01 provides assessment commentary for a candidate’s 75-slide portfolio on a school golf platform. The feedback evaluates investigation, analysis/research, specification, design ideas, and development, highlighting evidence of research linkages and measurable specification points while noting areas needing more detail, less descriptive content, and stronger technical focus on mechanisms. Overall level awards are judged across grids with commentary on presentation clarity and iterative development.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/","Exam",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/gce-design-technology-unit-9dt01-golf-platform-full-portfolio-commentary-sheet-assessment/623740/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/gce-design-technology-unit-9dt01-golf-platform-full-portfolio-commentary-sheet-assessment/623740.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Fans","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-01","2026-10-20",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What does the portfolio need to show in Grid 1 (Investigation)?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"The candidate should explore a range of pertinent design possibilities arising from a real client conversation or a realistic narrative for a target market, and produce a preliminary design brief. Evidence slides 1–5 are expected to show analysis with adequate detail rather than being only descriptive.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"What strengths and weaknesses are noted in Grid 2 (Analysis/Research)?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"The work is praised for selecting appropriate research sources, including existing products, ergonomic information, and standards, and for offering a research plan. However, some site work is too descriptive and the candidate should examine tilt and rise mechanisms more carefully because they are imperative to the design scenario.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How is the specification (Grid 3) assessed?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"The specification is considered realistic and includes measurable specification points, with a re-worked brief noted on slide 22. Still, it lacks enough detail, with some material properties described using generic terms, leading to a level 2 award.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},623740,1792757527,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,94,99,104,109,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":92,"slug":93},70,"exam",{"id":95,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":96,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":98},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":100,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":101,"show_sort_weight":102,"slug":103},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":105,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":106,"show_sort_weight":107,"slug":108},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":110,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":111,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":95,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":33,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":95,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},5909892330395,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","GCE Design & Technology Unit: 9DT01  \n\n| Topic: Golf platform  Full Portfolio  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| General Description\u003Cbr>The candidate presents the portfolio on 75 slides, we see evidence for each of the sections of the assessment criteria and the work appears to be of a reasonable standard. The slides could be more succinct and ‘busy’ in their presentation and the practical outcome does lack some finish and finesse. |  | Centre Mark | Mod Mark |\n| Grid 1\u003Cbr>Investigation\u003Cbr>Evidence | In this section we are expecting to see the candidates exploring a range of pertinent design possibilities that grow out of a clear conversation with a real client or a proven narrative with a target market that has a level of reality therefore mimicking commercial activity. Alongside the client/user groups they need to decide on the potential design possibility that they will be working towards and produce a preliminary design brief.\u003Cbr>The candidate does undertake a simple analysis of golf participation in school. The candidate goes on to identify different possible design scenarios within the golf offer at school. There is an examination of the client and in some ways the needs wants and values are explored it is a pity that some of the analysis lacks detail. The analysis is just too descriptive. A good example of this is the commentary on slide 5.\u003Cbr>Evidence slides 1-5 | Level 3 | Level 2 |\n| Grid 2\u003Cbr>Analysis/Research\u003Cbr>Evidence | The candidate has produced an appropriate selection of research sources, including existing products, ergonomic information, and standards to provide an insight to the design context and show an understanding of the design possibility and related issues. This would seem to indicate a level 3 performance.\u003Cbr>The candidate does offer a research plan (Slide 7) which in theory should focus the research, some of the anthropometric data is relevant but it does feel a little like a golfing teach in. The work on matting is relevant slide 12 as is some of the mechanisms work. Slide 15.\u003Cbr>However, some of the work on the site is a little descriptive, Slide 17. The candidate needed to look more carefully at tilt and rise mechanisms as this is imperative to the design scenario, i.e. pitching the golf ball from different sloping lies. We may see evidence of this later in the portfolio and will therefore have to make a decision regarding its contribution two grid 2 or its value in contribution to the development. | Level 3 | Level 3 |\n\n\n|  |  |  | The research summary on slide 22 does provide some linkage between the research and the specification which is to be commended.\u003Cbr>An investigation into materials and processes was largely omitted.\u003Cbr>The award of level 3 is appropriate.\u003Cbr>Evidence slide 6-22 |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Grid 3\u003Cbr>Specification\u003Cbr>Evidence |  |  | In this section we are expecting to see evidence of technical and measurable specification points that are a product of the focused research undertaken. This should also be a product of a refining/renegotiation narrative with the client or a realistic target market/user group. We do see highlighted in yellow a re-worked brief Slide 22, and the specification has some level of realism, there are some measurable specification points.\u003Cbr>The overall specification simply lacks enough detail with for example on slide 23 under material properties there are some rather generic terms such as “strong and high tensile strength.” We do see some limited client input here which is credited.\u003Cbr>This is a level 2 award. | Level 2 | Level 2 |\n| Grid 4\u003Cbr>Design ideas\u003Cbr>Evidence |  |  | In order to achieve marks from the highest level, it is expected that a range of design strategies are used to produce a range of design ideas that address the specification criteria from the previous section. Design strategies include elements such as 2D, 3D, subsystem details, inspiration materials, work of other designers and cultural historical ","cbCaiccTAhhXeZxs","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiccTAhhXeZxs","pdf",127169,"English","# General Description\n# Grid 1 Investigation — Evidence\n# Grid 2 Analysis/Research — Evidence\n# Grid 3 Specification — Evidence\n# Grid 4 Design ideas — Evidence\n# Grid 5 Development — Evidence","[{\"question\":\"What does the portfolio need to show in Grid 1 (Investigation)?\",\"answer\":\"The candidate should explore a range of pertinent design possibilities arising from a real client conversation or a realistic narrative for a target market, and produce a preliminary design brief. Evidence slides 1–5 are expected to show analysis with adequate detail rather than being only descriptive.\"},{\"question\":\"What strengths and weaknesses are noted in Grid 2 (Analysis/Research)?\",\"answer\":\"The work is praised for selecting appropriate research sources, including existing products, ergonomic information, and standards, and for offering a research plan. However, some site work is too descriptive and the candidate should examine tilt and rise mechanisms more carefully because they are imperative to the design scenario.\"},{\"question\":\"How is the specification (Grid 3) assessed?\",\"answer\":\"The specification is considered realistic and includes measurable specification points, with a re-worked brief noted on slide 22. Still, it lacks enough detail, with some material properties described using generic terms, leading to a level 2 award.\"}]","GCE Design & Technology Unit 9DT01 - Golf platform Full Portfolio - Commentary sheet assessment | PDF",1792470612,13]