[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-583487-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":80,"doc-detail-583487-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":73,"head_meta":75,"extra_data":77,"updated_unix":79},105,"en","fsse-2017-overview-general-information","FSSE 2017 Overview - General information","","FSSE (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement) complements the NSSE by measuring faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices linked to learning and development. The overview explains how institutions can use FSSE results to assess institutional strengths and address aspects of the undergraduate experience needing attention. It summarizes the 2017 administration, including respondent participation, the option to add topical modules and consortium items, and provides guidance for using and interpreting results.",{"@graph":14,"@context":72},[15,34,55],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fsse-2017-overview-general-information/583487/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fsse-2017-overview-general-information/583487.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jacob","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-10-30","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":33},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",{"@type":56,"mainEntity":57},"FAQPage",[58,64,68],{"name":59,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":61},"What does FSSE measure and how does it relate to NSSE?","Question",{"text":62,"@type":63},"FSSE measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices linked with learning and development. Many institutions administer NSSE as well, enabling comparison of how faculty and students respond to similar questions.","Answer",{"name":65,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":66},"How many faculty participated in FSSE 2017 and where were they from?",{"text":67,"@type":63},"In the 2017 administration, 24,418 faculty members responded from 154 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States and Canada.",{"name":69,"@type":60,"acceptedAnswer":70},"What kinds of modules or consortium items could institutions add to the FSSE core instrument?",{"text":71,"@type":63},"Institutions could append topical modules and consortium items. Examples include modules on Academic Advising, Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity, Experiences with Writing, Teaching Professional Development, and others, along with consortium questions.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":74,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":76,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":78,"site_id":7},583487,1792811509,{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":82},"success",[83,87,91,95,100,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":84,"show_sort_weight":85,"slug":86},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":88,"show_sort_weight":89,"slug":90},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":92,"show_sort_weight":93,"slug":94},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":96,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":97,"show_sort_weight":98,"slug":99},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":101,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":96,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":81,"data":131},{"doc_id":78,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":33,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":123,"preview_page_count":4},962084931830,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_a8503ba1806abce46bf441b54a3ca4cd","FSSE 2017 Overview  \nThe Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) complements the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). FSSE (pronounced “fessie”) measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are empirically linked with high levels of learning and development. The survey also collects information about how faculty members spend their time on professorial activities, such as teaching and scholarship, and what kinds of learning experiences their institutions emphasize.  \nFSSE results can be used to identify areas of institutional strength, as well as aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The information can be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.  \nThis overview provides general information about the institutions and faculty members that participated in the 2017 FSSE administration, and highlights ways institutions can use their results. In the first section, we compare the characteristics ofFSSE-participating institutions to those of NSSE-participating institutions and the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting institutions. We also compare the characteristics ofFSSE respondents to those of faculty members at U.S. bachelor’s-granting institutions and provide general information about response rates. In the second section, we provide guidelines for using and interpreting FSSE 2017 results, and highlight resources for analyzing and presenting FSSE findings. Resources intended to help with the use ofFSSE data are also on the FSSE website, [fsse.indiana.edu](fsse.indiana.edu).  \nFSSE 2017 Institutions and Respondents  \nIn the 2017 administration ofFSSE, 24,418 faculty members responded from 154 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States (153) and Canada (1) . All participating FSSE institutions select their own faculty samples. Faculty members at participating institutions were sent email invitations asking them to respond to the online survey.  \nNearly all FSSE institutions (143) also administered NSSEto their students in 2017; the remainder administered NSSE in previous years. Having recent data from NSSE allows participating institutions to examine how faculty  \nmembers and students respond to similar questions.  \nFor the FSSE 2017 administration, institutions could choose to add Topical Modules and consortium items to the end of the core FSSE instrument. The module on Academic Advising was appended by 48 institutions, Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity by 30, Experiences with Writing by 19, Teaching Professional Development by 17, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning by 16, Development of Transferable Skills by 15, Civic Engagement by 15, Learning with Technology by 12; and 8 institutions appended consortium questions. Institutions could append up to two modules or a module and a set of consortium questions.  \nTables 1 through 3 on the following pages provide more information about the participating institutions and faculty members who responded to the survey in the U.S.  \nProfile of FSSE 2017 Institutions  \nFSSE 2017 institutions were similar in many ways to the profile of U.S. bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities, while differing in a few respects (Table 1) . Although slight differences exist between these profiles, the distribution ofFSSE 2017 institutions reflects a wide range of U.S. institutions, which helps ensure that FSSE results represent a broad cross-section of U.S. faculty members.  \nSimon Fraser University  \nTable 1  \nProfile of FSSE and NSSE 2017 U.S. Institutions and All U.S. Bachelor’s-Granting Institutions  \n\n| Institution Characteristics | FSSE\u003Cbr>2017\u003Cbr>(%) | NSSE\u003Cbr>2017\u003Cbr>(%) | U.S.a\u003Cbr>(%) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Carnegie Basic Classificationb Doc/Highest: Doctoral Universities (Highest Research Activity) | 3 | 5 | 7 |\n| Doc/Higher: Doctoral Universities (Higher Research Activity)","cbCainPHnvhFMSj4","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCainPHnvhFMSj4","pdf",545642,"English","# FSSE 2017 Overview\n## FSSE 2017 Institutions and Respondents\n## Profile of FSSE 2017 Institutions\n## Profile of FSSE 2017 Respondents\n## Guidelines for Using and Interpreting FSSE 2017 Results","[{\"question\":\"What does FSSE measure and how does it relate to NSSE?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices linked with learning and development. Many institutions administer NSSE as well, enabling comparison of how faculty and students respond to similar questions.\"},{\"question\":\"How many faculty participated in FSSE 2017 and where were they from?\",\"answer\":\"In the 2017 administration, 24,418 faculty members responded from 154 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States and Canada.\"},{\"question\":\"What kinds of modules or consortium items could institutions add to the FSSE core instrument?\",\"answer\":\"Institutions could append topical modules and consortium items. Examples include modules on Academic Advising, Inclusiveness and Engagement with Cultural Diversity, Experiences with Writing, Teaching Professional Development, and others, along with consortium questions.\"}]","FSSE 2017 Overview - General information | PDF",1792047412]