[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":3,"doc-seo-534145-105":59,"doc-detail-534145-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"success",[7,13,18,23,28,33,38,43,48,51,55],{"id":8,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":10,"show_sort_weight":11,"slug":12},1,"Document","Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":14,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":15,"show_sort_weight":16,"slug":17},2,"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":19,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":20,"show_sort_weight":21,"slug":22},4,"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":24,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":25,"show_sort_weight":26,"slug":27},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":29,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":30,"show_sort_weight":31,"slug":32},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":34,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":35,"show_sort_weight":36,"slug":37},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":39,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":40,"show_sort_weight":41,"slug":42},8,"Research & Report",30,"research-report",{"id":44,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":45,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":47},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":46,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":49,"show_sort_weight":46,"slug":50},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":52,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":53,"show_sort_weight":52,"slug":54},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":56,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":9,"category_name":57,"show_sort_weight":24,"slug":58},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":60,"data":61},"ok",{"site_id":62,"language":63,"slug":64,"title":65,"keywords":66,"description":67,"schema_data":68,"social_meta":123,"head_meta":125,"extra_data":127,"updated_unix":129},105,"en","fy-18-early-choices-rubric-evaluation-criteria","FY 18 Early Choices Rubric - Evaluation Criteria","","Rubric-based evaluation criteria for a funded early childhood and ECSE-related proposal, structured into four scored sections: Experience and Qualifications (30 points), Quality of Proposed Program (40 points), Evaluation (20 points), and Budget (10 points). Each indicator rates responses across five performance levels from Not in place to Exemplary, specifying what evidence and planning must be included. Guidance covers prior training/TA experience, staffing roles and responsibilities with FTE, consultant identification and PD needs, program alignment with Adult Learning Theory, credentialing compliance, data use for continuous quality improvement, family engagement for children with disabilities, stakeholder consortium details, and budget calculations and cost reasonableness.",{"@graph":69,"@context":122},[70,84,105],{"@type":71,"itemListElement":72},"BreadcrumbList",[73,77,79,82],{"item":74,"name":75,"@type":76,"position":8},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",{"item":78,"name":9,"@type":76,"position":14},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/",{"item":80,"name":20,"@type":76,"position":81},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/exam/",3,{"item":83,"name":65,"@type":76,"position":19},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fy-18-early-choices-rubric-evaluation-criteria/534145/",{"url":83,"name":65,"@type":85,"image":86,"author":91,"headline":65,"publisher":94,"fileFormat":97,"inLanguage":63,"description":67,"dateModified":98,"datePublished":99,"encodingFormat":97,"isAccessibleForFree":100,"interactionStatistic":101},"DigitalDocument",{"url":87,"@type":88,"width":89,"height":90},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fy-18-early-choices-rubric-evaluation-criteria/534145.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":92,"@type":93},"Aria","Person",{"url":74,"name":95,"@type":96},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-12","2026-10-10",true,{"@type":102,"interactionType":103,"userInteractionCount":44},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":104},"ViewAction",{"@type":106,"mainEntity":107},"FAQPage",[108,114,118],{"name":109,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":111},"What are the four main scoring sections in the rubric, and how many points does each include?","Question",{"text":112,"@type":113},"The rubric is organized into Experience and Qualifications (30 points), Quality of Proposed Program (40 points), Evaluation (20 points), and Budget (10 points). Each section has its own indicators and reviewer criteria.","Answer",{"name":115,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":116},"What evidence is required under Experience and Qualifications for the proposal?",{"text":117,"@type":113},"The proposal should describe prior experience providing training and TA, demonstrate knowledge of Illinois early childhood and ECSE systems, and specify staffing positions, project responsibilities, required qualifications, and FTE. It must also explain how consultants are identified, utilized, evaluated, and how trainings and PD needs are determined.",{"name":119,"@type":110,"acceptedAnswer":120},"How should the proposal handle evaluation and data for continuous quality improvement?",{"text":121,"@type":113},"The proposal must describe development or maintenance of an evaluation database, plans to participate in the evaluation, how project data will be maintained, and the process for submitting an annual report. It should also explain how ongoing evaluation of trainings will be conducted and used for continuous quality improvement.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":83,"og:type":124,"og:title":65,"og:site_name":95,"og:description":67},"article",{"robots":126,"canonical":83},"index,follow",{"doc_id":128,"site_id":62},534145,1791775724,{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":131},{"doc_id":128,"user_id":132,"nickname":92,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":19,"category_name":20,"doc_title":65,"doc_description":67,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":44,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":8,"is_downloadable":8,"audit_status":8,"page_count":29,"language":139,"language_code":63,"site_id":62,"html_lang":63,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":67,"update_tm":143,"read_time":144,"preview_page_count":4},2336464648322,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/avatar/2200025388227c56fec?_k=1778556882303663488","| 1. Experience and Qualifications (30 points) |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Indicator | Not in place,\u003Cbr>not\u003Cbr>addressed, or\u003Cbr>inadequate to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Weak or\u003Cbr>unclear, not\u003Cbr>enough\u003Cbr>evidence to\u003Cbr>determine\u003Cbr>whether the\u003Cbr>applicant has\u003Cbr>the ability to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Average,\u003Cbr>there is\u003Cbr>evidence\u003Cbr>that the\u003Cbr>applicant\u003Cbr>may have\u003Cbr>the ability to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Strong,\u003Cbr>applicant will\u003Cbr>be able to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Exemplary,\u003Cbr>applicant will\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes\u003Cbr>and exceeds\u003Cbr>expectations |\n|  | (2) | (4) | (6) | (8) | (10) |\n| The proposal describes prior experience in providing training and TA. It provides information that demonstrates the applicant’s experience and knowledge of Illinois early childhood and ECSE systems. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal provides the following information for each position to be employed using grant funds: position to be filled, list of project responsibilities assigned to each position, required qualifications for each position , and FTE. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal describes how consultants will be identified, utilized, and evaluated. It includes how trainings will be assigned to each staff member and how PD needs will be determined. |  |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| 2. Quality of Proposed Program (40 points) |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Indicator | Not in place,\u003Cbr>not\u003Cbr>addressed, or\u003Cbr>inadequate to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Weak or\u003Cbr>unclear, not\u003Cbr>enough\u003Cbr>evidence to\u003Cbr>determine\u003Cbr>whether the\u003Cbr>applicant has\u003Cbr>the ability to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Average,\u003Cbr>there is\u003Cbr>evidence\u003Cbr>that the\u003Cbr>applicant\u003Cbr>may have\u003Cbr>the ability to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Strong,\u003Cbr>applicant will\u003Cbr>be able to\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes | Exemplary,\u003Cbr>applicant will\u003Cbr>meet project\u003Cbr>outcomes\u003Cbr>and exceeds\u003Cbr>expectations |\n|  | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |\n| The proposal describes the proposed training and TA to early childhood professionals and describes how the project will assist school districts in improvement activities specific to Indicators 6, and 7 of the ISBE Part B State Performance Plan. The proposal describes how data received from ISBE will be utilized for LEA program improvement. Describe how opportunities for reflection, feedback, and integration of skills will be embedded into PD and TA. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal describes all methods of training and TA to be utilized such as study groups, professional grants, and various uses of technology |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal describes how training and TA will be aligned with standards and the Adult Learning Theory. |  |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| The proposal describes the credentialing system for participants, including how compliance with the ISBE Professional Educator Licensure requirements will be maintained. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| The proposal describes the function of the website and what information will be provided on the website. It also describes the online registration process to be used, if applicable. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal describes project activities regarding families of children with disabilities. The proposal includes a description of how families will be involved in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the project activities. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal describes how regular and ongoing communication will be maintained with ISBE Early Childhood Division, and other training and TA entities regarding planning and implementation of activities. |  |  |  |  |  |\n| The proposal describes information regarding the LRE Stakeholders Consortium, including how often the group will meet, who will be the members of the group, and the function of the group. |  |  |  |  |  |\n\n\n| 3. Evaluation (20 points) |  |  |  |  |  |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Indicator | Not in place,\u003Cbr>not\u003Cbr>addressed, or","cbCaimSRkYs3VbxX","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaimSRkYs3VbxX","pdf",344351,"English","# Experience and Qualifications\n## Quality of Proposed Program\n# Evaluation\n## Budget","[{\"question\":\"What are the four main scoring sections in the rubric, and how many points does each include?\",\"answer\":\"The rubric is organized into Experience and Qualifications (30 points), Quality of Proposed Program (40 points), Evaluation (20 points), and Budget (10 points). Each section has its own indicators and reviewer criteria.\"},{\"question\":\"What evidence is required under Experience and Qualifications for the proposal?\",\"answer\":\"The proposal should describe prior experience providing training and TA, demonstrate knowledge of Illinois early childhood and ECSE systems, and specify staffing positions, project responsibilities, required qualifications, and FTE. It must also explain how consultants are identified, utilized, evaluated, and how trainings and PD needs are determined.\"},{\"question\":\"How should the proposal handle evaluation and data for continuous quality improvement?\",\"answer\":\"The proposal must describe development or maintenance of an evaluation database, plans to participate in the evaluation, how project data will be maintained, and the process for submitting an annual report. It should also explain how ongoing evaluation of trainings will be conducted and used for continuous quality improvement.\"}]","FY 18 Early Choices Rubric - Evaluation Criteria | PDF",1791597797,15]