[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-583511-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-583511-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","fsse-2018-overview","FSSE 2018 Overview","","FSSE 2018 measures faculty members’ expectations for student engagement in educational practices linked to learning and development. It collects information on faculty time spent on teaching and scholarship activities and on the learning experiences emphasized by institutions. FSSE results support identification of institutional strengths and undergraduate areas that may need attention, enabling productive discussions on teaching, learning, and educational quality. The document outlines comparisons between FSSE and NSSE institutions, respondent characteristics, response rates, and guidance for using and interpreting results.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fsse-2018-overview/583511/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fsse-2018-overview/583511.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jacob","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What does FSSE 2018 measure, and how is it related to student engagement?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"FSSE 2018 measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices empirically linked with high learning and development. It also gathers information about faculty time and the learning experiences emphasized by institutions.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How many faculty members and institutions participated in FSSE 2018?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"In the 2018 administration, 13,823 faculty members responded from 113 U.S. bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"How can institutions use FSSE results after the administration?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Institutions can use FSSE results to identify institutional strengths and undergraduate experience aspects that may warrant attention, supporting discussions about teaching, learning, and educational quality. The document also provides guidelines for interpreting FSSE findings and resources for analyzing them.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},583511,1792862994,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":123,"preview_page_count":4},962084931830,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","FSSE 2018 Overview  \nThe Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) complements the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). FSSE (pronounced “fessie”) measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are empirically linked with high levels of learning and development. The survey also collects information about how faculty members spend their time on professorial activities, such as teaching and scholarship, and what kinds of learning experiences their institutions emphasize.  \nFSSE results can be used to identify areas of institutional strength, as well as aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The information can be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.  \nThis overview provides general information about the institutions and faculty members that participated in the 2018 FSSE administration, and highlights ways institutions can use their results. In the first section, we compare the characteristics ofFSSE-participating institutions to those of NSSE-participating institutions and the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting institutions. We also compare the characteristics ofFSSE respondents to those of faculty members at U.S. bachelor’s-granting institutions and provide general information about response rates. In the second section, we provide guidelines for using and interpreting FSSE 2018 results, and highlight resources for analyzing and presenting FSSE findings. Resources intended to help with the use ofFSSE data are also on the FSSE website.  \n[fsse.indiana.edu](fsse.indiana.edu)  \nFSSE 2018 Institutions and Respondents  \nIn the 2018 administration ofFSSE, 13,823 faculty members responded from 113 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States. All participating institutions select their own faculty samples. Faculty members at participating institutions were sent email invitations asking them to respond to the online survey.  \nNearly all FSSE institutions (106) also administered NSSEto their students in 2018; the remainder administered NSSE in previous years. Having recent data from NSSE allows participating institutions to examine how faculty members and students respond to similar questions.  \nInstitutions could choose to add Topical Modules and consortium items to the end of the core FSSE instrument. The module on Academic Advising was appended by 34 institutions, Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity by 23, Development of Transferable Skills by  \n17, Experiences with Writing by 14, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning by 11, Teaching Professional Development by 10, Learning with Technology by 10, Civic Engagement by 6; and 2 institutions appended consortium questions. Institutions could append up to two modules or a module and a set of consortium questions.  \nTables 1 through 3 on the following pages provide more information about the participating institutions and faculty members who responded to the survey in the US.  \nProfile of FSSE 2018 Institutions  \nFSSE 2018 institutions were similar in many ways to the profile of U.S. bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities, while differing in a few respects (Table 1) . Although slight differences exist between these profiles, the distribution ofFSSE 2018 institutions reflects a wide range of U.S. institutions, which helps ensure that FSSE results represent a broad cross-section of U.S. faculty members.  \nNicholls State University  \nTable 1  \nProfile of FSSE and NSSE 2018 U.S. Institutions and All U.S. Bachelor’s-Granting Institutions  \n\n| Institution Characteristics | FSSE\u003Cbr>2018\u003Cbr>(%) | NSSE\u003Cbr>2018\u003Cbr>(%) | U.S.a\u003Cbr>(%) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Carnegie Basic Classificationb Doc/Highest: Doctoral Universities (Highest Research Activity) | 3 | 5 | 7 |\n| Doc/Higher: Doctoral Universities (Higher Research Activity) | 11 | 8 | 6 |\n| Doc/Moderate: Doctoral Universities (Moder","cbCaiuo8oSqQey3H","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaiuo8oSqQey3H","pdf",694250,"English","# FSSE 2018 Overview\n## FSSE 2018 Institutions and Respondents\n## Profile of FSSE 2018 Institutions\n## Profile of FSSE 2018 Respondents","[{\"question\":\"What does FSSE 2018 measure, and how is it related to student engagement?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE 2018 measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices empirically linked with high learning and development. It also gathers information about faculty time and the learning experiences emphasized by institutions.\"},{\"question\":\"How many faculty members and institutions participated in FSSE 2018?\",\"answer\":\"In the 2018 administration, 13,823 faculty members responded from 113 U.S. bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities.\"},{\"question\":\"How can institutions use FSSE results after the administration?\",\"answer\":\"Institutions can use FSSE results to identify institutional strengths and undergraduate experience aspects that may warrant attention, supporting discussions about teaching, learning, and educational quality. The document also provides guidelines for interpreting FSSE findings and resources for analyzing them.\"}]","FSSE 2018 Overview | PDF",1792047483]