[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-583445-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-583445-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","fsse-2016-overview-general-information-and-guidelines-for-using-results","FSSE 2016 Overview - General information and guidelines for using results","","FSSE 2016 (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement) complements NSSE by measuring faculty members’ expectations for student engagement in educational practices linked to learning and development. The overview explains how institutions administer FSSE, collect data on faculty time and emphasized learning experiences, and use results to identify institutional strengths and undergraduate experience areas needing attention. It outlines comparisons between FSSE and NSSE institutions/respondents, reports administration details, and provides guidance and resources for interpreting FSSE 2016 findings.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fsse-2016-overview-general-information-and-guidelines-for-using-results/583445/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fsse-2016-overview-general-information-and-guidelines-for-using-results/583445.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jake","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-01","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",6,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What does FSSE 2016 measure and how is it related to NSSE?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"FSSE 2016 measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices tied to high learning and development. It complements NSSE, which is administered to students, by enabling institutions to examine responses to similar questions from faculty and students.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How many faculty members and institutions participated in the FSSE 2016 administration?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"In 2016, 14,512 faculty members responded from 119 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States and Canada.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How can institutions use FSSE 2016 results?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Institutions can identify areas of institutional strength and aspects of the undergraduate experience that may require attention. The results also support productive discussions about teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},583445,1793014852,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,105,110,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":102,"show_sort_weight":103,"slug":104},"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":106,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":107,"show_sort_weight":108,"slug":109},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":111,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},8,30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":111,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":123,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","FSSE 2016 Overview  \nThe Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) complements the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). FSSE (pronounced “fessie”) measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are empirically linked with high levels of learning and development. The survey also collects information about how faculty members spend their time on professorial activities, such as teaching and scholarship, and what kinds of learning experiences their institutions emphasize.  \nFSSE results can be used to identify areas of institutional strength, as well as aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The information can be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.  \nThis overview provides general information about the institutions and faculty members that participated in the 2016 FSSE administration, and highlights ways institutions can use their results. In the first section, we compare the characteristics ofFSSE-participating institutions to those of NSSE-participating institutions and the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting institutions. We also compare the characteristics ofFSSE respondents to those of faculty members at U.S. bachelor’s-granting institutions and provide general information about response rates. In the second section, we provide guidelines for using and interpreting FSSE 2016 results, and highlight resources for analyzing and presenting FSSE findings. Resources intended to help with the use ofFSSE data are also on the FSSE website.  \nFSSE 2016 Institutions and Respondents  \nIn the 2016 administration ofFSSE, 14,512 faculty members responded from 119 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States and Canada. All participating FSSE institutions select their own faculty samples. Faculty members at participating institutions were sent email invitations asking them to respond to the online survey.  \nNearly all FSSE institutions (105) also administered NSSEto their students in 2016; the remainder administered NSSE in previous years. Having recent data from NSSE allows participating institutions to examine how faculty  \nmembers and students respond to similar questions. For the FSSE 2016 administration, institutions could choose to add Topical Modules and consortium items to the end of the core FSSE instrument. This year, the module on Academic Advising was appended by 44 institutions, Learning with Technology by 22, Development of Transferable Skills by 13, Civic Engagement by 10, Experiences with Writing by 16, Experiences with Diverse Perspectives by 11, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning by 13, and Teaching Professional Development by 9; and 7 institutions appended consortium questions. Institutions could append as many as two modules or a module and a set of consortium questions.  \nTables 1 through 3 on the following pages provide more information about the participating institutions and faculty members who responded to the survey in the U.S.  \nProfile of FSSE 2016 Institutions  \nFSSE 2016 institutions were similar in many ways to the profile of U.S. bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities, while differing in a few respects (see Table 1) . Although slight differences exist between these profiles, the distribution ofFSSE 2016 institutions reflects a wide range of U.S. institutions, which helps ensure that FSSE results represent a broad cross section of U.S. faculty members.  \nUniversity of Missouri—Kansas City  \nTable 1  \nProfile of FSSE and NSSE 2016 U.S. Institutions and All U.S. Bachelor’s-Granting Institutions  \n\n| Institution Characteristics | FSSE\u003Cbr>2016\u003Cbr>(%) | NSSE\u003Cbr>2016\u003Cbr>(%) | U.S.a\u003Cbr>(%) |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Carnegie Basic Classificationb Doc/Highest: Doctoral Universities (Highest Research Activity) | 2 | 5 | 7 |\n| Doc/Higher: Doctoral Universities (Higher Research Activity) | 4 | 9 | 6 |\n| Doc/Moderate: D","cbCaivRQFgM9sD5i","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaivRQFgM9sD5i","pdf",376122,"English","# FSSE 2016 Overview\n## FSSE 2016 Institutions and Respondents\n## Profile of FSSE 2016 Institutions\n## Profile of FSSE 2016 Respondents\n## Guidelines for Using and Interpreting Results","[{\"question\":\"What does FSSE 2016 measure and how is it related to NSSE?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE 2016 measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices tied to high learning and development. It complements NSSE, which is administered to students, by enabling institutions to examine responses to similar questions from faculty and students.\"},{\"question\":\"How many faculty members and institutions participated in the FSSE 2016 administration?\",\"answer\":\"In 2016, 14,512 faculty members responded from 119 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States and Canada.\"},{\"question\":\"How can institutions use FSSE 2016 results?\",\"answer\":\"Institutions can identify areas of institutional strength and aspects of the undergraduate experience that may require attention. The results also support productive discussions about teaching, learning, and the quality of students’ educational experiences.\"}]","FSSE 2016 Overview - General information and guidelines for using results | PDF",1792047256]