[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"doc-seo-583446-105":3,"detail-sidebar-cat-0-en-105":81,"doc-detail-583446-en":130},{"code":4,"msg":5,"data":6},0,"ok",{"site_id":7,"language":8,"slug":9,"title":10,"keywords":11,"description":12,"schema_data":13,"social_meta":74,"head_meta":76,"extra_data":78,"updated_unix":80},105,"en","fsse-2015-overview-general-information-and-results-use","FSSE 2015 Overview - General Information and Results Use","","FSSE (Faculty Survey of Student Engagement) complements the NSSE by measuring faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices linked to high learning and development. The overview explains how FSSE collects data on faculty time across teaching and scholarship, and how institutions can use results to identify strengths and opportunities in the undergraduate experience. It also summarizes 2015 administration participation, including modules, response rates, and comparison profiles for FSSE institutions and respondents.",{"@graph":14,"@context":73},[15,34,56],{"@type":16,"itemListElement":17},"BreadcrumbList",[18,23,27,31],{"item":19,"name":20,"@type":21,"position":22},"https://docshare.wps.com","Home","ListItem",1,{"item":24,"name":25,"@type":21,"position":26},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/","Document",2,{"item":28,"name":29,"@type":21,"position":30},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/research-report/","Research & Report",3,{"item":32,"name":10,"@type":21,"position":33},"https://docshare.wps.com/document/fsse-2015-overview-general-information-and-results-use/583446/",4,{"url":32,"name":10,"@type":35,"image":36,"author":41,"headline":10,"publisher":44,"fileFormat":47,"inLanguage":8,"description":12,"dateModified":48,"datePublished":49,"encodingFormat":47,"isAccessibleForFree":50,"interactionStatistic":51},"DigitalDocument",{"url":37,"@type":38,"width":39,"height":40},"https://docshare.wps.com/thumbnails/fsse-2015-overview-general-information-and-results-use/583446.png","ImageObject",300,407,{"name":42,"@type":43},"Jake","Person",{"url":19,"name":45,"@type":46},"DocShare","Organization","application/pdf","2026-11-06","2026-10-15",true,{"@type":52,"interactionType":53,"userInteractionCount":55},"InteractionCounter",{"@type":54},"ViewAction",8,{"@type":57,"mainEntity":58},"FAQPage",[59,65,69],{"name":60,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":62},"What does FSSE measure and how is it related to NSSE?","Question",{"text":63,"@type":64},"FSSE measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices empirically linked with high learning and development. It complements NSSE, which captures student engagement, and many institutions administer both in the same year to compare related responses.","Answer",{"name":66,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":67},"How many faculty members and institutions participated in FSSE 2015?",{"text":68,"@type":64},"In 2015, 19,056 faculty members responded from 133 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States.",{"name":70,"@type":61,"acceptedAnswer":71},"How can institutions use FSSE 2015 results?",{"text":72,"@type":64},"Institutions can identify areas of institutional strength and aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The results support productive discussions about teaching, learning, and student educational experience quality, and the document provides guidance for using and interpreting outcomes.","https://schema.org",{"og:url":32,"og:type":75,"og:title":10,"og:site_name":45,"og:description":12},"article",{"robots":77,"canonical":32},"index,follow",{"doc_id":79,"site_id":7},583446,1792987196,{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":83},"success",[84,88,92,96,101,106,111,114,119,122,126],{"id":22,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":85,"show_sort_weight":86,"slug":87},"Story & Novel",90,"story-novel",{"id":26,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":89,"show_sort_weight":90,"slug":91},"Literature",80,"literature",{"id":33,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":93,"show_sort_weight":94,"slug":95},"Exam",70,"exam",{"id":97,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":98,"show_sort_weight":99,"slug":100},5,"Comic",60,"comic",{"id":102,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":103,"show_sort_weight":104,"slug":105},6,"Technology",50,"technology",{"id":107,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":108,"show_sort_weight":109,"slug":110},7,"Healthcare",40,"healthcare",{"id":55,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":29,"show_sort_weight":112,"slug":113},30,"research-report",{"id":115,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":116,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":118},9,"Religion & Spirituality",20,"religion-spirituality",{"id":117,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":120,"show_sort_weight":117,"slug":121},"World Cup","world-cup",{"id":123,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":124,"show_sort_weight":123,"slug":125},10,"Lifestyle","lifestyle",{"id":127,"doc_module":4,"doc_module_name":25,"category_name":128,"show_sort_weight":97,"slug":129},19,"General","general",{"code":4,"msg":82,"data":131},{"doc_id":79,"user_id":132,"nickname":42,"user_avatar":133,"doc_module":4,"category_id":55,"category_name":29,"doc_title":10,"doc_description":12,"doc_content":134,"file_id":135,"file_url":136,"file_type":137,"file_size":138,"view_count":55,"is_deleted":4,"is_public":22,"is_downloadable":22,"audit_status":22,"page_count":33,"language":139,"language_code":8,"site_id":7,"html_lang":8,"table_of_contents":140,"faqs":141,"seo_title":142,"seo_description":12,"update_tm":143,"read_time":123,"preview_page_count":4},962084928904,"https://ap-avatar.wpscdn.com/davatar_155a257f0dc6eb9ab79c44ca47cae57d","FSSE 2015 Overview  \nThe Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) complements the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). FSSE (pronounced “fessie”) measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices that are empirically linked with high levels of learning and development. The survey also collects information about how faculty members spend their time on professorial activities, such as teaching and scholarship, and the kinds of learning experiences their institutions emphasize.  \nFSSE results can be used to identify areas of institutional strength, as well as aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The information can be a catalyst for productive discussions related to teaching, learning, and the quality of students’educational experiences.  \nThis overview provides general information about the institutions and faculty members that participated in the 2015 administration ofFSSE, and highlights ways institutions can use their results. In the first section, we compare the characteristics ofFSSE-participating institutions to those of NSSE-participating institutions and those of the U.S. profile of bachelor’s-granting institutions. We also compare the characteristics ofFSSE respondents to those of faculty members at U.S. bachelor’s-granting institutions and provide general information about response rates. In the second section, we provide guidelines for using and interpreting FSSE 2015 results, and highlight resources for analyzing and presenting FSSE findings. Resources intended to help with the use ofFSSE data are also on the FSSE website.  \nFSSE 2015 Institutions and Respondents  \nIn the 2015 administration ofFSSE, 19,056 faculty members responded from 133 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States that selected their own faculty samples. Faculty members at participating institutions were sent email invitations asking them to respond to the online survey. Nearly all FSSE institutions (125) also administered NSSE to their students in 2015; eight FSSE institutions had used NSSE in a previous year. Having recent data from NSSE allows participating institutions to examine how faculty members and students respond to similar questions. Each campus receives electronic copies of its reports and data file, along with a  \nlist of participating institutions. The list is also publicly available through the FSSE website.  \nFor the FSSE 2015 administration, institutions were able to add Topical Modules and consortium items to the end of the core FSSE instrument. This year, the module on Academic Advising was appended by 43 institutions, Learning with Technology by 18, Development of Transferable Skills by 13, Civic Engagement by 7, Experiences with Writing by 28, Experiences with Diverse Perspectives by 15, and Scholarship of Teaching and Learning by 23; and 8 institutions appended consortium items. Institutions could append as many as two modules or a module and a set of consortium items.  \nTables 1 through 3 on the following pages provide more information about the participating institutions and faculty members who responded to the survey. While included here and in each institution’s FSSE Respondent Profile, certain demographics (e.g., gender, rank, and employment status) were withheld from each institution’s data file to ensure that responses remain anonymous.  \nSUNY College at Oneonta  \nProfile of FSSE 2015 Institutions  \nFSSE 2015 institutions are similar in many ways to the profile of U.S. bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities, while differing in a few respects (see Table 1) . Although slight differences exist between these profiles, the distribution ofFSSE 2015 institutions reflects a wide range of U.S. institutions, which helps ensure that FSSE results represent a broad cross section of U.S. faculty members.  \nTable 1  \nProfile of FSSE and NSSE 2015 U.S. Institutions and All U.S. Bachelor’s-Granting Institutionsa  \n\n| FSSE NSSE\u003C","cbCaitaDdY9LgeGM","https://ap.wps.com/l/cbCaitaDdY9LgeGM","pdf",1116685,"English","# FSSE 2015 Overview\n## FSSE 2015 Institutions and Respondents\n## Profile of FSSE 2015 Institutions\n## Profile of FSSE 2015 Respondents (Tables 2 and 3)","[{\"question\":\"What does FSSE measure and how is it related to NSSE?\",\"answer\":\"FSSE measures faculty members’ expectations of student engagement in educational practices empirically linked with high learning and development. It complements NSSE, which captures student engagement, and many institutions administer both in the same year to compare related responses.\"},{\"question\":\"How many faculty members and institutions participated in FSSE 2015?\",\"answer\":\"In 2015, 19,056 faculty members responded from 133 bachelor’s-granting colleges and universities in the United States.\"},{\"question\":\"How can institutions use FSSE 2015 results?\",\"answer\":\"Institutions can identify areas of institutional strength and aspects of the undergraduate experience that may warrant attention. The results support productive discussions about teaching, learning, and student educational experience quality, and the document provides guidance for using and interpreting outcomes.\"}]","FSSE 2015 Overview - General Information and Results Use | PDF",1792047258]