[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-623687-105":59,"doc-detail-623687-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","gce-design-technology-unit-9dt01-de-fib-mount-full-portfolio","GCE Design & Technology Unit: 9DT01 - De-Fib mount - Full Portfolio","","GCE Design & Technology Unit 9DT01 commentary sheet evaluates a 69-page portfolio culminating in an articulated De-Fib mount. The assessment highlights strengths in identifying relevant opportunities for research, including review of Lifepak and ambulance examination, while noting descriptive weaknesses and missed moments for deeper analysis of mechanisms, materials, and pivots. Specification work shows some measurable elements but omits key sizes and relies on generic material terms.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/gce-design-technology-unit-9dt01-de-fib-mount-full-portfolio/623687/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/gce-design-technology-unit-9dt01-de-fib-mount-full-portfolio/623687.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Bulrr","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-03","2026-10-20",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":24},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What is the overall outcome of the candidate’s portfolio?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The candidate produced a 69-page portfolio resulting in an articulated De-Fib mount.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What does the commentary say about the Investigation (Grid 1) section?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"It credits the identification of clients and relevant pre-hospital care possibilities, but criticizes limited use of client input and lack of justification in needs versus descriptive slides.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"What weaknesses are identified in the Analysis/Research (Grid 2) and Specification (Grid 3) sections?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"Research is often too descriptive, with missed opportunities to analyze pivoting locks and materials/processes. The specification includes measurable elements but omits important sizes for the Lifepak unit and uses generic material terms.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},623687,1792668198,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":24,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":34,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},5909892115043,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_6f874abed73319feea01a86fa6f0fab8","GCE Design & Technology Unit: 9DT01  \n\n| Topic: De-Fib mount  Full Portfolio  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| General Description\u003Cbr>The candidate produced a portfolio of 69 pages, generally well presented and explored the requirements of pre-hospital ambulance care eventually! The candidate could have made the work much more succinct and reduced the page count somewhat. The final outcome is an articulated De-Fib mount. It appears at first inspection to be a mid-level performance. |  | Centre Mark | Mod Mark |\n| Grid 1\u003Cbr>Investigation\u003Cbr>Evidence | In this section we are expecting to see the candidates exploring a range of pertinent design possibilities that grow out of a clear conversation with a real client or a proven narrative with a target market that has a level of reality therefore mimicking commercial activity. Alongside the client/user groups they need to decide on the potential design possibility that they will be working towards and produce a preliminary design brief. This should lead to a perceptive and relevant selection of research sources.\u003Cbr>In slide 2 the candidate tries to explore, in a mind mapping exercise with limited merit. They then, in slide 3 summarise this but they are already falling into the trap of exploring disparate scenarios without client input. Scenario 3 is discounted but the candidate still pursues the other two.\u003Cbr>In fact, the candidate in this case has identified an area of work with real potential, they potentially draw on the experience of expert users and produce a design that could make a real difference. It is a pity that in the first instance they chose to examine some diverse opportunities. They went on to explore two, they would have been better to stay with the theme of prehospital care, indeed within that particular field there would be a range of possibilities, and so they did waste time examining other issues such as field craft. Slides 10, 11, and 12.\u003Cbr>The candidate does identify some clients and stakeholders, and they do look at possibilities within the realm of prehospital care it is a pity that the client input isn't used to focus the candidate thinking on the needs wants and values.\u003Cbr>This was a missed opportunity.\u003Cbr>Here we have to make a decision are slides 4,5, identifying needs or are they descriptive, therefore lacking justification. In this case again there is limited merit.\u003Cbr>Whereas the possible problems slides, 6,7,8,9 all identify relevant possibilities, but the client conversation is somewhat limited and has elements of research. Here we need to balance, in an iterative process, where the candidate may benefit from ‘banking’ some research to support the | Level 3 | Level 2 |\n\n\n|  | Grid two award.\u003Cbr>This is a high level two submission.\u003Cbr>Evidence on.\u003Cbr>Slides 2 to 12 |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Grid 2\u003Cbr>Analysis/Research\u003Cbr>Evidence | In this section, candidates should be identifying clear opportunities for research. In the best cases, this should be led by the client; and the client/relevant stakeholders should be offering opinions and suggestions at key points. At this level, would expect candidates to have clearly identified focused research that it pertinent to their specific design problem that offers clarification or refinement of the needs. This type of research would then focus on the needs and lead into firm technical and measurable specification points.\u003Cbr>We see some research elements in the grid one section of the portfolio (see commentary), this would be credited here in this grid. Evidence from slides 6, 7and 8.\u003Cbr>The research has some levels of reality especially in terms of examination of the lifepak unit and indeed the examination of the ambulance, however it is often too descriptive perhaps missing opportunities to explore pivots locking mechanisms and materials and processes. Some useful research is after the specification which is perfectly acceptable and also enhances the performance in this grid slides 27, 28, and","cbCaicAG7V7QpTH2","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaicAG7V7QpTH2","pdf",134444,"English","# Investigation\n## Evidence (Grid 1)\n# Analysis/Research\n## Evidence (Grid 2)\n# Specification\n## Evidence (Grid 3)\n# Design ideas\n## Evidence (Grid 4)","[{\"question\":\"What is the overall outcome of the candidate’s portfolio?\",\"answer\":\"The candidate produced a 69-page portfolio resulting in an articulated De-Fib mount.\"},{\"question\":\"What does the commentary say about the Investigation (Grid 1) section?\",\"answer\":\"It credits the identification of clients and relevant pre-hospital care possibilities, but criticizes limited use of client input and lack of justification in needs versus descriptive slides.\"},{\"question\":\"What weaknesses are identified in the Analysis/Research (Grid 2) and Specification (Grid 3) sections?\",\"answer\":\"Research is often too descriptive, with missed opportunities to analyze pivoting locks and materials/processes. The specification includes measurable elements but omits important sizes for the Lifepak unit and uses generic material terms.\"}]","GCE Design & Technology Unit: 9DT01 - De-Fib mount - Full Portfolio | PDF",1792469544,18]